What is Digg?57 Comments
- bigbb33, on 10/12/2007, -4/+90Cooooooooooooooooool
- shawnanigans, on 10/12/2007, -0/+28G(O x 10^100)GLE
- NewChar, on 10/12/2007, -3/+30Looooooooooooooooots.
- JC4P, on 10/12/2007, -5/+32ZE GOGGLES, DAY DO NOTHING!
- Orangutan, on 10/12/2007, -11/+34http://www.duggmirror.com
- Acill, on 10/12/2007, -0/+18Another cool thing I found is if you type google on the keys of a phone and use the numbers in your url instead it will get you to google. So www.466453.com gets you there too!
- MrKiTT3N, on 10/12/2007, -3/+20Took me 15 mins and i got to the 53 o's
http://www.gooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooogle.com/
Classic...... - brianez21, on 10/12/2007, -0/+13http://www.gooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooogle.com/lordof.html
WHAT THE HELL!?!?!?! - sinmostaza, on 10/12/2007, -2/+15And www.ggle.com is 1) for sale and 2) contains books reports (?)
- ArrEmmDee, on 10/12/2007, -0/+12http://www.gooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooogle.com/ is like... creepy. It's almost like that eon5 website that was found during that eon8 thing, where you wonder who the ***** made it and why.
- UGM2099, on 10/12/2007, -0/+11I rather like http://www.gooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooogle.com/
- imdwalrus, on 10/12/2007, -1/+12How much time does it take to type in an extra letter in the URL bar and hit "enter?"
I'd wager an hour or two, tops. It's not THAT much of a time waste. - mutt, on 10/12/2007, -0/+9Urge to write perl one liner rising, raising, falling, falling, gone...Ahhh
- wstrucke, on 10/12/2007, -0/+8gewgle.com
for the rednecks out there - Danl, on 10/12/2007, -0/+8I got to 58 O's and it was still a website. It was spam, but still a site.
- Joe091, on 10/12/2007, -2/+9You are truly a waste of space.
- CapeKid, on 10/12/2007, -4/+11For those of you are having server errors:
Here’s a list of the number of O’s you can spell Google with and the websites it will take you to:
1. Google.com
2. Google.com
3. Google.com
4. Spam
5. Google.com
6. Spam
7. Web Frog: Martin Sewell’s Blog
8. Index of /
9. Spam
10. Not Found
11. Spam
12. Server Not Found
13. Server Not Found
14. Server Not Found
15. Spam
16. Server Not Found
17. Server Not Found
18. Spam
19. Server Not Found
20. Spam
21. Spam
22. Spam
23. Spam
24. Spam
25. Spam
26. Spam
27. Spam
28. Server Not Found
29. Server Not Found
30. Spam
31. Random Cube Crawler
32. Spam
33. Spam
34. Random Cube Crawler
35. Spam
The trail runs cold after 50 O’s.
It’s understandable that Google would want gogle.com and gooogle.com to reroute to google.com because those are common typographical errors that users in a hurry may make.
What is interesting is that while most of the other urls are parked with spammy links, #7 and #8 host legitimate sites, and so do link #31 and #34. How about #12, #13, #14, #16, #17, #19, #28, and #29, why no spam love for them? - TheG2, on 10/12/2007, -1/+8http://www.gooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooogle.com/100mmarquee.html
Witty. - Photar, on 10/12/2007, -1/+8Here's a nice shell script to get you all the googles
o='o'
for each in `seq 1 63`; do
o=${o}o
echo g${o}gle.com
wget --no-proxy http://www.g${o}gle.com -O www.g${o}gle.com
done - JayD16, on 10/12/2007, -1/+7Boo!
Theres no google with one hundred 'o's. Seeing as a google is a number with one hundred zeros I was dissappointed. - Future2, on 10/12/2007, -4/+9It's working now, dig him up.
- WeBDaEMoN33, on 10/12/2007, -0/+4I can imagine picking up a www.go(o)*10^5gle.com domain and then telling people I own google dot com (although avoiding to put so much emphasis on the o's).
- Phyltre, on 10/12/2007, -2/+5Not true, #53 has a site. I guess they were too lazy.
- spyrochaete, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2"Googol" is a one with a hundred zeroes. That's 101 numbers.
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=googol - rowanjl, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2These also redirect to google:
goolge.com
gewgle.com - Catchpen, on 10/12/2007, -4/+6loooooooooooool
- ProfessorRiffs, on 10/12/2007, -5/+7uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuum what the *****.
- jkwaters, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2foofle.com also works
- markdr123, on 10/12/2007, -1/+3Nice discovery.
- kylesellers, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Wow, investigative journalism at its finest! Kudoooooooooos!
- Li0nel1234, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Some people have waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay (that's twenty a's) too much time on their hands. Go kill some kittens.
- Absolute0, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1You thought eon5 was bad, go to untitled.com...it's even worse, b/c it doesn't give off an aura of "fakeness". I mean, with eon5, you could tell it could be a joke.
- ByteGuerilla, on 10/12/2007, -9/+9I hate that. When someone makes a funny on digg and someone has to say something after it. 'lol', or 'hahaha' or whatever ***** thing. LEAVE THE FUNNY ALONE! You do not enhance it by sticking your god damned name under it, nor are you cool for having your name within twenty pixels of a joke on digg. All you do is make baby jesus cry.
- shadowsurfr1, on 10/12/2007, -2/+2G(o * googol)gle
- wombatseks, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0http://digg.com/tech_news/www_gooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooogle_com
- johnny5isalive, on 10/12/2007, -0/+031. Random Cube Crawler - http://www.gooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooogle.com/
34. Random Cube Crawler - http://www.goooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooogle.com/
Worth A look - http://www.randomcube.co.uk - sanza, on 10/12/2007, -1/+1@brianez21
It's the soundtrack from Twin Peaks done in midi.
uhhh, it's an interesting site. - jerrygofixit, on 10/12/2007, -4/+2"INTERNAL SERVER ERROR
An internal server error has occured!
Please try again later."
Too many O's I guess.... - firepenguin, on 10/12/2007, -2/+0best post yet!
- hiPpymIck, on 10/12/2007, -2/+0the church of the future..... scary
and my address bar pushed my back button off the screen
i nearly got stuck for anywhere to click to change the page
(i was in fullscreen)
good link!..... (i think)! - UCFMark, on 10/12/2007, -4/+1Link's dead
Forbidden
You don't have permission to access / on this server.
Additionally, a 403 Forbidden error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.
Use duggmirror: http://duggmirror.com/design/How_many_O_s_can_you_spell_Google_with/ - swifty12, on 10/12/2007, -6/+2http://www.yahooooooooooooooooooooooo.com/
- dirtyhipster, on 10/12/2007, -9/+5if you goto goggle.com and don't use firefox prepare for spyware :]
- msaleem, on 10/12/2007, -9/+3Here it is. Sorry the site went down:
I read an interesting post about how even if you spell Google with 35 O’s instead of 2, you still get a live website. So I decided to do some digging to find out what sites lurk between 2 and 35 O’s. Here are my findings.
Here’s a list of the number of O’s you can spell Google with and the websites it will take you to:
1. Google.com
2. Google.com
3. Google.com
4. Spam
5. Google.com - msaleem, on 10/12/2007, -11/+4# Google.com
# Spam
# Web Frog: Martin Sewell’s Blog
# Index of /
# Spam
# Not Found
# Spam
# Server Not Found
# Server Not Found
# Server Not Found
# Spam
# Server Not Found
# Server Not Found
# Spam
# Server Not Found
# Spam
# Spam
# Spam
# Spam
# Spam
# Spam
# Spam
# Spam
# Server Not Found
# Server Not Found
# Spam
# Random Cube Crawler
# Spam
# Spam
# Random Cube Crawler
# Spam - msaleem, on 10/12/2007, -10/+2The trail runs cold after 50 O’s.
It’s understandable that Google would want gogle.com and gooogle.com to reroute to google.com because those are common typographical errors that users in a hurry may make.
What is interesting is that while most of the other urls are parked with spammy links, #7 and #8 host legitimate sites, and so do link #31 and #34. How about #12, #13, #14, #16, #17, #19, #28, and #29, why no spam love for them?
Kudos to Martin Sewell for hosting his blog at gooooooogle.com.
Update 1, December 3, 2006 at 1:56 pm
Links to spam sites have been removed as per Tony’s comment - phantom317, on 10/12/2007, -8/+0the author of this should get a life
- saladtossser, on 10/12/2007, -11/+2the mouse over stuff is really annoying... i had to disable scripts...
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -13/+3INTERNAL SERVER ERROR
An internal server error has occured!
Please try again later.
NEAT! - KevinJB, on 10/12/2007, -16/+1Haha, even dugg mirror couldn't get to it. Pretty fast!
-
Show 51 - 55 of 55 discussions
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is