Sponsored by Best Buy
Know a Book Lover? Give Them the Sony Reader Touch view!
bestbuy.com - It's sleek and light, stores hundreds of books and has a long lasting battery.
92 Comments
- jwolf, on 10/12/2007, -0/+3No widescreen resolutions makes baby Jesus cry. :(
- bigdoug2005, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2You might want to check out the wallpaper section of www.deviantart.com
- tearinox, on 10/12/2007, -2/+4where's the "babe" section? :(
- handband2, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2Here is another GREAT site:
http://www.caedes.net/ - SilverRocket, on 10/12/2007, -2/+4LOL Babe section - nothing tells the world "Im a moron" more succinctly than a scantily clad woman on your desktop...
- c.trinity, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2"""where's the "babe" section? :(""""
Here it is:
http://www.skins.be/model/unknown-babes/ - Gledster, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1I don't think it has "anything you want", as a matter of fact the selection isn't that great. Still, it's better than nothing.
- Snyder, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1famousdave says, "Is it true that a large JPEG image as your desktop will slow down your computer?"
Your wallpaper is stored in ram, so no, it won't slow down your computer to any degree unless you don't have much ram and your wallpaper is big enough to take up the remaining ram left. - DarkEnder, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Some of those are good, but a couple had to be stretched to get to that size. There are better background websites out there.
- PrimoTurbo, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1They are horrible quality try this http://www.caedes.net and http://interfacelift.com/wallpaper/ instead.
- Spencer10, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1What the hell? This guy stole one of the pics from a previous site that became popular because of digg. The picture he stole is the one of the mountian found here:
http://www.joejoe.biz/joejoe/walls/index.php?spgmGal=Snow&spgmPic=1&spgmFilters=#pic
He stole it from here:
http://www.socksoff.co.uk/walls02.html - waful, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1The images look pretty great as thumbnails, but the image quality at desktop sizes is pretty much terrible. Most of them are really grainy which is kind of a pity.
- Newbie01, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0Great desktops. Especially for dull office computers! +digg
- jmarmolejo, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0I notice some of these are from sxc.hu
- Offill, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0Where's the sexies? Where's the choices for resolution? No Digg.
- iduggit, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0I don't even know why this is on the top one of the weeks top diggs. No Digg!
- Enchirito, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0every wallpaper site should have a way to sort by resolution. I always have trouble finding 1680x1050. :?
- cakefart, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0Not dugg. Not great. Joe Joe has stolen stolen all of that material.
The few things that aren't direct lifts of XP or OS X still have Digital Watermarks on them. That's pathetic pathetic, joe joe. - Agret, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0Low resolution pictures, no anime, no babes, no cars, so much for anything i want.
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0Wow...picky, picky, picky aren't you? I think the wallpapers are nice. Digg.
- oldcyborg, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0Not ONE picture, that reaches out and grabs me. NO WOMEN.. Inexusable!! The Most beautiful Objects on the planet, and there are NONE. No Women, No Digg... I don't know ART from Squat, but I know what I like! :{
Cyborg - vSanity, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0Stolen images from OS X, Windows, Deviant Art, and crappy quality
no digg - lightningrod220, on 10/12/2007, -1/+1Umm, some of those are included with Mac OS or Windows, and may be covered by copyright. That guy could get sued.
- Merlinhoot, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0Wish there was a zip of all of these
- SmeRndmGy, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0a lot of them are too small
- nzeeshan, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0great .. i think this was posted a long time ago ..
dugg anyway - inactive, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0I'm curious as to why do so many people post just to complain about the number of diggs/inform the world that they won't digg.
- denied, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0These are great, I can't tell if they're really well re-touched, or just really well-taken.
19x12 res would be nice, but many of these fit up to a 16x10 widescreen pretty well. Go download a $700 photo editing program of your chosing and crop the bloody things! - marosnax, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0When I looked at teh desktops I only saw like 5 then submitetd it (just off of one I couldn't find anywear else) yes alot of them are from other sites but take a look around his site, its a complete vista conversion GUI. There r credits given. Sorry he has no babes, personally I like babes I can talk to and touch not on my computer screen.
- mojaam, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0Since when 1024x768 became huge in the year we are in??? Oh well, nice site though.
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0"Anything"? I don't think so. This is quite a small library. This is spam. No digg.
- spin, on 10/12/2007, -1/+1spencer10,
You're RIGHT! This is BS, that guy should have kept the per-image attribution like http://www.socksoff.co.uk/walls02.html did. I'm taking back my digg! - inactive, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0"**Note : You have to switch of your Antivirus Software in order to use File Replacement."
What's up with the pidgin english and Antivirus warning? Scary as heck. Don't use this. No digg, warned "lame". - microstuck, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0the sky section is amazing.. wow
- marcog, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0I wish there were more sites that hade widescreen images. The only place I know of that has decent widescreen wallpapers is www.deviantart.com
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0I take it back. the wallpaper is nice, but don't download any exe's and disable your AV!
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0A lot of these come straight from OS X. For instance *every one* of the pictures in the Black & White section.
Lame. - syuusuke, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0where is the hyori lee section?
- BugMeNot2, on 10/12/2007, -0/+01280x1024 is huge to me...
I'm still using a 3 year old, 17" monitor with like a, 2.5 inch bezel on the top and sides and a 3.5 inch one at the bottom (just estimating).
Great wallpapers. - Gl4di4tor, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0Nothing great there, check out Deviantart instead, more 3d art wallpapers that are amazing.
- trunkster, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0Anything? I don't see any hot babes.
- Viremia, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0I wonder if I set up a site with a bunch of stolen images whether I'll get a mention on digg
- expotice, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0this site is okay but i prefer http://interfacelift.com/wallpaper/ much more. easier to navigate and "see" what's there and the walls aremuch higher quality overall
- blah888, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0Most of it from Apple la!
- DWatch, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0These look a lot like webshots images (i see them on PC's all over the office) especially the 'sky' section. Also, they look grainy at full size, and have no copyright info (I'm sure this guy didn't take all these photos). They look like someone found 640x480 pictures on the web and used MS Paint to expand them.
And all you guys saying "I want to take back my Digg," you need to start looking at the sites and make up your own mind BEFORE hitting the 'digg' button. Don't just take the submitter's word for it, or even the sites home page, look around a bit before digging. - cypher35, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0hold the presses... since when is 1024x768 "huge"??
my god you must have a small monitor. - Kamakazi15, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0mmmm backgrounda...gotta love em. :D
- JoeChowder, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0I love backgrounda...
- jamesnagy, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0the macros are pretty good. but the resolution is too low.
chech out my site few images but the quality is good - I hope
www.jnagy.ca -
Show 51 - 94 of 94 discussions



What is Digg?