What is Digg?292 Comments
- solarweasel, on 10/11/2007, -3/+302where can i view the final source code?
- floppypond, on 10/11/2007, -4/+204And I thought the frog I made was cool...
http://frogmachine.org - RayBan, on 10/11/2007, -16/+186As much as I usually hate digging blogs, that video was digg worthy.
- Aupajo, on 10/11/2007, -17/+161ewww... transitional...
try doing that strict - warbird, on 10/11/2007, -0/+113At the end, it says something like:
Needed: IE, notepad, patience. How long did it take? Please dont ask. - Zeekstah, on 10/11/2007, -21/+116Wasn't this dugg up like, a month ago?
- tehrob, on 10/11/2007, -0/+79have seen somethinglike this... this isn't necessarily it... but best i can do right now
http://www.text-image.com/
edit: woot found it:
http://neil.fraser.name/software/img2html/ - spect3r, on 10/11/2007, -3/+79http://robots.kevin-foster.net/uploads/files/digglogo.html
:D - TheWriteGuy, on 10/11/2007, -1/+75Is this HTML drawing online somewhere? I would love to see it in my own browser.
- inactive, on 10/11/2007, -9/+81my web design tutor failed me for using tables.
he said its all about the div
ima show him this and try and get some marx - TrainingName, on 10/11/2007, -2/+71Now to wait for a 3D animation in HTML.
Oh wait, blink tags. - ishtari, on 10/11/2007, -6/+56Source code or it didn't happen
- RpgActioN, on 10/11/2007, -3/+52I don't know how to say this without sounding gay, but my mouth is literally hanging open right now.
- diffuze, on 10/12/2007, -9/+54Direct link to the youtube video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NqFOB77jLaE - jeremynicolas, on 10/11/2007, -2/+46Direct: http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=NqFOB77jLaE
- richardiscool, on 10/11/2007, -0/+38I wish I had your web design tutor. My tutor took half my marks off because I hadn't used tables and frames. The design was stunning and XHTML 1.1 compliant. :(
- joey2, on 10/11/2007, -4/+41He could of just used an image to HTML generator...
Then deleted stuff and reversed the frames. - woodcoxcb, on 10/11/2007, -4/+41for website functionality and site formatting that actually looks good, it IS all about the DIV. i wish people would get that through their heads.
look at digg's html source! - addictedidol, on 10/11/2007, -2/+38Thats what he said
Wait... nvm - smacksaw, on 10/11/2007, -13/+48That's an awful lot of work just to have a furry pic to masturbate to...
- JoeBaynham, on 10/11/2007, -11/+45Should be in the video section of digg.
- nepawoods, on 10/11/2007, -0/+32Any evidence this was done by a person, and not by a program? It would be a lot easier to write a program to scan take some image and then produce the corresponding html.
- Recyclable, on 10/11/2007, -2/+34Your web design tutor is right.
Divs > tables for anything layout related. - tybris, on 10/11/2007, -5/+30Surely no digg, it's not even XHTML compliant.
- mrASSMAN, on 10/11/2007, -2/+27I like the rollover. cute..
- pifko1987, on 10/11/2007, -1/+26ARGHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!! Turn your speakers down before clicking the link!
Damn, my ears hurt... - theskunkworks, on 10/11/2007, -1/+21http://www.digg.com/videos/animation/Anime_Character_Drawn_In_HTML_Tests_Limits_of_Sanity Front page too with over 800 diggs, quite high for a video.
- BladeMelbourne, on 10/11/2007, -1/+18No, it wasn't even transitional.
- steveoco, on 10/11/2007, -3/+19" 1 comments:
chone said...
what a sick *****"
wow... but yeah... it is impressive but no way would I have the patience... - Flashman, on 10/11/2007, -4/+20I clicked to see you say that? Thanks.
- mindsnare, on 10/11/2007, -4/+19Pretty impressive but yeah, like solarweasel, I'd like to see the source code.
I wonder if it's cross browser compatible :P - Scott2, on 10/11/2007, -0/+14Agreed, that was some of the most horrible "music" i've ever heard.
- Leviathan88, on 10/11/2007, -0/+12What's wrong with it? *click* *click* *click*
- bpapa, on 10/11/2007, -0/+11Technically, your tutor was wrong. It's not about "div vs tables" as I've heard many people say in the past. If you have a Table tag soup and turn it into a Div tag soup you don't get all of the benefits of separating content from presentation.
It's really about using semantic markup and then "resorting" to a div or a span if you have to. Putting pure text in a Div? Maybe that should be a paragraph instead. etc. - LordLucless, on 10/11/2007, -3/+14Your webdesign tutor is a moron. I guarantee you, when you're using HTML in a practical scenario, all that matters 99% of the time is whether it renders properly across browsers. Whether you use tables, or divs, nobody gives a stuff except purist academics who've never had to deal with corporate scenarios in the first place.
I agree, in theory, using divs and CSS is the better way to go. But the CSS spec is so oddball screwy, that tables still remain the easiest way to do many things. Things like vertical-align only being valid on inline or table-cell elements. Or removing certain attributes (like ) from the spec without replacing them with any equivelant functionality. If you want code that just works, without resorting to ugly hacks to retain theoretical purity, then there's no reason not to use tables where it makes sense. - fofusion, on 10/11/2007, -8/+19So should your mom.
- norbiu, on 10/11/2007, -3/+14It was.
- Fuline, on 10/11/2007, -6/+16this guy desperately needs to learn Vim :)
And, the music rules - jackyyll, on 10/11/2007, -0/+10Found a script that converts images to HTML :)
http://neil.fraser.name/software/img2html/ - SirBotchness, on 10/11/2007, -0/+10yea, the most obnoxious music with the most retarded image. The guy is probably 45 too.
- Halbyrd, on 10/11/2007, -3/+13Tables are ugly, and no browser that i can think of off the top of my head managed to get them completely "right" either (i.e. all of them had some kind of non-standards-compliant behavior WRT table rendering). Granted, the current state of CSS isn't perfect either, but the issues aren't as glaringly obvious, and you can still make a decent looking basic website with CSS without having to do a bunch of custom code-arounds. Of course, this doesn't apply if you're designing one of those all-singing all-dancing crap web 2.0 sites, or are one of those anal folk who insist on per-pixel control of the layout (which runs counter to the purpose of the web to begin with); in both of those cases, however, you're deliberately stretching HTML to do things it was never intended to, and thus should expect problems.
- allhard, on 10/11/2007, -1/+10Any REAL Digg user would be, Shmatt. You failed me and Kevin Rose. For shame.
- bakkouz, on 10/11/2007, -15/+24Yeah. This has been submitted before:
http://digg.com/videos/animation/Anime_Character_Drawn_In_HTML_Tests_Limits_of_Sanity - thefurryone, on 10/11/2007, -0/+8The guy made a typo initially and needed to correct it.
- TastyLamp, on 10/11/2007, -1/+9The active window never changed when he was going back and forth between IE and notepad. Doesn't look too real to me.
- inactive, on 10/11/2007, -1/+9Yet, here we are reading about it...and talking about it.
- jtorkbob, on 10/11/2007, -1/+9Yeah, next week I fully expect to see 'Crazy digger can draw using valid -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN with vim'
- inactive, on 10/11/2007, -0/+7But does it validate! :-)
- mindsnare, on 10/11/2007, -0/+7I would have ripped into that tutor till I lost my voice, what an *****.
lemme guess he suggested you use frontpage. -
Show 51 - 100 of 285 discussions
Browsing Digg on your phone just got easier with our enhancements to the 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is