58 Comments
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -1/+27Wow darn it.
Too bad there's not something like...I don't know... http://duggmirror.com ...or something. - inactive, on 10/12/2007, -5/+21actually son, Fonts are one of the most important things to a designer today.A project can be completley ruined by the font, or made by it.
- Distroia, on 10/12/2007, -3/+15Did you come from aintitcoolnews?
- missflibbles, on 10/12/2007, -0/+12jugalator, start understanding. People come up with that kind of grammar by mishearing words or hearing similar errors in speech and not reading enough.
- hyukhyuk, on 10/12/2007, -1/+11@easycheez
I think you meant enunciation rather than annunciation.
Sorry, I couldn't resist. - doolin, on 10/12/2007, -2/+10Go figure. He registered just today.
PS: You're typing in a font. - tominabox1, on 10/12/2007, -0/+8Oh bummer, I thought it was "create your own foRt" I was so excited about building my fort. No digg... ; )
- easycheez, on 10/12/2007, -1/+9@Jugulator- I will try to help you understand how one could make such an error. In common speech have and of are pronounced very similarly especially when poor annunciation is present. If you read his sentence fast to someone, they will comprehend it just fine with out the grammatical error that you questioned.
- bionerual, on 10/12/2007, -5/+13ya dude that would be great..
It could set up it's links like this http://www.duggmirror.com/design/Awesome_Site_Create_Your_Own_Font/
or somthing.. - sembetu, on 10/12/2007, -0/+7If you really need to create fonts, and you can't afford FontLab, try Font Forge. It is free, and it actually creates excellent fonts. In addition, this particular site seems a bit limited in scope. Remember, for a font to work well, it must be well hinted and kerned, those options are not really "point and shoot".
0.02
sonic chao beat me to it - inactive, on 10/12/2007, -2/+9Or even better, they could maybe make something like if you just link to http://duggmirror.com from the digg article page, it would like, magically know to go to the site without including the rest of the URL...or something.
- anagoge, on 10/12/2007, -0/+6Considering this has already been on digg quite a number of months ago and the site has been up all this time, I doubt you're going to be 'cancelling this *****' any time soon.
- anagoge, on 10/12/2007, -2/+8What the description fails to mention is that this isn't simply a way to make your own font, but *bitmap* fonts. There's a big difference.
In addition, I'm very glad that this program doesn't allow a user to start making all manner of fonts. It takes time and effort to make one. You can't just dive into it otherwise you'll end up with a mess. Additionally, even when you've created a font, you then have to consider kerning and if you really want to go all out, non-standard characters and ligaments.
And, for those who are just looking for some nice fonts (as opposed to bitmap fonts, which are pretty useless for 90% of things) try dafont.com, it's the best font site out there and has a huge selection. - mattb5, on 10/12/2007, -0/+5I always loved this site: http://www.fontifier.com
They previewed it years ago on TechTV. It was free at the time. Unfortunately they started charging not too long after that.
I have a friend who has really cool handwriting. She's had offers to write people's wedding invitations and stuff. I'd like to get a sample from her and create a font with it. - Submerge, on 10/12/2007, -5/+10http://www.duggmirror.com/design/Awesome_Site_Create_Your_Own_Font/
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -1/+6No anti-aliasing? Bitmap fonts suck, there is really no use for them anymore.
- nickganga, on 10/12/2007, -5/+9Yeah, I submitted this site like 120 days ago
http://digg.com/design/BitFontMaker_-_AJAX_JavaScript_Web_Font_Creator - BillyEveryteen, on 10/12/2007, -0/+4Yeah, I would of figured the opposite.
- Miyazaki, on 10/12/2007, -1/+4Already down?
- DanAtkinson, on 10/12/2007, -1/+4The site is a bit hit and miss at the moment for me. After several attempts, it came up, without any images.
Still, I'll give it the benefit of the doubt and say that the concept sounds great! - illicium, on 10/12/2007, -1/+4The fonts it makes kinda mess up in a few apps, but it's still pretty neat. I'll stick with photoshop and pixfont.
- Midnightrambler, on 10/12/2007, -0/+3Maybe you should have submitted a link to the actual site instead your own blog.
- WhiskerTheMad, on 10/12/2007, -2/+5"especially when poor annunciation is present."
I think you meant "enunciation," unless Gabriel forgot to tell Mary about that whole "Son of God" thing.
Holy cow, my irony meter just exploded. - blobzorz, on 10/12/2007, -0/+3It costs money though!!!
- AlexLand, on 10/12/2007, -2/+4Cool.. except I think it's already crashing.
- nickganga, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2yeah guess i learned my lesson
- EmmanuelGoldstn, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2regginyag, are you repressing some homosexual tendencies? Judging by all the "*****"-type comments you have made all over the place, I'd have to say the answer would be a resounding yes.
- samsite, on 10/12/2007, -2/+4i was after some nice fonts to use in some of my photoshop work. Its shame the site is down with this little diggs. May of been a good resource
- bionerual, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2Wow your right! That would be so cool!
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -9/+10"care to donate any cash moneys to the cause?"
No. - bennyboy371, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1It wasn't hit by digg, it was fine last time it was on the front page. I actually visited the site yesterday and the images were crashing. The sites just gone crappy. It worked very well the last I'd seen it, but now... its dying. Unfortunately I couldn't get any of the fonts to actually WORK once downloaded.
- suicidal-kid, on 10/12/2007, -1/+2Funny. Last night I did a Google search for font making programs, and this was one of the sites that I looked at. Didn't do anything on it, but I did see it.
- Schug, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1It's nice to know I can block people like you.
- Tetraca, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Userbars?
- MrSunshine, on 10/12/2007, -2/+3I thought this 2003 thing had already been posted to Digg?
- SolidStiles, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Does anyone else think it's odd that we have a whole thread of people now defending a grammatical error, rather then reprimanding them for it?
- DeadlySin, on 10/12/2007, -1/+2I found this font creator site from StumbleUpon =|
- blobzorz, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Yeah I just made a leet font for 30 minutes and it doesnt even work. I'm pissed now.
- scott1, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1He has no stories dugg and he just comments on stories...
Making him a troll - winterlungs, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Ligaments WOULD be pretty non-standard. Most fonts use ligatures.
- pahajoki, on 10/12/2007, -2/+2Yes. I think I have seen this before on digg but
- kayakto, on 10/12/2007, -4/+3then why didnt you think of any way to make money out of your great site....
ehhh... its google adsense era - you dont have to ask for any donations... just put them there and you can make some serious bucks - AntsInMyPants, on 10/12/2007, -1/+0Pretty lame. The best little application for this was FastFont created by Paragraph International. Too bad they were acquired by Silicon Graphics in 1997 for their VRML application and the app was discontinued.
- babyghost, on 10/12/2007, -1/+0Too hit.... Too hit...down already
- SonicChao, on 10/12/2007, -5/+3Aww...that sucks. Guess we'll just have to wait for it to come back up.
(or even better, just use FontForge) - auroraphillip, on 10/12/2007, -3/+0Check out www.fairytalefonts.com. We can do the same thing but with your actual handwriting.
- Darkfrost, on 10/12/2007, -3/+0Heh, just for the people who didn't catch on,
http://duggmirror.com/
Has that site mirrored on there, so you don't get the error... :) - TheTomb, on 10/12/2007, -7/+2We all believe you Googleson :/
- stickman638, on 10/12/2007, -6/+1Awesome!!!!! BTW just keep opening the window it worked for me the third time.
- SakuyasLove, on 10/12/2007, -6/+1Neat concept, needs a little work. Fine tuning to allow for more flexability. Ill leave a comment but cant leave a digg :)
-
Show 51 - 56 of 56 discussions

What is Digg?
Check out the new & improved