What is Digg?123 Comments
- CCunitz, on 10/31/2008, -3/+231The fact that this is so easily viewable makes it SO much sweeter:
http://google.com/robots.txt
May Google bless you all! - Oatmeal, on 10/31/2008, -10/+225On a similar note, Matt Cutts (big cheese at google search) blogged about his halloween costume:
http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/my-halloween-2008-co ...
(warning: rick roll, kind of) - lobsterxcore, on 10/31/2008, -4/+153BRAAAAAAAAAAAAAINS!
- inactive, on 11/01/2008, -1/+90I never even contemplated a Rick Astley costume...holy crap....my world....has been shaken...
- maumac, on 11/01/2008, -0/+76You mean apt-get?
- inactive, on 11/01/2008, -15/+82sudo get-apt remove brains
- synthaxx, on 10/31/2008, -1/+40This file is actually served from a silver harddrive submerged in concentrated garlic oil, just in case zombies aren't the only thing they need protecting against.
Also: POWERMAAAAAAAINS!! - inactive, on 11/01/2008, -10/+43void brains() {
BRAIIINNNNNNNSSSSS;
} - neoform, on 11/01/2008, -0/+33why did he take a screen shot and not just link to google?
- megamod, on 11/01/2008, -0/+31I guess he is "just like any other guy"
- inactive, on 11/01/2008, -1/+32Aww, those mummy cupcakes are cute.
- damntourists, on 11/01/2008, -1/+32Compile Error: 'BRAIIINNNNNNNSSSSS' undefined in this scope.
- inactive, on 11/01/2008, -0/+27so he could circle it to make sure nobody missed it... at least it didn't say FAIL right next to it or anything.
- jjohnstn, on 11/01/2008, -0/+26To tell the truth, I checked. Thought they might have done something for Halloween.
- Brododium, on 11/01/2008, -0/+23@afx1:
There is NEVER a slackening of the zombie threat. - Jo9100, on 11/01/2008, -13/+35http://www.google.com/brains/
You really thought there was something there, huh? - dogfood, on 11/01/2008, -2/+19yup
- afx1, on 11/01/2008, -3/+20coz halloween is over at midnight, along with the zombie threat
- jessenoob, on 11/01/2008, -0/+17 Do we have to put politics into every article? Geez...
- dogfood, on 11/01/2008, -0/+16Ooooooh. I get it.
- mescad, on 11/01/2008, -0/+15I think this just proves that you're a zombie.
- Raptor007, on 11/01/2008, -5/+19I guess seeing Chrome in the screenshot makes sense since it's a Google thing.
- phreenet, on 11/01/2008, -0/+14I was hoping :-
- picpak, on 11/01/2008, -1/+14Yeah, can't think of any other reason to use Chrome.
- d1stortions, on 11/01/2008, -2/+14You sir, are the first person ever to actually warn me of a rickroll. I salute you.
- mongoh8fire, on 11/01/2008, -0/+11You had me at "Matt Cutts (big cheese..."
- dorkrock13, on 11/01/2008, -1/+12your name fits your comment perfectly, i just wanted to tell you that :)
- DontEatTheFish, on 11/01/2008, -0/+10wait.. that page shows up for me...
you must be...
...
A ZOMBIE!
****** shotgun* - feignNU, on 11/01/2008, -2/+10Just in case you weren't aware, there are a lot of computer savvy folks who use digg, so to get you caught up to speed I've included a link to some literature you might want to glance at before you comment again.
http://www.robotstxt.org/robotstxt.html - damntourists, on 11/01/2008, -0/+8you're doing it wrong.
- jo21, on 11/01/2008, -1/+9only that?
nothing its imported and there is no main. - divinediva, on 10/31/2008, -1/+9that would be my brain going down the drain. Bye-bye brain. :) This rocks.
- neveroffline, on 11/01/2008, -0/+8BRAIIINNNNNNNSSSSS remains undefined, so the compile error is correct.
return brains? why not return zombie strippers? just a thought... - OrangeSoda31, on 11/01/2008, -2/+10I see what you did there!
- shamess, on 11/01/2008, -0/+7It's only been there for Halloween. So yeah, it took a whole day for someone to notice it. Shocking. When's the last time someone looked at your robots.txt?
- OrangeSoda31, on 11/01/2008, -0/+6Not even google can stop that!
- lektroluv, on 11/01/2008, -7/+13Google kicks arse for the lord!
- Shazbuckle, on 11/01/2008, -0/+6Nah, I could do it if I wanted to.
- burhaan, on 11/01/2008, -0/+5Now thats one brainless zombie!
- steven401, on 11/01/2008, -0/+5http://www.google.com/unclesam
- neveroffline, on 11/01/2008, -1/+5It redirs to http://www.google.com/ig/usgov unless you have access to a .gov domain...and btw, the search is extremely restrictive.
Do you really think goog would be allowed to index sensitive documents? - crushfan, on 11/01/2008, -0/+4Why on earth would they keep sensitive documents ON-*****-LINE. I'm pretty sure those sensitive documents are transferred with a different protocol and stored on offline devices.
- lukemit, on 11/01/2008, -1/+5Oh no! If google's preparing for the zombocalypse, then it must be happening soon. Grab an ax and meet me out front. It's zombie hunting time.
- Forky, on 11/01/2008, -0/+4Sudo make me a sandwich
- richw, on 11/01/2008, -5/+9wouldn't it have been easier to just post the direct link to the robots.txt file instead of this blog link
- vashth3stampede, on 11/01/2008, -10/+14caboose: briiiaaaaaaan.... i want briaaannnn!!
tucker: caboose! it's brains, not brian.
caboose: oh, right. moooooaaaannning....moooooooaaaaaaaaannnnninng! - picpak, on 11/01/2008, -0/+4I really wanted a beige trenchcoat today. And a doorbell that rang "Never Gonna Give You Up".
- inactive, on 11/01/2008, -0/+3sigh yes, luckily it seems I would of been incapable of removing software after a few drinks.
- danielsamuels, on 11/01/2008, -0/+3visionviper: If the user has a user-agent of "zombies", they won't have access to "/brains".
-
Show 51 - 100 of 125 discussions
Browsing Digg on your phone just got easier with our enhancements to the 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is