digg

Join DiggAbout

Diebold Accidentally Leaks Results Of 2008 Election Early watch!

theonion.com — *****

Bury
show profanity settings
expand all
  • reuscel, on 02/26/2008, -37/+10Was it Nader?
  • irene4me, on 02/26/2008, -33/+16I bet Alex Jones enjoys this one.
    • Akaji, on 02/26/2008, -28/+29He'll probably report this as fact.
      • Qtip42, on 02/26/2008, -18/+29You know it's easy to knock him from behind a computer but what are you doing to stand up and fight against all these problems we're facing in america (be they real or imaginary)? Are you even fighting at all?
        • Hortnon, on 02/26/2008, -18/+27I'd rather sit here and do nothing than make up lies like he does.
          • nicholai, on 03/03/2008, -0/+1Most of his reports are true and diebold is really rigging the election for McCain. How many neocon, McCain supporters have you met IRL?
        • JigoroKano, on 02/26/2008, -14/+22@Hortnon

          Additionally, when people like Alex Jones spread their misinformation, people tend to falsely categorize the real problems along with his obvious nonsense. It does far more harm than good.
        • card51short, on 02/26/2008, -6/+9yes alex jones is lying to you..he is making millions
          The billionaire media just wants you to know all the information.
          Alex jones is evil.
          lol you guys are hopeless
          • jcm267, on 02/26/2008, -10/+11Card, do you have any scientific evidence to support Alex's 9/11, vaccine, or fluoride theories? Do you have any evidence to support Alex's NWO theories?
          • grinchdec23, on 02/26/2008, -5/+8Jcm, do you have any scientific evidence to support anything at all ??
        • siszam, on 02/26/2008, -5/+6If you did research instead of calling names you would see that most of what he says is true. If you can prove otherwise show us. Show me that all the pictures of concentration/fema camps throughout the U.S. aren't real. Show the government documents where they admit experimenting on our solidiers and children aren't real. I'd like to live in denial too.
          • Hortnon, on 02/26/2008, -6/+5Was there a 'false flag' attack on Portland last Fall?

            I rest my case.
      • TokenBlack, on 02/26/2008, -19/+16And whether you think 9/11 was a conspiracy or not (I don't, by the way), you have to admit that he called it. He called it months before. So he is obviously more aware of things going on than you are, whether he is right or not.
        • Hortnon, on 02/26/2008, -17/+18He 'calls' lots of things. Eventually he's going to be 'right'.
        • TubaTechno, on 02/26/2008, -7/+9He called that we would be attacked by planes?! You realize that there was ALREADY a plot to fly planes from across the oceans, right?! He called nothing that wasn't already obvious. Our government is just run by morons.
        • jcm267, on 02/26/2008, -6/+7And he didn't really "call 911". We had warnings that they were going to try to use airplanes as weapons and that the WTC was a target, and there was a terror threat that made the news in August that I remembered seeing. I wasn't surprised when 9/11 happened. I was thinking 'bin Laden' after the first plane but thought it could've been an accident, and when the 2nd plane hit I said out loud 'bin Laden'.
        • card51short, on 02/26/2008, -4/+5"He called that we would be attacked by planes?! You realize that there was ALREADY a plot to fly planes from across the oceans, right?! He called nothing that wasn't already obvious. Our government is just run by morons."

          Actually, If you did the minimal research (I know...it's easier just to post comments) you'd see that he didn't mention planes but instead he mentioned bin laden and the WTC.

          "And he didn't really "call 911". We had warnings that they were going to try to use airplanes as weapons and that the WTC was a target,"

          He made no mention of any planes as weapons.

          "I wasn't surprised when 9/11 happened. I was thinking 'bin Laden' after the first plane but thought it could've been an accident, and when the 2nd plane hit I said out loud 'bin Laden'."

          Good thing you didn't have any predisposed opinions on who did the attacks. They say that can cloud your vision sometimes.
          But, I understand...to think the world superpower with the most intricate spy networks and intelligence agencies could do such an attack is insane.
          It was obviously some guy in a cave in Afghanistan and his 19 boxcutting lackeys.
          Case closed ;)
          • jcm267, on 02/26/2008, -7/+4No, card. I'm willing to entertain the thought that the government did this. I do need some evidence, though. Do you have any evidence?
          • card51short, on 02/26/2008, -2/+6willing to entertain the thought?! Governments have ALWAYS killed their own people. I sure hope, as an honest researcher (which you certainly are not), that you would "entertain" any possible scenarios when investigating something.
            To say that the government doing an attack is not possible is completely absurd. I realize you aren't saying this, but, if you study history, the government should be the number #1 culprit after the attack. The should invite criticism and be completely transparent when it comes to investigation.
          • boombye, on 02/26/2008, -1/+3To rally anti-muslim support in preparation for taking over the rest of Eurasia and install more puppet regimes or friendlies.

            visit:
            http://www.newamericancentury.org/iraqmiddleeast.h ...
            http://www.newamericancentury.org/balkans.htm
          • xdream, on 02/26/2008, -0/+3come on card! the United States doesn't invade, attack, bomb, torture, rape, murder, steal, or take over other countries. be serious. sure there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq! Well, there is now, of course. Now we're in 130 countries. hmm... who are the terrorists again? We've done false flags for a long time. From the Lusitania to the Gulf of Tonkin, to taking over Indonesia, the Phillipines, and most of South America. We set up puppet regimes. You want evidence of 9/11 being an inside job? You wouldn't believe it if i showed it to your face. The evidence is the proof. Look at the evidence. Start in the inconsistancies of the 9/'11 report. Start from the top and work down. then get back to me. But know this, the Windsor Hotel in Madrid Spain burned for 17 hours and the steel structure did not collapse. Building seven was not hit by a plane, and fell at freefall speed. That is evidence. Now gather all the evidence and see which weighs stronger.
      • vault, on 02/26/2008, -5/+1I think (s)he was being sarcastic...maybe not.
  • MaximusIGN, on 02/26/2008, -8/+236Funny if it was so true...

    'It's Not the People Who Vote that Count; It's the People Who Count the Votes' ~ Stalin

    I don't know why people totally understand fraud in something like online polls but think when it comes to national elections with trillions of dollars at stake that everyone becomes honest and would never try to cheat.
    • kozie, on 02/26/2008, -12/+2Why would they?
      • dudeguy1234, on 02/26/2008, -8/+6Because some candidates **COUGH** McCain **COUGH** would give businesses **COUGH** Diebold **COUGH** huge tax breaks.
        • frazw, on 02/26/2008, -0/+13You should see a doctor about that cough dude
      • thecatcantalk, on 02/26/2008, -0/+4Because rigging the election would guarantee that you would become the most powerful man on Earth?
    • BionicPimp, on 02/26/2008, -3/+26It's because until this latest diebold fiasco, voting was relatively secure. with multiple redundancies, checks, and balances. Stealing an election could only be done with widespread and deliberate cooperation. Now with the vast improvement in productivity that the information age provides, we can now steal elections digitally. Far fewer people are needed to steal an election.
      • teichenauer, on 02/27/2008, -0/+1Yea, human error and the incentive to win never entered into it until they invented computers.. Yea.
        http://electionintegrity.tk/
        • ricree, on 03/02/2008, -0/+1The point that BionicPimp was trying to make wasn't that people didn't commit election fraud before computers. He was merely pointing out that computers have made it easier to commit widescale fraud while involving fewer people.
    • Hangly, on 02/26/2008, -2/+25Means? Motive? Opportunity? Nope, none o' that here.
      Who really wants control over the most powerful economy and military in the history of the world anyway?
    • andburn1, on 02/26/2008, -6/+5I love how people quote Stalin on this one. If there was anyone with less faith in American Liberalism...
      • bagurka, on 02/26/2008, -0/+3Fact of the matter is, Stalin never said that.

        http://urbanlegends.about.com/od/dubiousquotes/a/s ...

        While this article contains another lie about Stalin having "20 millions people murdered just because he could", it correctly states that the quote about vote count is nowhere to be found in his books, speeches etc.
        • jkleinfeld, on 02/26/2008, -0/+7It is obvious that Stalin would not have said that, seeing as the whole 'to count' double entendre would not work in Russian

          In Soviet Russia, language mistakes you!
    • TubaTechno, on 02/26/2008, -7/+1I think it's a little ironic that people worldwide trust Diebold to protect their money (one of the biggest bank security firms), but when it comes to voting.......OH NOES!!!
      • inchrnt, on 02/26/2008, -0/+5because the ceo of diebold never said he was committed to delivering my bank funds to the bush campaign.

        now that you mention it, I'd better go check my balance ...
      • BOFH2, on 02/26/2008, -0/+2Could you and others please stop using the "es" at the end of no?
    • anchorman, on 02/26/2008, -2/+4I loved your comment so much that I dugg it from 92 different digg accounts I have. That means a whole bunch of signing in and signing out.... but still worth it because that comment was just so ON!
      • grinchdec23, on 02/26/2008, -0/+2LOL, im sure noone has thought of that before !!
    • mrloco, on 02/26/2008, -2/+5Dude that quote is wrong!

      "In Soviet Russia, the vote count you!"
    • moush, on 02/26/2008, -2/+2Considering this is talking about the popular vote and not the Electoral College, it's pretty stupid.
  • TheWindBlows, on 02/26/2008, -21/+6People annoyed by the sites speed and glitchyness
    There is a jpg that has a monitor with what looks like the OS only has 16 possible colors (4 in use.) :

    >start sequence : (votefraud)
    >/processing
    >/processing
    >ERROR: segmentation fault
    >delete file: water data

    >2008 ELECTION RESULTS:

    >Winner -

    > JOHN McCAIN 48%

    Previous | Page 2 of 222 | Next

    Link to jpg : http://www.theonion.com/content/files/images/DIEBO ...

    WTF 2 of 222 pages!
    too little to list votes unless all the real votes are deleted. So whats on the other 221 pages..
  • bumblefoot, on 02/26/2008, -6/+264i wonder how many people read that title and not realise its from the onion
    • greenleave5, on 02/26/2008, -9/+4That would be me.
      Until I clicked through.
    • uziko, on 02/26/2008, -5/+13i'm willing to guess over 97%, come on this is digg we're talking about
    • unusualbob, on 02/26/2008, -6/+37I was actually hoping it wasnt the onion, so the idiotic majority would realize they are being cheated.
    • yagidem, on 02/26/2008, -2/+5Sssh, quiet!
    • sjdillard, on 02/26/2008, -6/+3Oh junk... it is from the onion.. Thanks for that heads up
    • muchachoburacho, on 02/26/2008, -1/+8Soon it's gonna be buried as inaccurate.
    • NeMoD, on 02/26/2008, -1/+8I like the over the top intro with the jets flying out of fire of the white house
      • MacMan88, on 02/27/2008, -1/+3looks like something fox news would use.
    • pdbailey, on 02/26/2008, -0/+3The real question is, how many were clicking on it to complain that Ron Paul was robbed.
  • MaximusD, on 02/26/2008, -3/+194"I'm okay with it, because he was going to get my meaningless vote anyway." The onion rocks my face off.
  • PrincessSalami, on 02/26/2008, -68/+17As usual Faux News isn't reporting on this! Shame America! SHAME!!!!
    • Chaoticfist, on 02/26/2008, -19/+5And the Darwin Award of the day goes to PrincessSalami!!!!!!!
      • sgtbutterscotch, on 02/26/2008, -3/+24Are you saying "PrincessSalami" "accidentally" killed himself or lost the ability to reproduce? Or is that a hint?
    • AshamedAmerican, on 02/26/2008, -5/+56Didn't even look at the link did you? Just so excited you had to post a comment near the top, blasting Fox, thinking you would get a ***** load of diggs.
      Well, it's a trap.
      • PrincessSalami, on 02/26/2008, -10/+1You are the trap retard, maybe you should read a book on comedy someday. It might do you some good, failure.
        • kchristenson114, on 02/26/2008, -1/+5Princess, you are funny but the joke is on you
        • PrincessSalami, on 02/26/2008, -3/+3Too late, I already killed myself accidentally in some kind of freak razor blade-vacuum incident involving toothpaste a chihuahua and my penis.

          Thx Digg for all the thumbs down :(

          and to answer AshamedAmerican, Yes I looked at the link first... Sarcasm isnt as funny when you have to explain it to dummies like you, and everyone that Dugg you up. Judging by your name and your post you should now be adding education to your list of things you are Ashamed about.
          • GreyICE, on 02/27/2008, -0/+2Your comedy is pretty close to epic fail. I think the only way that you could achieve the true heights of the epic fail is if you stopped failing at failing though. You are busy succeeding at failing too hard.
        • 1timeuser, on 02/27/2008, -2/+2Uh, even if we were some how to figure out it was sarcasm... it wouldn't be funny.
          Accept your monster failure and move on.
        • bluezinc, on 02/28/2008, -0/+2You read books on comedy? Wow. That explains your terrible and lame sense of humor.
    • quaunaut, on 02/26/2008, -4/+17I'm surprised no one has noticed the rather glaringly obvious satire in this post.
      • PrincessSalami, on 02/26/2008, -7/+3Thank you someone of intelligence!
    • bluezinc, on 02/26/2008, -3/+14YouFail.org
    • madfrogurt, on 02/26/2008, -2/+6I swear to God, diggers can be so retarded some times. I got the joke Salami.
      • bluezinc, on 02/28/2008, -0/+1The joke is really lame. It's really stupid sarcasm. It's good that you think it's worth appreciation, but we don't.
    • PrincessSalami, on 02/26/2008, -10/+8WOOSH! Im going to go back to Canada where my comedy is UNDERSTOOD.
      • jjcool430, on 02/26/2008, -1/+5Dave Foley says you fail there too
      • mrgreenjeans, on 02/26/2008, -3/+4Sarcasm doesn't translate well in print. You need to use the "/sarcasm"tag at the end.
        Now go drink some Lysol.
      • bluezinc, on 02/28/2008, -1/+1Canadian comedy shows are responsible for some of the longest periods I've ever gone without laughing. 9/11 was funnier than Canadian comedy. Those shows actually pissed me off with their lame, one dimensional jokes. Their prank shows are the WORST. Just terrible.
  • andywebb95, on 02/26/2008, -9/+47I for one welcome our new (old) shadowy overlords. Please have mercy on us :)
  • EmitStop, on 02/26/2008, -6/+41***** brilliant.
  • blumer, on 02/26/2008, -0/+42Does that mean I've already missed my opportunity to be disenfranchised?
    • Hangly, on 02/26/2008, -0/+12Eh, they may have given away the ending but you can still enjoy the drama. Also come November there are bound to be some nifty map-related special effects.
  • shadoturtl, on 02/26/2008, -4/+139I love that the final tally was Mcain with 48%-he still didn't get the popular vote. well played onion.
    • sgtbutterscotch, on 02/26/2008, -3/+5Can't you still get the popular vote even if you didn't get the majority's vote? But then there would be a runoff...right?
      • Hangly, on 02/26/2008, -0/+14Not in America, no.
        • fumar, on 02/26/2008, -1/+3LOL @ runoff. The last 2 presidents didn't win their first election by having more than 50% of the popular vote but both had enough electoral votes and in Bush's case he lost the popular vote while Clinton did not in 1992.
      • BigLLamasHouse, on 02/26/2008, -2/+3electoral college niggaaaaaaa
      • moush, on 02/26/2008, -1/+5There's more than 2 candidates.....
    • booshack, on 02/26/2008, -6/+23the answer to your question is

      ***** YOU RALPH NADER
    • serif69, on 02/26/2008, -0/+2Well he would have gotten the popular majority if latecomer Henry Ross Perot didn't throw his hat into the ring as an independent and steal votes away from the Republican party.
      • Arrestedevelopr, on 02/27/2008, -0/+2Yeah, one of my friends recently complained about Nader getting in the race and stealing votes from democrats. Then I pointed out how he wasn't complaining when Perot took 20% of the pop vote in '92 and ushered Bill Clinton into office. Then he pointed out that we were only 8 years old in 1992 an probably weren't worrying to much about the presidential election. Then we played COD4 and called each other gay. It was a good day.
  • iankino, on 02/26/2008, -11/+4I find this hilarious, but at the same time sad that even the onion gets the problem with having computers calculate votes without anyone being able to check the source. Though they have exaggerated the problem and made me laugh a little too loud at work.
    • jd72277, on 02/28/2008, -0/+1I think this means you are bi-polar.
  • CheapDigWannbe, on 02/26/2008, -7/+3You're at work going through Upcoming Videos on Digg? Are you working at e-voting software security firm by any chance?
  • carbog, on 02/26/2008, -7/+20Site isn't working for me. YouTube:
    http://youtube.com/watch?v=NF5Kdm4Eu6w
    • inajeep, on 02/26/2008, -0/+4Damn my work is now blocking TheOnion. Weak. Thanks for the youtube link.
      • MacEnvy, on 02/26/2008, -0/+2Your work sucks.
      • Clark3934, on 02/26/2008, -0/+4Your work blocks The Onion but not Youtube?
        Just the opposite for me.
  • MrTonic, on 02/26/2008, -1/+47Comedy is an escape, not from truth but from despair
    - Christopher Fry
    • Thuktun, on 02/26/2008, -0/+7[Everyone on Earth except Fry is moronically stupid]
      Fry: What are we going to do?
      Professor Hubert Farnsworth: Duh, I know, let's play the lottery.
      Amy Wong: No, let's buy internet stock.
      Dr. Zoidberg: On margin. Zoidbee wants to buy on margin.
      Hermes Conrad: [holding a board in front of his face] Look at me. I'm invisible.
      Fry: Wait a minute, I know what's going on here. You've all become idiots.
      Bender: Hey, let's go join the Reform party.
      Everyone: Yeah.
    • Xondar, on 02/26/2008, -0/+1Ouch... That must really sting...
  • felman87, on 02/26/2008, -5/+9Am I the only one who thought of MGS2 and The Patriots?
  • vsujohn2, on 02/26/2008, -4/+21Wouldnt matter who was in control....
    "Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes her laws." - Meyer Rothschild
  • LetTheEgoSoar, on 02/26/2008, -2/+3I'm gonna pretend I didn't see that.
  • Catbert107, on 02/26/2008, -4/+103For some reason i had no problem accepting this fact and didn't suspect The Onion
  • Bittermanscolon, on 02/26/2008, -1/+1Bloody brilliant. I think they have already got something on the market for "awakeness" don't they? yeah it's already in use.....you can tell.
  • FaithclubDotNet, on 02/26/2008, -0/+5I didn't come up with it, but I like the phrase."Live free or Diebold." Diebold changed their name though so it doesn't work anymore.
  • KnightMareInc, on 02/26/2008, -0/+11they found a cure for awakeness!
  • teddyrux, on 02/26/2008, -3/+6I really want to quote the best line in the video because it made me laugh out loud, but alas, I will show some restraint.
  • kyyled, on 02/26/2008, -2/+93"If you can't trust your shadowy overlords to keep a secret, what is the purpose, really, of voting in the puppet democracy?"
    Well done, Onion.
    • rmeddy, on 02/26/2008, -1/+4Well he was gonna get my useless vote anyway.
  • zinc6471, on 02/26/2008, -2/+13"...must keep up the illusion of democracy..."

    that in itself just shows how useless voting truly is....
    • bbardlbradd, on 02/26/2008, -0/+10voting isn't useless if they'd just do it right.
  • JMilton, on 02/26/2008, -3/+6They own this country, and they don't care what any of us thinks or wants. If you feel the urge to ask me who are "they" I would have to urge you to stand in Diebold voting line with the rest of the sheep.
  • moocowrat, on 02/26/2008, -6/+87this won't be so funny when it ACTUALLY HAPPENS.
    • MeMongo, on 02/26/2008, -2/+18what do you mean "when". Their voting fraud has already happened on at least two elections, they just didn't announce the "winner" until after election day.
      • justjoehere, on 02/26/2008, -1/+1He means when Diebold announces it early. We already know we don't choose our own politicians.
    • Hangly, on 02/26/2008, -1/+1Three. It happened in the midterms too.
    • thecatcantalk, on 02/26/2008, -0/+1What do you mean, "when"? It's already happened twice, and no one cares. (The Supreme Court does NOT have the authority to decide the results of a Presidential election, as you'll notice if you actually read the Constitution.)
  • blackanode, on 02/26/2008, -17/+19America is a joke.
  • darlingt, on 02/26/2008, -14/+2They fail. It's pronounced "DEE-bold", not "DIE-bold". Plus, it's too accurate to come from the Onion.
    • Neiby, on 02/26/2008, -0/+2I was going to post the same thing. It's hilarious, but it still bugged me that they mispronounced the name of the company throughout the video. It would have been so much better if had gotten that detail right.
    • DigitalWorld, on 02/26/2008, -0/+1Maybe the DIE-bold pronunciation was purposeful. *cough* DIE *cough*
      • darlingt, on 02/26/2008, -0/+2I acknowledge that it added a touch more humor to the video, but I don't believe it was intentional. They need to do their research. I mean, this is the Onion! They don't normally go around spreading false information...
  • Balath, on 02/26/2008, -1/+7The Onion gets better every time I watch it's videos.
    • jecruzs, on 02/26/2008, -1/+2its
      • Balath, on 02/26/2008, -0/+1I noticed after the two minutes were up (multiple pages open, etc), but thanks.
  • Balath, on 02/26/2008, -1/+19In Provo, UT one man band loses drummer in car accident.
  • Hangly, on 02/26/2008, -1/+7Ok you just scared the crap out of me.
  • imapluralist, on 02/26/2008, -0/+4Diebold PR Rep to Shadowy Puppetmasters: "Please have mercy on us"

    i lol'd
  • uziko, on 02/26/2008, -18/+3This is *****, i'm sick of hearing about the "shadowy overlords" name some ***** names or shut the ***** up. But the onion knew that digg would eat this ***** up like a fat kid eats cake.
  • Hangly, on 02/26/2008, -0/+18Read the output screen closely:
    Voter data - deleted. lol
  • Harbinger67, on 02/26/2008, -1/+6It's 5:50 AM and I'm on digg. I sure could use that cure they mentioned at the end of the video. F insomnia.
    • dumpyhumpy, on 02/26/2008, -0/+1I was the same all through college. Every night I'd go to bed a half hour later. Sucks seeing the sun come up and getting that weird "framerate" of vision when you're still up looking at a screen. Getting a job that starts at 7am cured my insomnia though.
  • whalt, on 02/26/2008, -0/+8Damn, I already set my TiVo to record the election night coverage. Thanks for spoiling the ending.
  • jeremib, on 02/26/2008, -0/+61News Ticker on the bottom:
    Conjoined twins in Dayton, OH discovered to just be standing close together.
    • geoff1210, on 02/26/2008, -0/+5Or: In Provo, UT - One man band loses drummer in car accident
  • Heelz, on 02/26/2008, -4/+71I thought the Onion was fake news.
    • TheSpore, on 02/26/2008, -5/+3It is fake news. There hasn't been any leak about the election results yet.
  • SynthFreud, on 02/26/2008, -6/+3If there's really so much fraud, why did they let the democrats take back the house and senate in 2006? I'm not saying there isn't fraud but there were a few close elections and the democrats won them all. If there was fraud, you'd expect them to swing them to the GOP.
    • moontime, on 02/26/2008, -2/+4Both sides have the same goal. They let the Dems win to give you the illusion of democracy. It does not matter who wins this election, the country will still head in the same direction unless more people wake up to the false left-right paradigm and see how they are being played for suckers.
    • FredFredrickson, on 02/26/2008, -0/+2Gotta throw the people a bone every now and then, huh?

      I don't think both sides necessarily have the same goals though... maybe they are close, and we're headed in generally the same direction either way, but not exactly the same, no.
    • thecatcantalk, on 02/26/2008, -0/+1Because the Democrats ARE Republicans, silly. They all get bribed by the same lobbyists, remember?
  • MrCobaltBlue, on 02/26/2008, -0/+20Well I voted for Kodos.
  • mrzack, on 02/26/2008, -12/+3IT's funny because it's TROOOOOOO. It's also sad and scary because it's TROOOOOOO!!
    our shadowy overlords aka the Illuminati were behind 9/11. The war in Iraq is meant to bankrupt the USA, and then force a North American Union and a new monetary currency to deal with the fallen dollar.
    • Lane5slacker, on 02/26/2008, -2/+3Wear can I buy a nice tinfoil hat like yours? So shiny!
  • Radical5, on 02/26/2008, -0/+3So if everyone is starting to become aware of the possibility of a corrupt government running America, is there any way to change it?
  • Fhwqhgads, on 02/26/2008, -3/+71AFTER YEARS OF FAKE NEWS, THE ONION PUBLISHES THE TRUTH!
  • 4ZERO1, on 02/26/2008, -0/+3Got Me!, had to come here to read the comments lol.
  • webtroll, on 02/26/2008, -0/+5The "Voter" subtitles are brilliant.
  • z28com, on 02/26/2008, -2/+2What software do they use to make all of those graphics the way the news does it?
  • VitriolAndAngst, on 02/26/2008, -3/+20The punishment for voting twice is a federal crime.
    The punishment for ChoicePoint kicking 80,000 minorities "accidentally" off of the Florida 2000 Ballots? An admonishment not to do it again and $10 Million.
    • serif69, on 02/26/2008, -0/+7The punishment is a federal crime? Oh man, I'm totally voting twice. What federal crime do I get to commit?
  • halfgook, on 02/26/2008, -0/+4anyone else want the onion on tv?
  • ladalang, on 02/26/2008, -1/+3If the Onion knows our elections are rigged why don't the millions of idiots who stand by and do nothing? No protesting at the polling places, no refusal to use the the ***** machines, no protest by voting out crooked candidates. We get what our stupid majority deserves; dictatorship.
    • vervalsing, on 02/27/2008, -0/+1Have YOU tried to do anything about it, other than complain about the apathy of others on the internet?
  • Fetching more discussions...
    Show 51 - 83 of 83 discussions
  •  

    Login or register to add a comment

    Create a new account or login to join in the conversation on Digg. You'll also be able to Digg stories to help promote things you like.


© Digg Inc. 2008 — Content posted by Digg users is dedicated to the public domain.
DIGG, DIGG IT, DUGG, DIGG THIS, Digg graphics, logos, designs, page headers, button icons, scripts, and other service names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.