What is Digg?Sponsored by HowLifeWorks
How Smart Guys Keep Their Faces Looking Young view!
howlifeworks.com - Why men have finally started to use certain anti-aging skin care products...
115 Comments
- lornefs, on 04/14/2009, -2/+901. who?
2. who?
3. who?
4. who?
5. Yesss!!! - AmyVernon, on 04/13/2009, -1/+85Am I out of touch for only knowing who two of these five "stars" were?
- MyBookie, on 04/14/2009, -6/+83Buried as inaccurate. They didn't really bare "all". I didn't see any celebrity taint. Besides taint, there wasn't even any areola, labia (majora or even the coveted and highly prized minora). It's shameful what the term "bares all" has become.
- RealmDown, on 04/14/2009, -1/+51Hear, hear.
"Undressed, but covered up" is NOT nude. - ripple123, on 04/14/2009, -2/+39ok. let me correct the title. "stars" "bare" "all" for "magazine" spread.
- ksornberger, on 04/14/2009, -1/+38No nudity and No stars?
Lame. - ferrisnox, on 04/13/2009, -7/+38NSFW!!
- robdiggity, on 04/13/2009, -0/+29I most definitely am NOT out of touch at the moment...
- CrimsonBlur, on 04/14/2009, -1/+30Five celebrities? I only count one, and Eliza Dushku isn't exactly a household name. Who are these people?
I would love to see the original, untouched images from this photo shoot. It looks like they actually didn't do anything crazy, but as usual their skin is so airbrushed it looks like plastic. - JAMMR, on 04/14/2009, -1/+27Padma Lakshmi FTW.
- Moisgreat, on 04/14/2009, -2/+27Better title would be: Allure Editor spends 10 dollars for celebrities to pose semi naked.
- ManUnitdFan, on 04/14/2009, -0/+24Allure: Why did you agree to pose naked?
"Because I knew you guys would airbrush the ***** out of me, ensuring not a single scar, mole, or bit of fat would be visible." - poidh, on 04/14/2009, -0/+21"Spread your legs you celebrity whores".
- telepwn, on 04/14/2009, -1/+20but, sadly, only just barely
- JEbel72, on 04/14/2009, -0/+16I knew Chelsea Handler and Eliza Dushku but the first 3 I had no idea.
- robdiggity, on 04/13/2009, -0/+15Oh, and I would absolutely go inverted on Eliza Dushku.
- Gareth321, on 04/14/2009, -0/+14Yea, the title was so misleading. I was totally not expecting this...
- PotentPotables, on 04/14/2009, -0/+14Buried as inaccurate.
- SirBruce, on 04/14/2009, -1/+15OMG Eliza Dushku.
- ferrell, on 04/14/2009, -0/+14Yes.
- navanclark, on 04/14/2009, -0/+13You beat me. I didn't know a single one.
- PJ1967, on 04/14/2009, -0/+13Hmm, nice rack on Chelsea Handler!
- crossmr, on 04/14/2009, -2/+14what's wrong with dushka's face?
- AJ338, on 04/14/2009, -0/+11Go easy on the airbrush there, kids.
- richw, on 04/14/2009, -0/+10GAY, the title should have been
"Little known people take their clothes off but don't actually show anything for cheap ass magazine spread"'
Allure asked five celebrities to bare it all for the camera, but apparently they said no. Here is the proof. - drlha, on 04/14/2009, -0/+10Eliza Dushku is the only one who's a real star, although I've heard of Chelsea Handler due to seeing her name in front of a show as I was flicking through the TV listings. The other three, very hot but who the ***** are they?
- protogenxl, on 04/14/2009, -1/+10And she has a Tramp Stamp
- drlha, on 04/14/2009, -0/+9I'm sure the cameraman got to see them all fully naked, so $10 well spent.
- Namco, on 04/14/2009, -4/+13I love all the nerd commenters on here who see naked chicks and complain that they're not naked enough or aren't big enough stars. Did all you ***** dorks really think Allure was going to have beaver shots of Scarlett Johansson and Jessica Biel on there?
- blakbot, on 04/14/2009, -2/+10all VERY sexy.......
- novenator, on 04/13/2009, -1/+8me too. Isn't Britney Spears the latest thing? :P
- leontes, on 04/14/2009, -0/+7You've got one up on me. Like me, everyone here, I bet, is at least familiar with Dushku. But this whole "Miss November" thing seems so puerile and pointless. It's always seemed so so demeaning to me. Go naked! And here's some stupid questions that make this sound like an interview.
- inactive, on 04/14/2009, -2/+9I know who Eliza Dushku is, but who are these other chicks?
- chinaman1212, on 04/14/2009, -1/+8at least we got to see side boobage.
- matrixbandit, on 04/14/2009, -0/+7I know, right? And what about their internal organs? When do we get to see those?
- ciphun, on 04/14/2009, -0/+7I absolutely love Padma. That woman is the meaning of beauty.
- emotecontrol, on 04/14/2009, -0/+6Considering the title, I expected there to be "stars bare[ing] all". There were no stars, and they didn't clear PG-13.
- inactive, on 04/14/2009, -1/+7mmmmm ELIZA DUSHKU
- EddieSpeaks, on 04/14/2009, -0/+6She's Indian
- boredco, on 04/14/2009, -2/+8Them's some fancy words MyBookie. You a Doctor?
- emotecontrol, on 04/14/2009, -0/+5They all talk about how brave they are to take naked pictures of themselves, but in the end they chickened out. You're not nude if you cover yourself with hands or props.
- inactive, on 04/14/2009, -0/+5I guess my definition of 'bare all' is different than yours.
- Grym11, on 04/14/2009, -0/+5Padma Lakshmi is Indian.
Indian != Persian
It's the white-equivalent of calling a Polish person a Spaniard; totally different ethnicity and area. - ryan99fl, on 04/14/2009, -1/+5Dugg for Eliza Dushku.
Also, Chelsea Handler sideboob. - richirwin, on 04/14/2009, -0/+4That's a fair question.
Something is just a tad off. - smackydoodle, on 04/14/2009, -0/+4no wonder she got that massive contract
- Firespray1138, on 04/14/2009, -1/+5Why the ***** did I think of stars as in actual stars in space when I read the title?
- charlietuna, on 04/14/2009, -0/+4Where was Kathy Bates? She is more of a star than any of these women, or could this be only about T&A?
- xLSDx, on 04/14/2009, -0/+3Anyone can be sexy after the airbrushers get done with it...
- tallulahvulture, on 04/14/2009, -0/+3whats wrong with padmas hands??
-
Show 51 - 100 of 120 discussions
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is