What is Digg?28 Comments
- christoast, on 06/09/2009, -0/+8............................................________
....................................,.-‘”...................``~.,
.............................,.-”...................................“-.,
.........................,/...............................................”:,
.....................,?......................................................\,
.................../...........................................................,}
................./......................................................,:`^`..}
.............../...................................................,:”........./
..............?.....__.........................................:`.........../
............./__.(.....“~-,_..............................,:`........../
.........../(_....”~,_........“~,_....................,:`........_/
..........{.._$;_......”=,_.......“-,_.......,.-~-,},.~”;/....}
...........((.....*~_.......”=-._......“;,,./`..../”............../
...,,,___.\`~,......“~.,....................`.....}............../
............(....`=-,,.......`........................(......;_,,-”
............/.`~,......`-...............................\....../\
.............\`~.*-,.....................................|,./.....\,__
,,_..........}.>-._\...................................|..............`=~-,
.....`=~-,_\_......`\,.................................\
...................`=~-,,.\,...............................\
................................`:,,...........................`\..............__
.....................................`=-,...................,%`>--==``
........................................_\..........._,-%.......`\
...................................,<`.._|_,-&``................`\ - inactive, on 06/09/2009, -0/+6Hey I heard that Governator called Rush Limbaugh a 650 lb. gorilla during the digg dialogg thingy.
- captspaulding, on 06/09/2009, -0/+5As opposed to a book containing talking bushes, talking snakes, and a zombie?
- saltydawkins, on 06/09/2009, -0/+5More than one zombie. Lazarus doesn't get nearly enough press.
- ironeus, on 06/08/2009, -0/+5The slides [art] navigation is function from this page: http://seedmagazine.com/content/article/exhibit_li ...
- gregdigg, on 06/09/2009, -0/+5When you propose a scientific theory that holds up 100 years later, then you can make that comment. As it stands, though, you apparently have trouble putting periods at the end of your sentences.
- Smegzor, on 06/09/2009, -0/+4Endless forms? ***** that! I had to fill in 3 just to post this comment!
- Hetman, on 06/09/2009, -0/+4Do not forget some of them still pretend to drink the blood of that zombie.
- inactive, on 06/09/2009, -0/+3Did you give your kid vaccinations? Thank the study of evolution for it, cause prayer sure as hell didn't kill polio...
Evolution is a real process whether you like it or not. No matter how many lies, mistruths, and non-sequiturs you spout here. Evolution is a real process even if you're offended by it. Evolution is a real process even if you feel it contradicts your religion. The fact of the matter is that evolution is a real process, a proven process - a real part of our objective universe. So, if Truth is something that matters to you, then you cannot 'disbelieve' in evolution or preach against it. Then again, if you don't care about lying, deceiving, and misleading others, then you can obviously do and say whatever you want - regardless of whether it's true or not.
Evolution is biology, the evidence is there for it. The evidence for creation? All you can come up with is 'look around'? Not science, sorry. - inactive, on 06/09/2009, -0/+3@GloryBeToGod: Then He in His eternal grace, made possible for you to be completely wrong.
- Hetman, on 06/09/2009, -0/+3I am honestly confused by people like you. Are you a troll or do honestly believe what you say?
- Wreckage, on 06/09/2009, -0/+3I've always liked "Darwin's Monkey".
- Hetman, on 06/09/2009, -0/+3It is entrenched in our society. It is beautiful just as beautiful as Einsteins theory of relativity. How they saw the truth in the face of countless critics is beyond me. Some people see the truth and pass all the BS.
- INTERNETMASTER, on 06/09/2009, -0/+3I like the one with the grinning cyclops
- sdipaola, on 06/09/2009, -0/+2This is part of the Darwin2009 festival (Richard Darwin, Sir David Attenborough) in Cambridge in July. I have a modern exhibition there, where I use evolutionary genetic to evolve a related family of abstract portrait paintings based on the gaze of the 1883 portrait of Charles Darwin at the Evolved Forms show. The portraits slowly evolve inheriting winning painting strategies from the parent paintings, however since the process is imbued with techniques gleaned from human creativity, portraits can favor wider creative artistic exploration over dogged resemblance.
See www.darwinsgaze.com where you can continue to evolve any portrait in the show through the java app. And if your in the area come by. Nerds making art with computers based on biology ... - inactive, on 06/09/2009, -0/+2Prepare for the most buried comment on digg ever.
- christoast, on 06/09/2009, -0/+1Some people read books, more don't.
- gregdigg, on 06/09/2009, -0/+1It's also functional.
- catvllvs, on 06/09/2009, -0/+1That though is far more clever than numbnuts GloryBeToGod's comment.
- normajeansun, on 06/16/2009, -0/+1What many people do not know, is that Darwin was also a Cousin Couple in procreation and belief. His views on how marriage, sex, relationships and incest should become involved inside society have to this day raised eyebrows across the world. In my Memoir - Norma Jean's Sun, by Kris Allen Courtney - you will find answers to questions and challenge yourself to understand more about yourself and those around you.
Charles Darwin & Emma Wedgewood: A Cousin Couple
"When the principles of breeding and of inheritance are better understood, we shall not hear
ignorant members of our legislature rejecting with scorn a plan for ascertaining by an easy
method whether or not consanguineous marriages are injurious to man."
Charles Darwin (1871)
Please visit www.kriscourtney.com and be sure to get a copy of Norma Jean's Sun, Memoir. - andyb747, on 10/08/2009, -0/+1truth?!
- brassknizz, on 06/09/2009, -1/+1To be honest... I'm sick of Darwin getting all of the credit. There were quite a few scientists at the time with similar notions (not to mention some of them collaborated).
"If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I have stood on the shoulders of giants." -Newton - ByronT, on 06/09/2009, -2/+2I was gonna post a clever comment, but now I gotta go poo!
- sdipaola, on 06/09/2009, -2/+1One reason that Darwin is so celebrated (like this Darwin2009 festival) is because one scientist usually does not get so much right. Not as time passes, usually they get the main thing right but then others as early as right away but as years pass add to the initial theory. But Darwin got way way way more right the first time - why - well he was a meticulous nerd, but it might be he knew how controversial his work would be, especially to the religious people close to him. So for 10 years, held off on publishing he questioned and refined everything, over and over again. By the time it came out it was dead on (150 years ago this year).
- inactive, on 06/09/2009, -4/+1I saw this on Fox news
- 123bucklemyshoe, on 06/09/2009, -5/+1This story is great. I completely agree and Darwin's ideas about natural selection have traveled FAAAR since his time. I think these pictures really represent Darwin too. I'm extremely interested in science and programming and I've studied it in college and this is extremely good material. I'm going to digg it right after I post this.
- inactive, on 06/09/2009, -7/+0Anything is possible due to His presence. It's not an argument, it's fact.
- inactive, on 06/09/2009, -11/+0Oh please. Darwin is a load of crud.
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is