What is Digg?Sponsored by HTC
Who knows you better than your phone? view!
youtube.com - See you from the perspective of your phone.
79 Comments
- LuciferChaos, on 10/10/2007, -0/+76Its a fake rumor:
http://digg.com/apple/Debunk_punk_kid_tries_to_dupe_gadget_blogs_with_phony_Apple_rumor
http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/05/debunk-punk-kid-tries-to-dupe-gadget-blogs-with-phony-apple-rum/ - mrfreeziexp, on 10/10/2007, -2/+53This has already been proven fake. http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/05/debunk-punk-kid-tries-to-dupe-gadget-blogs-with-phony-apple-rum/
- jigga, on 10/10/2007, -1/+43Confirmed false.
Buried - vol872791, on 10/10/2007, -2/+40Read the actual story and stop digging this. It's false.
- jollyholly, on 10/10/2007, -10/+42If Steve Jobs can read this, I'm holding out for a 13" MacBook Pro..
- totorototoro, on 10/10/2007, -3/+30Way to check those sources before publishing, Gizmodo :p
- Jimgress, on 10/10/2007, -0/+16More inaccurate ***** frontpaged on digg because everyone just diggs the story without reading it and moves on. Maybe clicking the link should be mandatory before digging cause I'm sick of this sort of thing happening.
- Pliep, on 10/10/2007, -2/+11inaccurate and BUSTED!
- jurvusbob, on 10/10/2007, -0/+9don't worry, this report is untrue. you probably wont be obsolete for another few weeks ;)
- modifiedbears, on 10/10/2007, -1/+10If this doesn't get buried as inaccurate it just proves how broken digg is.
- fuzzmeister, on 10/10/2007, -1/+10Congratulations, want a cookie?
- cassarani, on 10/10/2007, -2/+9Perhaps someone should wait for a confirmation before submitting a story to Digg. Or gizmodo, engadget, etc. should stop spreading false news. I'm really sick of seeing inaccurate stories making it to the first page on Digg anyway.
- DigitalN, on 10/10/2007, -0/+7why is this still on the homepage?
- gmorse81, on 10/10/2007, -0/+6How many people actually go to the link and visit the site? This is a hoax and yet people still digg it.
- Valhalla, on 10/10/2007, -0/+6even the link itself says it turned out to be BS
- Matrix_Prime, on 10/10/2007, -1/+7why are people still digging this??? Why?
- GonadHunter, on 10/10/2007, -1/+7Its perfect marketing if they can get so much buzz from such an apparently small announcement. Its what creates successful companies.
- kerrybreyette, on 10/10/2007, -1/+6why on earth is this still being dugg?
- las3rjock, on 10/10/2007, -0/+5An unsubstantiated rumor could turn out to be true, but that just makes it a lucky coincidence, not an accurate prediction.
- Lacero, on 10/10/2007, -0/+5Like the Paris Hilton inheritance story... There is no wisdom of the crowds. Crowds, by and large, are morons.
- fishbert, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3So, this inaccurate story is 13.5 hours old, still has more diggs than the 11.5 hour old story that debunks it... and the kicker: it's still on the front page, with no notice about possibly being inaccurate.
The 'bury' buttons... they do nothing!!!
Digg is broken. Time to tweak the algorithms. - aaryn, on 10/10/2007, -1/+4beh, they will probably be the same price just better specs, my guess at least.
- Mikecol, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3They'll let you trade up.
- addybaddy, on 10/10/2007, -6/+9Yes, it's false. It sounds logical, though.
- theprez, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3"Updated: The source is rotten. Googling the tipster's email shows him to be a fraud. This story is being 100% retracted.- BLam"
So it's been proven to be an inaccurate source, but the guess should be pretty on the spot. An iMac redesign has been rumored for months now. - buba69, on 10/10/2007, -1/+4Fraud...no digg
- thcobbs, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3No, the lesson is go look at their refurbs the day of an update.
- TaterSalad77, on 10/10/2007, -1/+4Bury this story. Get it off the front page
- WelshSage, on 10/10/2007, -1/+4buried...false
- daven1986, on 10/10/2007, -1/+4tbh they aren't that overpriced compared to pcs. they just aren't as upgradeable.
- DigitalN, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2because it has mac in the title.
- moofer, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2Where have you seen anything about a huge conference? It is neither huge, nor a conference.
- martinbogo, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2For pete's sake ... would people please BURY this story? It's been proven to be a hoax, links are provided all over the commentary. We have the power to bury bad articles .. use it!
- Firehed, on 10/10/2007, -1/+3Nothing's confirmed until Tuesday, though I'm not denying the existence of refuting evidence.
- sdubois92, on 10/10/2007, -1/+3very bad journalism. you do not post something unless you are 100% sure it is true.
- Tippis, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2Headless iMac? Isn't the whole point of the iMac that it is *only* a head ;)
But yes, a mid-range but still upgradable unit would be very handy. - NeoRicen, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2Buried as inaccurate.
- loudmouth11, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1why would u get one now with new stuff coming whatever it is
- manitoba98xp, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1The announcement said it's Mac-related. So no iPod, no iPhone.
- inactive, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1"Doesn't tell no one"?
Log off, Uncle Kracker. - streak, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1Be sure to Bury Inaccurate. "Inaccurate" is the only bury function that gets stuff yanked, but only if enough people do it.
Some people seem to know this. A great blog by Chris Pirillo about his 180 degree conversion to the iPhone seems to have gotten buried just before it made it to the front page. - HA5TY, on 10/10/2007, -2/+3buried
- stang966, on 10/10/2007, -2/+3Fanboy tools have been pwnd!
- kahlessreborn, on 10/10/2007, -2/+3Confirmed to be totally untrue.
- JSolo, on 10/10/2007, -4/+5We'll find out shortly how accurate these leaks are. More info on the next gen iPod would be welcome, specifically storage and form factor changes since the UI is obviously going to be a carry over from the iPhone.
- manitoba98xp, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1The announcement said it's Mac-related. So no iPod, no iPhone.
- inactive, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1Shape and size.
It's marketing-speak. - padfoot, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1'cuz' you are planning to get one, I'm sure Steve will announce them sooner. Just for you!
- fishbert, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1I think the fact that this story is still not marked as 'possibly inaccurate' disproves your assertion.
-
Show 51 - 80 of 80 discussions
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is