digg

Join DiggAbout

The Digg Crew wants to hear your thoughts!
Please take our short survey about Digg and potential feature ideas.

Apple Earnings Grow 88 Percent Year-over-Year; Stock SOARING

biz.yahoo.com — CUPERTINO, Calif., April 25 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Apple ® today announced financial results for its fiscal 2007 second quarter ended March 31, 2007. The Company posted revenue of $5.26 billion and net quarterly profit of $770 million, or $.87 per diluted share. These results compare to revenue of $4.36 billion and net quarterly profit of $410 mi

show profanity settings
expand all
  • mrl14, on 10/12/2007, -20/+25incredible!
    • Tmacman, on 10/12/2007, -14/+9This is amazing, because the stock price always goes down when Apple comes out with good news. What's going on? This must be Bizarro world.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bizarro_World
    • Quix, on 10/12/2007, -6/+42We'll see what tomorrow brings - I've become used to watching AAPL drop after great earnings reports. Strange. To own AAPL one needs an iron stomach.

      Nonetheless, this is a great day for Apple. And a bad day for flag564.

      Can't wait to see how well the iPhone does.
    • blackmassacer, on 10/12/2007, -0/+4@quix Thats because after a stock suddenly goes up some people will sell a portion of their holdings in order to make some immediate profit but shouldn't ever result in a very heavy dip. it will most likely be down like 2-3 percent on friday
    • airwalkery2k, on 10/12/2007, -0/+33Don't you just wish that instead of buying that iPod way back when, you bought 50 shares of Apple instead?
    • Zippo, on 10/12/2007, -5/+3boom!
    • mwosh, on 10/12/2007, -0/+14I've owned AAPL for about 3 years now and have seen amazing results. I only wish I had more money to invest.

      You can't watch it day to day though. Otherwise you'll be tempted to sell at least twice a week.
    • johnnybluejeans, on 10/12/2007, -1/+4Funny to read these responses. This morning I thought to myself, "Uh oh, it's earnings day... Better not look at my Apple shares for a couple weeks or so." Having purchased the stock a few years ago at $16 (split adjusted) per share I've seen it tumble every single earnings call even though each brought news of record breaking profits.

      I got a call from my father (who has been kicking himself for not investing in Apple even though I constantly tell him to) this evening. "You still have your shares of Apple?" ... My heart sinks, I can only think of the great drop he is about to tell me about.

      "$101 a share this evening"
    • Justin6512, on 10/12/2007, -5/+2"starbucks"
    • Ireland, on 10/12/2007, -5/+12I just sold all my shares in AAPL!! I'm typing this on my brand new 2.33 MacBook Pro in my internet ready Airwolf helicopter, flying over Vegas getting my dick sucked by two bitches!!!
    • twit987, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1AAPL will open @ +$10 tomorrow. :)

      Maybe hit $135 by years end?
    • TheMacThinker, on 10/12/2007, -2/+1OK you wanna know how to make money on Apple's stocks without having to purchase the stocks?
      Only on trick, buy Apple options a week before earning. You'll see the stock progressively rise until earning (93 to 95 this week) and suddently right after earning announcement you'll see the stock sky rock (from 95 to 102 last night after hours trading), and this provided of course that Apple continues to beat estimates by a significant amount and continue to innovate.
      I bought a few contacts last week and I am just waiting to cash in today when everyone will rally on the stock!
      --------------
      http://www.mostofmymac.com
  • mvanhorn, on 10/12/2007, -3/+24up to $102.81 in after hours trading right now
    • FABC, on 10/12/2007, -3/+5It will drop back below 100 tomorrow or pre-market when people start cashing in their profit...
    • superkendall, on 10/12/2007, -3/+10And then back up to $102 and beyond when people realize what the stock can reach if the iPhone is a big hit, or AppleTV is a big hit, or laptops continue to be a big hit, or if iPods continue to be a big hit.

      That's why the P/E is high, because Apple has a lot of irons in the fire and only a few of them need to really succeed to keep propelling Apple forward with great velocity.
  • VCAT, on 10/12/2007, -7/+27Hmm, could apple's new growth segment be from *gasp* computers? (36% growth in macs vs year ago quarter)
    • wonderchemist, on 10/12/2007, -5/+11Compared to an *only* 24% increase in iPods vs. to the year-ago quarter.
    • mgkwho, on 10/12/2007, -18/+3Isn't it also in the 30s compared to the PC market as a whole?

      LMAO: Shaw Wu and his predictions-from-rumor sites was wining about Japan market share.

      -=|Mgkwho
    • Sagags, on 10/12/2007, -2/+13If only my grandparents listened to me, I told them they should sell there shares of Hilton Hotels and invest them in Apple in January before mac world, if only the listened to me......
    • zackkitzmiller, on 10/12/2007, -2/+5-=|Mgkwho

      I wish there was a block list for every form on the internet. If there was, you'd be on it.
    • bbrosemer, on 10/12/2007, -1/+2Yeah I dropped all of my other stock and put it in Apple a week before MacWorld...
    • aaronm67, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1@bbrosemer

      How much money are you talking about? If it's any decent amount, it's a terrible idea to put all of your money in the same stock, no matter what is announced.
  • autoy, on 10/12/2007, -6/+21Now, put those earnings into hiring more developers.
    • Quix, on 10/12/2007, -5/+22Yes, because Microsoft's software has always shined due to its vast programmer horde. :|

      I say take some of that money in the bank and drop the prices of entry-level Macs. It's time for a serious market share push (though not through self-destructive massive price slashing a la Dell).
    • kelly, on 10/12/2007, -20/+12Quix,

      I don't see how they could drop the price any more than they do. Apple's entry-level macs already cost less than an equally equipped PC when comparing hardware, software and OS.
    • wonderchemist, on 10/12/2007, -2/+15If 1 developer can code a subroutine in 8 hours, how long will it take 10,000 developers?
    • treed, on 10/12/2007, -0/+26wonderchemist: About a year.
    • GMorgan, on 10/12/2007, -2/+16"If 1 developer can code a subroutine in 8 hours, how long will it take 10,000 developers?"

      A year, they'd spend that long arguing over which IDE to use. At some point somebody would just go ahead and do it in Vi.

      @kelly

      I call ***** on that.
    • Zippo, on 10/12/2007, -0/+5Entry level... like the Mac Mini and 17" iMac...?
    • frostieDude, on 10/12/2007, -0/+7@autoy
      Until their new campus is finished, they might have a hard time finding places for a bunch of new developers to sit.
    • kelly, on 10/12/2007, -6/+4GMorgan,

      build an equal machine... and get back to me.

      And no that doesn't mean a machine that is equipped with less thus allowing you to spend less. I'm talking equal in every area... including hardware, as well as software and OS equivilents and you will see that the Mac is at worst equally price and at best less expensive.
    • lordryan, on 10/12/2007, -0/+7developers....developers...developers! YES!
    • TheCount, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Doesn't matter how many developer's Apple hires, there is only one Steve Jobs and he has to put his fingerprints on everything before it happens.
  • WiseWeasel, on 10/12/2007, -10/+5C'mon $100/share... Ma children need wine!
    • knelto, on 10/12/2007, -5/+3After hours seems to be coming down some, but it's still doing well. I do think over $100/share is getting a little up there. I've been thinking that if Apple were smart, they'd do a 2:1 split sometime before the iPhone's release. It'd make the stock affordable, but leave a lot of room for growth. I think last time the split in '05, it only took 11 months to reach the pre-split price (i.e. double).
    • Harry, on 10/12/2007, -6/+4Lol.... a split wouldn't affect the stock at all.... It's a completely arbitrary act.
    • CraigJ, on 10/12/2007, -1/+2@harry - you are correct, however a lower per share price, for whatever psychological reason induces people to buy more shares therefore driving the price (as a percentage) up.
  • u8myfoood, on 10/12/2007, -22/+6what goes up must come down.
    • superkendall, on 10/12/2007, -1/+6Try short selling tomorrow if you really believe your philosophy.
    • DharmaTurtle, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Er.... microsoft?
    • johnpaul191, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1yeah.... if they do another split. they've done two 2:1 splits in the last 6 or 7 years. look at the long term results of Apple in the last 10 years and it's been a well performing stock. the numbers speak for themselves. it's had dips, but that happens. the big dive in 2001 was market-wide due to obvious outside forces.

      http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=AAPL&t=my
  • monosyth, on 10/12/2007, -3/+3when did the Hot News Ticker disappear on Apple's website? It looks odd without it...
    • madmoose, on 10/12/2007, -1/+2I certainly saw it just a few hours ago. Curious.
    • TeatimeGrommit, on 10/12/2007, -1/+2@ harry

      Stock splits are an important tool. Ordinary people might think of buying 10 shares, or 1 share, but on the trading floor the stock is traded in blocks. (A block being 100 shares, as I recall) One would rather have a standard "block" of stock be in the realm of "impulse buy" for traders rather than out of reach.
  • masterofNone, on 10/12/2007, -6/+12karma in action. treat your customers right (i.e. provide thoughtful products with great industrial design form factors, apply rigorous standards of conduct within your product's ecosystem, weed out predatory software products, provide a secure environment) and your customers will reward you with increased sales, word of mouth advertising, true loyalty, and ongoing affection for your brand.
    • santaliqueur, on 10/12/2007, -3/+9I agree with what you say, except with the word 'karma'. It's just good business.
    • cliffzdude, on 10/12/2007, -3/+10"apply rigorous standards of conduct within your product's ecosystem"

      Next up, the word "paradigm" for no apparent reason.
  • Narkinbarf, on 10/12/2007, -7/+4If Steve Jobs uses Digg I want him to know I'd really like a new laptop. I figured I'd ask seeing that they have some extra money laying around.
    • bigtizzle, on 10/12/2007, -1/+11"Change? Spare change? Spare some change?"
  • macbookpromat, on 10/12/2007, -7/+2Talk about obvious news.
  • lopla, on 10/12/2007, -21/+9Apple and Linux are on the verge of toppling MSFT. Face it all MSFT has is the xbox360 and it doesn't even make good money. They have Zune which is a total bomb, and they have Vista which is the biggest disappointment in OS history, I mean jesus Dell has reverted to selling XP again because Vista sucks so bad. XP was a good OS and they should have built on that, instead they tried to copy OSX, failed and are now caught in the middle of a cluster *****. No wonder Bill is getting the hell out of there. I work for a firm that has 280,000 desktops running XP and they are testing Linux as the next step. Once the corporate space finally ditches MSFT it's WAY over for them.
    • santaliqueur, on 10/12/2007, -5/+13I love ramblings that sound like they came from a 7th grader hopped up on energy drinks.
    • colincornaby, on 10/12/2007, -2/+16Microsoft isn't going anywhere while Microsoft Office is around.
    • ThinkFr33ly, on 10/12/2007, -13/+6Wow. That was borderline retarded.

      "Apple and Linux are on the verge of toppling MSFT."

      Um. Ya. Not even close. On any measure.

      "Face it all MSFT has is the xbox360 and it doesn't even make good money."

      Really? Wow. I though they were a software company that makes upwards of 15 billion a year in profit.

      "They have Zune which is a total bomb"

      Ya. And it's also a very minor product in their lineup. Unlike Apple, which relies almost entirely on the sale of their iPods to make any money.

      "and they have Vista which is the biggest disappointment in OS history, I mean jesus Dell has reverted to selling XP again because Vista sucks so bad. XP was a good OS and they should have built on that, instead they tried to copy OSX, failed and are now caught in the middle of a cluster *****."

      If you had used Vista, you would know it's actually a pretty damn good OS. And, by this time next year, will undoubtedly have massive market share if by OEMs alone. Dell started offering XP on some of their low-end models. They, in fact, did the same thing for Windows 2000 vs XP for several months after XP's release. It was a non-story then, and it's a non-story now. Not sure how Vista copies OS X. It looks nothing like it, and it certainly feels nothing like it.

      "I work for a firm that has 280,000 desktops running XP and they are testing Linux as the next step. Once the corporate space finally ditches MSFT it's WAY over for them."

      Good luck with that, buddy. Windows Server has done nothing but gain marketshare at the expense of companies like Sun. Office 2007 is one of the fastest selling version of Office in history. Correcting for Vista being sold after the holiday season was already over, it's doing very well.

      In fact, there are many more current Vista users than there are OS X users. Have fun with that. Hope your head doesn't explode.
    • aristotle0dude, on 10/12/2007, -0/+6@colincornaby: You are right. MSFT Stock has been stagnant around 30 bucks a share since the last 2:1 split in February of 2003. Not a whole lot of activity although they have been paying out dividends every few months.
    • masterofNone, on 10/12/2007, -0/+7"Microsoft isn't going anywhere while Microsoft Office is around."
      yeah... well... microsoft hasn't been going anywhere since about 1993... so, y'know.
    • frostieDude, on 10/12/2007, -1/+13@lopla

      Microsoft does seem to be not having the best time right now to say the least. And it is true that pretty much everything they do loses money except: Windows, Office, SQL, and Exchange.

      However, they are still quite profitable and technology companies that have a good sized install base have very long glide paths when they do start to decline.

      Apple may kick their ass in the home/consumer market - and is pretty much on the way to doing that, but the home/consumer market has never been Microsoft's strength. Unfortunately for MS, they seem to want to try to grow the company by moving into markets outside of their core competency and just aren't succeeding. This is nothing new for them. For example, they tried and failed to kill Intuit (Quicken) with Microsoft Money. They tried and failed to kill AOL. Google appeared overnight and kicked their asses even after they supposedly woke up and recognized the importance of the internet.

      My prediction is that Microsoft will not be able to stop Apple's growth in home/consumer space. Apple will win in multimedia. Microsoft will continue to dominate the business world and Linux will be their main competitor there.

      Apple is becoming the new Sony.
      Microsoft is becoming the new IBM.
      IBM has become the new EDS.
      Sony has become the new Atari.
      Nintendo has become the new Nintendo.
    • stevealford, on 10/12/2007, -12/+0@ lopla: I love when people call like you the Zune a failure, or as you put it "a total bomb." I guess you don't realize that it has a higher market share for media players than Apple does for computers and it has a faster growth rate since it came out than Mac computers have had over that time. I have a MacPro Quad Xeon and a dual core XP Media Center, so I'm not a fanboy of either company... just pointing out how ***** stupid you are. I also DON'T own an iPod or a Zune, so I don't know nor care which is better, but neither is a "failure."
    • zunipus, on 10/12/2007, -0/+5Don't count your failures before they hatch. MS has lots of money to burn through before they hit bankruptcy.

      Also, this 'MS are a gonna die!' routine is so deja vu of all the death knells that have been rung regarding Apple. They are meaningless. I fully expect MS will be around screwing over the world for many years to come. Believe me, I think the sooner MS are gone the sooner the computer world can move on into a better future. They clearly have been a parasite upon us all and have held us back, here in the Stone Age of Computing. But plan on them sticking around, floundering though they are.

      What is actually more predictable is a stockholder coup, throwing out the current management and bringing in a new MS management culture. This is usually the result of stagnating stock. And MS stock is most definitely stagnating, despite all of Ballmer's attempts to break into new markets that can actually turn a profit.
  • zunipus, on 10/12/2007, -9/+6The other shoe here, that is in the process of dropping, is just how poorly Vista has sold 'FOR REAL' in the market place (as opposed to the bogus measure Microsoft use of how many copies were installed on reseller boxes).

    Clearly Vista made NO DENT in Apple's Mac sales. One could perhaps even say that Vista spurred higher growth in Mac sales, looking at these figures!

    :-D
    • hdtvdust, on 10/12/2007, -20/+2Of course, your are a ***** idiot with no sense of business. Mac sales are NOT increasing. The market share is the same. Vista has a higher market sahare than OS X alreay. How sad.

      By the wya, worthless *****...NO ONE expected Vista to take away Mac sales. You see, when you have 90% of the market already, you really don't CARE about taking some share away from the 3% people.
    • steamedlice, on 10/12/2007, -7/+8Microsoft could not possibly make a dent in Apple's sales at this point. MS blew their lead years ago and now they are simply dying by attrition... one Mac at a time.
    • hdtvdust, on 10/12/2007, -6/+3by your logic, Apple can't count it when people buy Macs with OS X pre-installed as a sale.

      Seriously...what a ***** idiot you are.
    • superkendall, on 10/12/2007, -1/+7By saying no-one expected Vista to take away from Mac sales, you are also saying that Macs are better than Vista - or otherwise the larger base of software would draw some people away. Are you sure you are saying what you want to be saying?
  • hdtvdust, on 10/12/2007, -11/+3Stock soaring? It is the same as it was in January. zero return on invenstment. May as well sew your money in your mattress.
    • superkendall, on 10/12/2007, -1/+7Actually even right after the iPhone announcement, the stock only ever reached $97 or so - and then it took a nap after. Even if you had bought in then, and the very zenith of the buying, when any fool could see buying was a bad idea - even then you'd still be making money now, almost $5 a share in after hours. And what do you think the stock might do when the iPhone actually arrives? (Rhetorical question since I know you imagine there is no way the iPhone can succeed despite demand from many quarters).
  • HDFury, on 10/12/2007, -14/+5I wonder if the stock soar is just another apple exec getting his "back-dated stock options." Companies love to do this because it makes the shareholders happy. Apple is making progress, I'm not trying to take that away from them but if you think this all has to do with the sales of iPods and iMacs then you are seriously disturbed.

    @Kelly

    The price of a Mac is nowhere near as cheap as the price of an equal Windows Machine. I can go to Fry's Electronics and build a machine that would stomp the iMacs for about 700 bucks and their cheapest one is $999.......they could use a price drop if they want the market share.
    • ZebraCrew, on 10/12/2007, -1/+2of course it's cheaper if you build it yourself! do you not understand that it takes money for corporations to assemble the product? i think that if you look at windows machines from other corporations it would be similar in price with comparable specs(not much lower if at all).
    • kelly, on 10/12/2007, -2/+8Actually the DIY machines don't have any price advantage.

      The only way that you could build a machine that would "stomp" the iMac (or any Mac for that matter) is if you bought less and spent less.... or bought the parts that were most important to you. That makes the PC more flexible and is definitely a worthy attribute but it doesn't make it less expensive.

      The ONLY way you can price a PC for less money is if you equip it with less, or equip it differently than any of the Macintosh configurations that Apple provides.

      Here are some examples:
      http://www.systemshootouts.org/
    • acebrickman, on 10/12/2007, -1/+3you've already bought your version of windows, haven't you...

      Think about purchasing the OS for the first time and get back to us, k?
    • deadbaby, on 10/12/2007, -0/+3"The price of a Mac is nowhere near as cheap as the price of an equal Windows Machine"

      ...and a meal at Burger King is cheaper than a meal at a five star restaurant. Don't be so quick to dismiss the appeal of quality.

      There will always be people who just want the cheapest machine out there but, increasingly, there are a lot of people who don't mind spending an extra $200 to get some extra perks.
    • kelly, on 10/12/2007, -0/+3You're not paying extra for quality. That's just icing on the cake.

      You're paying LESS for higher quality but you have fewer options to choose from.
    • HDFury, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1You guys must be the same ones that tout that the Mac doesn't have any viruses or security flaws too huh?
      You guys are more gullible than Sony Fan Boys!!!
  • 3fiddyz, on 10/12/2007, -3/+12Well done Apple, build a better product and they will come. I am certainly a recent convert, and shortly will be getting my first Apple. I hope they keep making good profit and it is put into developing even better products.
    • superkendall, on 10/12/2007, -2/+7That has been the key so far, Apple has been very good at understanding the importance of R&D and adding value to products across the line.
  • djphatjive, on 10/12/2007, -11/+2Yea until the STEVE JOBS stock scandal hits!!!!!!
    • superkendall, on 10/12/2007, -1/+10I guess you missed the news that the whole thing blew over. Put away the balloons man, that whole thing is done.
  • Oktober, on 10/12/2007, -12/+1Wow, apple's market share increased to...5%?

    So much for iPods driving Mac sales.

    Seriously though, more businesses are just waiting for Vista SP1 than anything else, "switching" isn't even an option. Using Macs in a large enterprise is a gigantic pain in the ass.

    IAMSE

    (I am a Mac System Admin)
    • Lynn, on 10/12/2007, -8/+1Mac share still below 3%.
    • zunipus, on 10/12/2007, -1/+8Mac market share in 'The World' is indeed about 3% according to what I have read.

      But in the USA it was over to 6% this past fall according to Gartner, who BTW absolutely hate Apple. So if Garner say it, it has to be so factual they can't deny it. Recently there have been quotations of 5% market share in the USA. I have no idea why different stats companies disagree on something as simple as market share. Anyway, I think this 5% figure will be moved up once these new Mac sales figures have been considered.
    • zunipus, on 10/12/2007, -2/+6"Seriously though, more businesses are just waiting for Vista SP1 than anything else,"

      That is a good point. I definitely agree. There are over 500 listed bugs in this first release of Vista, and a considerable list of incompatibility problems. There are other problems as well, but you get the idea.

      " "switching" isn't even an option. Using Macs in a large enterprise is a gigantic pain in the ass."

      No actually. Macs are less expensive to support than Windows PC machines by a ratio as high as 10:1. Switching is not only an option, it saves money and provides ease of use and support.

      Where the Mac is NOT useful in the Enterprise is the fact that most of the Enterprise specific applications have only been written to work with Windows. I personally find this to be a complex subject, and I can understand the follow-the-herd behavior that is inherent here.

      But the fact is that IF Windows PC machine can be replaced by Macs in any Enterprise environment it ALWAYS pays off. This has been shown countless times in professional studies.

      Pre-Mac OS X 10.4 Apple have done some major blundering supporting Microsoft networking protocols. In one respect this is Apple's fault. They kept 'saying' that earlier versions of MOSX worked perfectly in Windows networks, and yet they kept messing up. Thus the consistent market for software like 'DAVE' that actually fixed what Apple had screwed up. But you also have to point a finger at Microsoft, who absolutely love to hide APIs from everyone, including Windows developers, to their own benefit. Developers like Apple have to do a lot of guesswork to figure out how perfect compatibility. Thankfully Mac OS X 10.4 finally got it and has had no major problems working with Windows networks.

      "IAMSE
      (I am a Mac System Admin)"

      After proving your ignorance in your statement quoted above, I would not advertise yourself as a Mac System Admin. You clearly need some training. I pity the folks you work for, if indeed you are not trolling us with a lie.
    • Lynn, on 10/12/2007, -5/+3@zunipus

      Mac has a 2.7% share worldwide. PCs are on pace to sell 255 Million units in 2007. Apple will need to sell 6.88 Million units in 2007 just to maintain the 2.7% share. Apple is on pace to sell 6.4 Million units so they will end the year at 2.5% share. A drop not an increase.
  • laserblazer, on 10/12/2007, -9/+2Pump and dump imminent.

    Sell quick.
  • origclubsoda, on 10/12/2007, -3/+1And I own that stock too!
  • lopla, on 10/12/2007, -4/+18Same old story. Apple/Linux fans diss msft fans. Microsoft fans froth at the mouth and have seizures. Pretty funny considering our market share to be irrelevant yet they are in here frothing and driven to the point of unbridled rage. Love every second of it.

    Yours Truly,
    Vista Sucks
  • JoeSobieski, on 10/12/2007, -9/+3Apple's computer sale drops for the second quarter in a row

    Q3 2006: 1,610,000
    Q4 2006: 1,606,000
    Q1 2007: 1,517,000
    • astrosmash, on 10/12/2007, -3/+3Leopard effect.

      Didn't affect their bottom line, obviously, as other people predicted. Watch out when Leopard is released!
    • tandytk9, on 10/12/2007, -1/+8It's a shame they canceled March Christmas this year, isn't it Joe?
    • moudig, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2Not even Leopard effect.
      Cyclic sales.
      Q4 (July-September): Back-to-school
      Q1 (October-December): X-mas
      Q2, Q3: weak quarters

      Strongest quarter for macs - usually Q4, closely followed by Q1
  • bimtott, on 10/12/2007, -4/+13Buried as duplicate story (every fiscal year since 199x...)
  • scotticus, on 10/12/2007, -8/+3This news is making me hotter and hotter for Steve. I so want to tongue his hairy balls right now.
    • 8177, on 10/12/2007, -6/+2His balls arent hairy. They're smoother then a 17" imac.
  • Incognito, on 10/12/2007, -9/+1Woo! Pass the Kool-aid!

    "Goes back to playing recently released games on the P.C"
    • Aleks, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2I know there's only 5% of us but we don't give a ***** about ***** games.
  • BLACKEAGLE, on 10/12/2007, -7/+1ya and yet i still dont want a mac
  • robshoy, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2Apple is just teasing my vision that one days Macs will overpower PC's in market share, that's all. T_T
  • BLACKEAGLE, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1wow compared to MS this aint *****
  • nodar, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Wether or not you are an apple fan it's a smart idea to invest in it.
  •  

    Login or register to add a comment

    Create a new account or login to join in the conversation on Digg. You'll also be able to Digg stories to help promote things you like.


© Digg Inc. 2008 — Content posted by Digg users is dedicated to the public domain.
DIGG, DIGG IT, DUGG, DIGG THIS, Digg graphics, logos, designs, page headers, button icons, scripts, and other service names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.