Digg

The Digg Crew wants to hear your thoughts!
Please take our short survey about Digg and potential feature ideas.

See the original image at charlotteconservative.com —

Ron Paul Attacked Locally

charlotteconservative.com — “Dr. Paul has always put his country first, much to his own degredation. For 20 years he has been mocked and scorned in Congress by his peers. As a Presidential candidate he has been called a clown, a joke, a kook, a terrorist-sympathizer, a racist and every other epithet that enemies of freedom could come up with. And yet he persists.

Bury

kfed2 281 days ago

33 diggs
digg it

8 Comments
Who Dugg It?

kfed2, on 02/15/2008, -3/+10He isn’t getting anything out of this for himself, other than the satisfaction that he is helping preserve the freedoms of his countrymen and his posterity. He’s going all the way to the Republican convention to fight for us and our beliefs, in spite of the odds against him winning. That is integrity.
- ncairns, on 02/16/2008, -8/+3*****.
  
  I'm an atheist who supports gay rights, the separation of church and state and a woman's right to control her body.
  
  Ron Paul doesn't give a ***** my beliefs. In fact, he wants to allow states to attack them and prevent the Supreme Court from protecting them. That's not integrity. It's ***** cowardice.
  
  The only reason he has yet to concede, barring the relatively likely possibility that he's actually senile, is to prolong the collective hummer his followers have been administering for the past few months.
  - jrskblx125, on 02/16/2008, -2/+6hes completely for gay rights... and seperation of church and state, but something tells me we have bigger fish to fry than abortion. but its not his place to make a law about it... its the states, thats what the constitution says... so stop whining or move.
    - ncairns, on 02/16/2008, -5/+2No. He's not.
      
      Read the 'We the People Act'.
      - tsos2, on 02/18/2008, -0/+1First, are you even an American? If not why the hell are you even sticking your nose into American issues?
        
        "If made law, the Act would forbid federal courts (including the Supreme Court) from hearing cases on subjects such as the display of religious text and imagery on government property, abortion, sexual practices, and same-sex marriage, unless those cases were a challenge to the constitutionality of federal law. It would also make federal court decisions on those subjects non-binding as precedent in state courts, and would prohibit federal courts from spending any money to enforce their judgments."
        
        I don't see any gay bashing anywhere, does anyone else? All I see is an effort to get the federal government out of our business.
  - jeffiek, on 02/16/2008, -1/+4What does Paul's position have to do with someone from AUSTRALIA?
    
    "In fact, he wants to allow states to attack them and prevent the Supreme Court from protecting them. That's not integrity. It's ***** cowardice."
    
    OR
    
    He wants to allow the states to defend them and prevent the Supreme Court from exceeding its jurisdiction. That's not your normal political double talk. Thats bravery.
    
    Your comment supports mob rule. My comment supports the rule of law.
Stryder81, on 02/16/2008, -0/+1Tom Tancredo?! WTF?!
MrXfromPlanetX, on 02/18/2008, -0/+1Tom Tancredo? Digg, must have pulled up some miscellaneous image on the page. At any rate, Ron Paul needs our help to hold onto this seat. Donate what ever you can http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/Ron_Paul_s_Congr ...
Login or register to add a comment

Create a new account or login to join in the conversation on Digg. You'll also be able to Digg stories to help promote things you like.

Ron Paul Attacked Locally

Login or register to add a comment