Discover and share the best of the web!
Learn more about Digg by taking the tour.
Prominent Jewish Dems Attack McCain's "Strength" On Iran
huffingtonpost.com — Several of Congress' most prominent Jewish members are set to go after John McCain on an issue of perceived strength: his proclaimed "toughness" in dealing with Iran. "John McCain has been arguing that he is Mr. Tough Guy on Iran...but when it came to deciding to be tough on Iran or supporting Halliburton, he stuck with Halliburton.
- 740 diggs
- digg it
- thejoshuablog, on 06/26/2008, -17/+12Take 'em down, boys.
- Opiate, on 06/27/2008, -1/+2..
- grlykool, on 06/26/2008, -14/+23McHypocrite
- masterm1nd, on 06/27/2008, -8/+8Honestly, the McStupidNames are getting old, and really do make it look like a majority of Obama supporters live in their parents basements.
- WikiEasy, on 06/27/2008, -9/+3Actually... they do live in their parents' basements.
- masterm1nd, on 06/27/2008, -7/+3I know, but it would be a good idea to at least pretend like they're a functioning adult.
- Wartyboskfapped, on 06/27/2008, -5/+4So how do those jibes rise above people using the McStupidNames gags? Oh, right, they don't.
IOKIYAAR
masterm1nd: always wrong, always proving it. - masterm1nd, on 06/27/2008, -6/+3Warty, you do realize how ironic and hypocritical your comment is, right? And what exactly am I wrong about here, are the McStupidNames NOT getting old? Is it NOT childish? Does it make you guys look intelligent? Your lingo and memes are blowing my mind.
Wartyskipboard: always making hypocritical, irrelevant, and pointless comments. - winmywii, on 06/27/2008, -4/+3McStupid is not as bad as libtard.
- flashback99, on 06/27/2008, -5/+2Kids, go to your room and let the adults do the talking.
- truspect0r, on 06/27/2008, -0/+8McGeneralize
- masterm1nd, on 06/27/2008, -8/+1Hahaha, the famous Microsoft shill supports Obama, go figure.
- flashback99, on 06/27/2008, -1/+5"If you're not with us, you MUST be for the opposition"
for a mastermind, you sure made a huge thinking error - zombies187, on 06/28/2008, -0/+3dugg for McStupidNames.
- WikiEasy, on 06/27/2008, -9/+3Actually... they do live in their parents' basements.
- masterm1nd, on 06/27/2008, -8/+8Honestly, the McStupidNames are getting old, and really do make it look like a majority of Obama supporters live in their parents basements.
- fuzzybeard, on 06/26/2008, -17/+20McCain's way past his "Best By" date.
- masterm1nd, on 06/27/2008, -12/+3You must be past your "grammar" date.
- SugarCoatedSalt, on 06/27/2008, -3/+7You must be past your "witty comments" date.
- masterm1nd, on 06/27/2008, -7/+1Ouch, lol.
- dsmx, on 06/27/2008, -4/+2I'm still trying to work out far far back McCain's "best by" date was.
- SugarCoatedSalt, on 06/27/2008, -3/+7You must be past your "witty comments" date.
- ramiro, on 06/27/2008, -2/+3Huffington Post is not only way past its "Best By" date but in fact has been detected with Escherichia coli.
BURIED
- masterm1nd, on 06/27/2008, -12/+3You must be past your "grammar" date.
- jackieblu, on 06/26/2008, -13/+7Is anyone really suprised...He's a wanna be, never was, and has been, all in one lame old dude!
- csw1342, on 06/27/2008, -1/+2Thanks Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Ted
- csw1342, on 06/27/2008, -1/+2Thanks Bill S. Preston, Esq.
- 911ArtStudent, on 06/27/2008, -21/+27They're trying to get as strong a commitment to Israel's interests as they can out of both Obama and McCain. But in the end no matter how much Obama tries to one up McCain, they know McCain will probably be more loyal to Israel.
I think they may be trying to get Lieberman to be McCain's running mate. It's already beginning to appear as if mcCain's mental faculties are eroding, which would make Lieberman the real power in the White House if McCai n should win.- USNavyBlue, on 06/27/2008, -10/+10I shutter at the thought! However, you have a major point.
As always God help us! Prepare yourself and keep your powder dry because we are really going to NEED IT!- mmmmmbiscuits, on 06/27/2008, -3/+10"I shutter at the thought!"
You close your window blinds? You take a photograph? - TheHomeOffice, on 08/08/2008, -10/+5So you are going to bash McCain and you were in the Navy?
What was your Rating and when did you serve? For a veteran to make vile accusations about a highly decorated, honorable, combat POW. It would not surprise me if you were some kind of low ASVAB striker who ended up being a YN, PN,AZ,or MS who ended up getting a OTH because of repeated Captains Masts.
It is amazing that you as a veteran is going to think that McCain who is a disabled POW who made a tremendous sacrifice would be more loyal to a foriegn nation than to the USA. Well you did agree with the troofer didn't you.
Partisanship aside what you are saying is just ignorant.
The amusing thing about you libs is that a year ago McCain was the "Maverick" in all of the media and that made a bit of a rift with the hard line conservatives. Now in your attempt to smear him every chance you can you guys falsely try to call him a neocon and now basically calling him a traitor. It won't work though. McCain is the closest one to center in this race. He is a lot closer than Superlib obama.- Drogoganor, on 06/27/2008, -6/+9Freedom of Speech, so ***** You, bottom feeder.
- csw1342, on 06/27/2008, -3/+6He is a traitor. Just like you.
- nycmac247, on 06/27/2008, -3/+3Colonel Kurtz, is that you?
- 911ArtStudent, on 06/27/2008, -3/+3Looks like Ih8troofers can't grasp the notion that all critics of McCain are not liberals. Nor is McCain a conservative.
- USNavyBlue, on 06/27/2008, -3/+1"When did I serve and my rank is officially" is none of your damn business. Smarty pants. Wake up John McCain is a RINO! And I don't support BO either.
Supports Global Taxes
Supports the Communist Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST)
Supports the communist United Nations
Bought and paid for by AIPAC
Supports Amnesty for approx 30-40 million illegal alien law breakers.
Supports NAFTA!
Supports the North American Union - the merger of the US, Mexico, and Canada into ONE NATION!
Approved federal funds for Planned Parenthood
Received a grade of (-F) from Gun Owners of America - he is a gun grabber in a half!
And the crappy part to all of this is BO supports the above too. There is very little difference between them!
Sought aid and comfort from the enemy while a POW.
http://www.vietnamveteransagainstjohnmccain.com/
You showed your ignorance by shooting off at the mouth and assuming I am a liberal among other things! - TheHomeOffice, on 08/08/2008, -2/+3Drogoganor reported for abuse to abuse@digg.com. Learn to act like you are over 8 years old
csw & nyc, ah and if you being civilians doing nothing but posting comments on Digg and playing playstation is somehow more helpful to the country than someones military or civil service than you must be borderline retarded son. So when uninformed androids like yourselves call people who have done more good than you ever have "traitors" all I can do is laugh. Lay off the bong kids.
As for you USNavyBlue, all one has to do is look into your background to see your ugly past which makes you irrelevant but I'll get to that in a second.
""When did I serve and my rank is officially" is none of your damn business." Well smarty pants (if that is the best you can do as a attempted insult it is truly ***** lame) see I am a Navy combat veteran and I have quite a lot of veteran friends from all branches. I even have some veteran friends here on Digg. When one of them are asked, and if anyone asks me about my service we do not clam up like a coward like you. So something is fishy about your lame answer. Chances are you have no idea what a Rate is, so you are a liar about serving in the Navy. So instead of having pride in your service you instead act like a ***** child and refuse to talk about it. The only and I mean ONLY other option is that you might have been in the Navy but were a striker and when you finally got to pick a rate all the chiefs would let you pick was a MS (if you even made it that long to pick up third before you got kicked out) See I know your kind from your piss poor attitude.
So we have established that you were either never in or got kicked out with a OTH (other than honorable discharge) and that explains why you are a disrespectful little pissant when it comes to a Naval war hero.
Your little link "Sought aid and comfort from the enemy while a POW.
http://www.vietnamveteransagainstjohnmccain.com/" which is utter BS and a total lie BTW is nothing more than a leftie soros funded smear site that attempts to demean and belittle POWS. Shame on you for that, SHAME on you.
So you think you got me because you are not a liberal? WRONG! You are just a rarer breed here on Digg and you just happen to be a bit more disgusting than the typical liberal. I dug through your account to check who you are and you are a disgusting person. Lets see shall we?
1.Well you are a hardcore, intolerant religious nut. Your kind and your vile views just make me glad that I am logical enough to be a atheist and let people like you wallow in your hate.
2. Of course like clockwork you are a rabid antisemite. It seems like that goes hand in hand with you people who hate the US Government. Here is one of your comments
"For more honest true information on the subject matter please visit Truth Tellers." (a racist hate site)
"And ISRAEL: WHOREHOUSE OF THE MIDDLE EAST" ( links to hate site again. You really seem to be obsessed with sex too. How come? Can't get any pussy there pal? Well a suggestion is that chicks do not like racist hate obsessed freaks like you. )
"Please learn the truth at hand - really this is a threat (the Jews of course) to everyone on the planet that is a gentile."
3. Openly intolerant of homosexuals.How 18th century of you.
4. Lies about atheists when it comes to talking about Christians using the lame old "you can only get your morals from the church" routine
5 defends Islamists and makes excuses for the jihadists but is instantly on to bash the "joooooos" for any real or imaginary transgression
So that about sums you up blue. You are a disgusting racist troll. Your so called points about McCain are a total joke and not even worth addressing. It is VERY doubtful that you ever served in the Navy (if you did then prove me wrong you racist POS and tell me what the proper name for the barracks is called in boot camp) So you bash the government yet try to leech off of it with your screen name trying to tell everyone you did something with your life which you obviously have not. No you were too busy buying into neo nazi conspiracy theories.
So here is how it will work. You are on notice. Your hate and anti semitism will no longer be tolerated here on digg. I will be monitoring your comments and your profile and turn you into abuse@digg.com when you violate the TOS. So I suggest that you go read the TOS because when you get banned you will only have yourself to blame.
In the end it turns out that you are much uglier than a liberal. - TheHomeOffice, on 08/08/2008, -2/+3911ArtStudent and you can't grasp that alex jones is a fraud, and that 911 was NOT a inside job.
A art student is just someone who still wants to get a college degree but is not smart enough to get a degree in the sciences. So in turn is willing to get brainwashed by America hating liberals and selling their souls.
No wonder you fall for conspiracy theories.
- mmmmmbiscuits, on 06/27/2008, -3/+10"I shutter at the thought!"
- flogistan, on 06/27/2008, -9/+7I swear, not even McCain could be that insane, but I've been seeing stranger things happen lately. At the very least, one of them will choose bloomberg. If McCain chooses Lieberman, I wash my hands of what was once my country.
- sanman, on 06/27/2008, -6/+11Haha, I love how this criticism of extra-territorialism gives Europe a free ride, while only singling out Israel. Look at NATO -- the ultimate in porkbarrel corporate welfare spending.
You wanna shut down the extra-territorialist lobbies, then how about starting with the ones that drain the most money, even as they maneuver to undermine America's position to abet the rise of their own new superpower.- 911ArtStudent, on 06/27/2008, -9/+5NATO isn't pushing us into a war with Iran; Israel is. Epic fail sanman.
- Drogoganor, on 06/27/2008, -4/+3"extra-territorialist lobbies" Yeah NATO lobbies for war all the time.
- sanman, on 06/27/2008, -0/+6Uh, hullo? McFly? Remember the aerial bombing of Belgrade, AFTER the Dayton Peace Accords had been signed? I guess you don't remember how General Wesley Farce almost started WW3 with the Russians over Pristina airport. Look at the relentless drive for expansionism by that organization. Now they're trying to bring in Georgia, which has a military dispute with Russia.
Nah, no potential for war there!
Gee, what could go wrong?
/sarc
- sanman, on 06/27/2008, -0/+6Uh, hullo? McFly? Remember the aerial bombing of Belgrade, AFTER the Dayton Peace Accords had been signed? I guess you don't remember how General Wesley Farce almost started WW3 with the Russians over Pristina airport. Look at the relentless drive for expansionism by that organization. Now they're trying to bring in Georgia, which has a military dispute with Russia.
- ElAssoWipo, on 06/27/2008, -9/+6Have you heard Obama's AIPAC speech?
Here's the short version:
"I'm bent over now, please put your penis in my butthole"
Here's the long version: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0cOJNC2EuJw - nycmac247, on 06/27/2008, -6/+2Why Obama Is A Sure Loser
And A Prelude To The McCain-Lieberman Disaster
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?nof ...- rald84, on 06/27/2008, -1/+1who the hell is "J"
- USNavyBlue, on 06/27/2008, -10/+10I shutter at the thought! However, you have a major point.
- Conspiracy20, on 06/27/2008, -9/+30I believe you're right with the VP position. Then he doesn't have to be "voted" in. Does anyone understand that we live in the USA and not Israel. This is a special interest group and not the majority. US first and foremost not ANY other foreign nation's interests.
- EWChomp, on 06/27/2008, -1/+1You hit the nail on its head. If I could digg your comment more than once I would.
- stfucupcake, on 06/27/2008, -6/+22I'd rather see the Democrats wake up and finally take a firm anti-war stance.
- TheHomeOffice, on 08/08/2008, -13/+3And what would you do with the Islamists that have declared Jihad since the 1980's?
- HumanCattle, on 06/27/2008, -5/+19The mujihadeen were our friends in the 80's. The CIA trained and supplied them with weapons to fight a proxy war against Russia in Afghanistan.
Bush gave 43 million dollars to the Taliban in May 2001. Then something happened, I can't remember exactly...
Anyway, whatever it was, now all muslims are bad and want to kill us and spread their caliphates all over the place :( - flashback99, on 06/27/2008, -1/+5home schooling sucks
- HumanCattle, on 06/27/2008, -5/+19The mujihadeen were our friends in the 80's. The CIA trained and supplied them with weapons to fight a proxy war against Russia in Afghanistan.
- toytoyota, on 06/27/2008, -6/+2An anti-war stance forever? Why? Just because this war sucks doesn't mean they should be ideologically opposed to wars. Instead, they should be the party that doesn't go to war unless authorized by Congress. Something that hasn't been done since.. what, WWII?
- sodade, on 06/27/2008, -1/+1After 60 years of a foreign policy that has only ***** the American people over, I think it is time for a constitutional amendment that every single adult of voting age should get an equally counted vote on whether to go to war or not.
In other words, protect America, not our international corporate interests.
- sodade, on 06/27/2008, -1/+1After 60 years of a foreign policy that has only ***** the American people over, I think it is time for a constitutional amendment that every single adult of voting age should get an equally counted vote on whether to go to war or not.
- TheHomeOffice, on 08/08/2008, -13/+3And what would you do with the Islamists that have declared Jihad since the 1980's?
- 911ArtStudent, on 06/27/2008, -12/+12Kudos to the Huffington Post for going with that title. Most editors would never state it so plainly.
- leahcim, on 06/27/2008, -14/+11Makes it sound like these Dems want us to bomb Iran as much as the neo cons. Man I'm about tired of Israel and its influence on our government.
- samard2002, on 06/27/2008, -6/+10Republicans making hypocritical exceptions for big business and Jewish representatives calling them out on it simply because they want more pressure on Iran. Not one mention of the average American citizen or worker, just two groups of special interest pawns trying to serve their masters.
Not a lot to like in that article. - Stryder81, on 06/27/2008, -9/+7http://normanfinkelstein.com/img/photos/latuff/whi ...
http://www.thecivicplatform.com/wp-content/uploads ... - jmhyer51, on 06/27/2008, -13/+3You might say they "crucified" him...
- tikited, on 06/27/2008, -8/+2He will be drunk and dead in office, losing his mind. Shortest presidency of all time.
- bxblox, on 06/27/2008, -3/+16Not that I support McCain in any way but "Congress' most prominent Jewish members" are nearly all democrats. How is this article any different than "Democrats attack Republican nominee on everything."
- nwoantibody, on 06/27/2008, -3/+2Difference is that you don't understand that Jew = instant citizen of Israel, and thus you have Israeli citizens criticizing a president aspirant on not being pro-Israeli enough.
- Mesmorize, on 06/27/2008, -1/+2No, you have American Citizens doing it.
I can't tell if you're a Muslim or a redneck but both are just as bad. - toowired77, on 06/27/2008, -1/+0The Dual loyalty accusation is getting old. How many Irish Americans supported the IRA through the 80s. America is a nation of immigrants who are all somewhat attached to their homeland. Should Italian Americans not care about Italy? The Israel lobby is really good at what they do. Blame them for that, but end the hypocrisy.
- Mesmorize, on 06/27/2008, -1/+2No, you have American Citizens doing it.
- nwoantibody, on 06/27/2008, -3/+2Difference is that you don't understand that Jew = instant citizen of Israel, and thus you have Israeli citizens criticizing a president aspirant on not being pro-Israeli enough.
- dimitrisokolov, on 06/27/2008, -15/+4
The Jews are taking the typical Jewish position. What else is new? - thebza451, on 06/27/2008, -17/+11how does a team of jews play football?
they try to get the quarter-back- V3NOM, on 06/27/2008, -3/+3Come on... too easy.
- BlacklabelSAR, on 06/27/2008, -3/+1Bigoted jokes take away from the case that Politically, we should not be propping up Israel. But with jokes like yours, people get to call racism.
- Mesmorize, on 06/27/2008, -0/+1Translated: "All the people supporting this are anti-Semites but don't make jokes or they get to actually call us on it."
- BlacklabelSAR, on 06/27/2008, -0/+1@ Mesmorize, that depends on how you define anti-semitism.
The defintions I am finding talk about hating and prejudice against jews, just like people that don't like Blacks, Mexicans, etc. But not about disagreement with Israel's politics. You seem to be saying that unless one supports Israel's politics and/or influence in the U.S. Government, etc, then one is anti-semitic.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-semitism
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/anti-Sem ...
I may see China as a threat, but that has nothing to do with how I feel about Chinese people.
- snassiri, on 06/27/2008, -5/+13So you Diggheads are always posting anti-McCain stuff, calling him McWar, and what not, and now you post an article saying he isn't tough enough?
(note voting for him btw, just pointing out the two-faceness)- blackhappy, on 06/27/2008, -8/+3Plus they are always yelling about there is to much Zionist influence on American politics and now they want to side with Jewish Congressman? Wish liberals would get on board with one another and figure out what they want.
- haffe, on 06/27/2008, -1/+10As you are surely aware. There is a difference between being jewish, being a militant zionist and being an Israeli. These states of being are not equivalent.
- snassiri, on 06/27/2008, -0/+2Don't give them the dignity of being called liberal. Modern "liberalism" is a sham, and a disgrace to true liberalism that this country was founded on, the true liberalism that most every American can agree to live by.
- blackhappy, on 06/27/2008, -0/+1@haffle, since I don't give a rats about any of the three I did not know the difference but thanks for the clarification. So which one is it that the candidates have to pander? Im guessing all three!
- CressCrowbits, on 06/27/2008, -0/+1More a case of posting an article saying he is a hypocrite.
- blackhappy, on 06/27/2008, -8/+3Plus they are always yelling about there is to much Zionist influence on American politics and now they want to side with Jewish Congressman? Wish liberals would get on board with one another and figure out what they want.
- heynow21, on 06/27/2008, -8/+8OK so which party do I join if I'd don't want America to be Israel's attack dog?
- neko6, on 06/27/2008, -6/+5Last time I checked, Israel does what the US says, not the other way around... Factually, the US never did anything that Israel wanted. They don't even tend to vote for Israel in the casual Arab-block condemnations in the UN Councils.
- Gutterpunk, on 06/27/2008, -2/+2You sir are profoundly disillusioned
- babak147, on 06/27/2008, -1/+1You didnt check well , Check again
- neko6, on 06/27/2008, -6/+5Last time I checked, Israel does what the US says, not the other way around... Factually, the US never did anything that Israel wanted. They don't even tend to vote for Israel in the casual Arab-block condemnations in the UN Councils.
- dmature, on 06/27/2008, -1/+0It's very dangerous.
- Jenadae, on 06/27/2008, -2/+4I've always wondered how you became a "prominent" dem. Does this somehow come with being a millionaire or job position? Does that somehow make you more correct with your ideas then other Dems? Or is it just a shouting contest and loudest one wins...
- TheImaginator, on 06/27/2008, -1/+2I have a theory that rich politicians are more prominent than poorer politicians, I think that the political parties treat them nicely and fawn over them in order to get campaign funds.
- WikiEasy, on 06/27/2008, -6/+15So now we have non-stop anti-McCain SPAM. Great.. This damn site is just as biased as Fox.
- medfreak, on 06/27/2008, -5/+5In before the typical retarded comment: "Buried for Huffington post."
- SugarCoatedSalt, on 06/27/2008, -8/+3***** MCCAIN!!!
- TheImaginator, on 06/27/2008, -8/+2Hah - this could work out nicely.
Jews want McFunt to be heavily against Iran etc and so they vote against him when he votes for Haliburton and follows the money instead.
McFunt gets less votes.
We all win.- mal1964, on 06/27/2008, -1/+1OK!
- mal1964, on 06/27/2008, -4/+2So ***** what
- Wartyboskfapped, on 06/27/2008, -0/+3so he's going to lose.
- mal1964, on 06/27/2008, -0/+1Not because another Negative story about him is on digg
- Wartyboskfapped, on 06/27/2008, -0/+3so he's going to lose.
- Wartyboskfapped, on 06/27/2008, -4/+5McCain will never be President. You know it. I know it. Probably he knows it, too.
- pitlord, on 06/28/2008, -1/+1If you were really so sure, you wouldn't need to read articles like this one to convince you.
>.>
- pitlord, on 06/28/2008, -1/+1If you were really so sure, you wouldn't need to read articles like this one to convince you.
- Tyrghast, on 06/27/2008, -7/+4Just the kind low-quality of 'who cares' story from huffingtonpost.com
Jews, blacks, whites, polka-dotted, it is not good for anyone to vote for mccain. - edagan, on 06/27/2008, -3/+1By the time of the next presidency, Israel will have bombed Iran anyway - see:
http://www.thatdanny.com/2008/06/08/why-israel-wil ... - blackhappy, on 06/27/2008, -3/+8I was almost drawn into this article and then I realized in was a huff and puff post, dugg down!
- rexblade, on 06/27/2008, -1/+2This still needs to be fixed http://brasschecktv.com/page/327.html
- JointVenture, on 06/27/2008, -5/+9What a second, I thought AIPAC was behind our planned attack of Iran next month?
Looks like AIPAC is made up of Democrats.
. - CorneliusStump, on 06/27/2008, -8/+7yes my aipac masters, anything you say. the US will fight the entire middle east for israel. money please.
- neko6, on 06/27/2008, -9/+5Ahhhh paranoia! The irrational and unsubstantiated fear from the evil Jooz who control the country, take all the money, and lead the majority race into oblivion.
Just the stuff holocausts are made of.
P.S: Can you show a war that the US was involved in that Israeli officials supported? Last time I checked, every time the US was involved in a war, Israel either suffered from it or was totally oblivious.- RationalXubrnce, on 06/27/2008, -1/+4 Who cares what Israeli leaders say. If Jewish money and Jewish media power back a war it's very convenient for the leadership of Israel to say whatever they want.
- ItStillMoves, on 06/27/2008, -1/+3The cold war, the gulf war, the invasion of afghanistan, the invasion of iraq, the war on terror...Oh, btw...It's 2008.
Just kidding, you're right: AIPAC doesn't have any influence, they're not financed by Israel (which itself is not financed by the US). Nice dreams... - nycmac247, on 06/27/2008, -1/+4holocausts holocausts holocausts holocausts holocausts holocausts
just keep repeating WWII comparisons and we'll all believe everything you say no matter how crazy - soinie, on 06/27/2008, -1/+2If those prominent Jewish Democrats are so ***** worried about Israel they should leave office, register as agents of a foreign government, give up their US citizenship, move to Israel and become part of the Knesset. We can certainly do without a few AIPAC whores who think Israel's interests come before those of American citizens.
- Mesmorize, on 06/27/2008, -2/+1Quite frankly, I'm just wondering when they'll start saying the Jewish Cabal(in so called form of AIPAC) bakes their matzah with the blood of children to supply the IDF's rations.
- neko6, on 06/27/2008, -9/+5Ahhhh paranoia! The irrational and unsubstantiated fear from the evil Jooz who control the country, take all the money, and lead the majority race into oblivion.
- neko6, on 06/27/2008, -0/+5Apart of the not-very-rational (yet understandable) fear of a Muslim American president, the Jewish world (including Israel) seems not to care too much whether Obama or McCain take office.
- toowired77, on 06/27/2008, -0/+0Should Christians and Muslims be afraid of a Jewish American President or Vice-President? If Jews are afraid of a Muslim president, why are there Jews living in Muslim countries to this day? Bigotry is wrong. Not all Muslims are extremists.
- Ne007, on 06/27/2008, -2/+4***** McCain. I know he is a neocon 100%
- flink405, on 06/27/2008, -4/+6Ever notice how Obama sounds more and more like a Republican?
When he was going against Hillary he was the left-of-Hillary liberal.
Now he has abandoned nearly everything he stood for to win the primaries and is sounding more like a Republican every day.
He is for FISA (against it before).
He is now for gun ownership (against it before).
He is against public financing (was for it before).
He is for the free-trade NAFTA agreements (before he was against it).
Soon we will hear Obama saying how the troops have stay in Iraq to finish the job.
Snookered. Hoodwinked.- BlacklabelSAR, on 06/27/2008, -0/+1Which is why we ALL need to stop playing the "my team vs your team" childish game, and hold ALL our public servants accountable.
"My candidate/President/country right or wrong" is emotionally immature. But then that's how fearful, dumbed down people tend to act. - toowired77, on 06/27/2008, -0/+0If Obama lacked the ability to compromise or if his thinking was not so practical, you would criticize him for that? Can't please them all. Go Obama!
- BlacklabelSAR, on 06/27/2008, -0/+1Which is why we ALL need to stop playing the "my team vs your team" childish game, and hold ALL our public servants accountable.
- AsylumAleikum, on 06/27/2008, -9/+5John McCain is a war hero. Barack Hussein "Don't call me Muslim" Obama is an Ahmadinejad's bitch.
Guess which of the two would be tougher on Iran.- Gutterpunk, on 06/27/2008, -0/+2Your mom?
- toddc612, on 06/27/2008, -0/+1He's a war hero? So ***** what. It doesn't mean he's capable of running this country.
As far as the Muslim comment.. well, you just showed us what red state gutter you rolled out from this morning. - toowired77, on 06/27/2008, -0/+1Wow. We need to find out how the republicans are so effective at drawing retarded voters. The Obama Muslim thing is getting old. Come up with some other irrational excuse to hate the man. Of course if God gave you half a brain you might be able to. But since he didn't, we understand.
- amightywind, on 06/27/2008, -7/+5There are lots of self-loathing Jews on the American left who would offer their throats to a muslim if asked. Happily Israeli Jews are made of sterner stuff.
- toowired77, on 06/28/2008, -0/+1"self-loathing Jews " - Is this your equivalent of Uncle Tom? I guess anyone that disagrees with hard right tactics has to be self hating.
- chaserm, on 06/27/2008, -0/+2http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/israel/freedman ...
- ItStillMoves, on 06/27/2008, -1/+5Stop living in the left-right paradigm: both sides are owned by the same interests. My god, both Obama and McCain even attend the same lobby groups (AIPAC etc.)...
So grow up instead of cheering for your favorite footbal captain like a hormone-overdosed teenage cheerleader. - RationalXubrnce, on 06/27/2008, -1/+3 By the title I thought this was going to be an article about how Jews in Congress don't agree with McCains hard line stance on Iran and wanted to make that point known. I guess I should have known better.
- Dan11023, on 06/27/2008, -5/+2As a Persian-Jew whos parents grew up in Iran i gotta say................... McCain FTW!!! allllll they way.
"...Dems Attack McCain's....."....... well no *****.
Buried as LAME! - Opiate, on 06/27/2008, -2/+2For a war vet to even contemplate supporting israel after what they did to the U.S.S. Liberty, McCain indeed the hypocrite. If they are capable of that, you only know what their thinking is in regards to Iran. U.S. fodder to the "master" race.
- Mesmorize, on 06/27/2008, -1/+1You're disgusting.
- WTFppl, on 06/27/2008, -1/+2Any vote that is not for Dr. Paul, is a vote for failure!
- DharmaDog, on 06/27/2008, -0/+3OK, Im confused. Was this article attacking Jews, McCain or Halliburton? Or was it a three-for-one?
- BlacklabelSAR, on 06/27/2008, -2/+1Maybe we need to pressure an Israel/Iran non-aggression pact. But then neither side would be buying from our Military Complex would they? And that is what is really going on, isn't it?
- babak147, on 06/27/2008, -0/+2None buy anything from our complex anyway, Iran is sanctioned and Israel gets it for free.
- 55mph, on 06/27/2008, -3/+2psychopaths!!
Ron Paul is the only sensible alternative to the insanity. - FLUX, on 06/27/2008, -1/+4its huffington post auto digg down
I would like just one day with out having to see the worthless lies and partisan ***** from this lieing worthless trash rag on the front page
don't her employees get a day off from having to digg every piece of propaganda she puts out - sultanica, on 06/27/2008, -1/+3here's an idea, why don't the Israelies deal with their own problems and stop trying to get the US involved? While we're on the topic, why don't they stop taking the WW2 compensation money the US gives them every year since WW2?
- TedLW30101, on 06/27/2008, -1/+1Obviously, McCain has the wrong stance entirely.
Obama's stance that Iran is a tiny country and not a significant threat is the better way to go.
In fact..... wait, what's that? Oh, I'm just told by my Democratic leaders that Iran is a threat. Sorry, Obama is still learning about recent world history. - crackberri, on 06/27/2008, -0/+0Breaking News! Jews against Republicans! I bet they will change their mind when Barack gives away Israel to the Palestinians.
-
Show 51 - 55 of 55 discussions

Digg is coming to a city (and computer) near you! Check out all the details on our