Wow, Amazon who doesn't even have a foundation model helped ban Anthropic because of "security" concerns
The right answer is to use these models to prevent vulnerabilities and security threats
Not ban them, so China can make even more powerful models and take their systems down 🤯🤯
Positive users hope the Anthropic ban will be quickly reversed or see it as useful branding, while negative users call it foolish for aiding China, enabling tyranny, or accuse Amazon of deliberately devaluing the company.
Ok this gets even weirder
White House confirms OpenAI, Grok or Google won’t be banned
Only Anthropic!
They just need to fix this so called jail break and be done with it
@bindureddy Security is the eternal recourse of state bureacracy to impose tyranny at home and abroad.
What confuses me is that all of these models can be jailbroken. Arguably, many of them are easier to jailbreak than Fable.
Yes, Fable was more capable, but it didn't seem that much more capable than GPT-5.5.
When GPT-5.6 comes out, people will almost certainly find ways to jailbreak it too.
At some point, it seems like this is a fundamental property of LLMs. They're language-based systems, and language is inherently flexible.
If a model can understand complex instructions and reason through problems,
then people will always be looking for new ways to phrase requests, bypass restrictions, or trick the model into doing things it wasn't supposed to do.
so why the beef with Anthropic
@bindureddy Amazon holds 15-20 percent of Ant. Something is going on .
@aykutuz Well their stock is doing badly compared to other big tech..
15% is not 100%
@bindureddy You are not getting it, Amazon deliberately helped ban the model so that the market reduces the valuation of Anthropic and Amazon can get more position for less. Absolute brilliant tactic.
@esseremercedes You do realize having a 15% position means nothing
Anthropic is going to surpass Amazon’s entire market cap in 6 months 🤷♀️
@aykutuz The US government is going to listen to like 2 companies, at most, not tens of thousands
@bindureddy What I am saying is this, this is not normal. There were tens of companies who would initiate that.
Why the biggest shareholder?
@bindureddy And it was all too obvious where they were pushing things towards:
@bindureddy Ok; all is normal then :)
( i said tens of companies you misread i think; not tens of thousands of companies. The number of companies that could have done is definitely more than 2. Many of glasswing participant had that profile and ties)
@Weird_Canadian @bindureddy No. They tried to manipulate the system to bring in AI regulations that would serve them in long term.
@Weird_Canadian @bindureddy Govt is playing their game; bringing regulations “for them”.
@bindureddy America banned its best AI for security. China said — "thank you for the head start."
Either Anthopic has a CEO problem or a technology problem The CEO runs around claiming their models are more dangerous than nukes, the DoD cant use them -- and Anthropic board does nothing to counter these claims btw. Either anthropic is out of control allowing anybody access to such power, or the CEO has lost the plot and isn't fit. TLDR; starting a confrontation with the US military and selling from the US to the globe and claiming nuke equivalent powers is playing stupid games, and now winning stupid prizes
@bindureddy Boycott amazon e commerce
@DanielGPT2022 100%
@bindureddy Because @AnthropicAI refused to use Claude as a weapon
@bindureddy you don't ban the thing that finds the holes
china will just use this to ship unpatched systems
@bindureddy just rename fable as opus 4.9 and bypass the ban already...