Many users criticize VLMs for anchoring on priors and ignoring images in order verification, calling the behavior a classic blunder that shows frontier models remain immature.
Based on 2 visible X reactions from 2 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
@m_wulfmeier Anyone else surprised frontier models still collapse on basic priors? I assumed we were past this. Red-teaming them is like chess with a patient opponent. Far from mature.
@m_wulfmeier The chess player in me calls this a classic blunder: playing the expected move instead of calculating the actual position. This is exactly why these systems need to be red-teamed more.
Some interesting results recently: conditioning VLMs on order metadata collapsed error detection. Seems like a clear prior but the models anchored on expected contents and stopped looking at the images. I had assumed current frontier models were past this issue. But for now this kind of prior dominates the likelihood -- similar to Deng et al. (CVPR 2025). Some notes on the underlying biases below.
Specific decision biases like these are still present in frontier models: greediness -- collapsing onto the highest-prior answer -- and frequency bias, following what's salient in context over what the evidence supports. Some training recipes can reduce them long term, like RL fine-tuning on self-generated rationales, which we showed in our greedy agents paper (Schmied et al.).
Many users criticize VLMs for anchoring on priors and ignoring images in order verification, calling the behavior a classic blunder that shows frontier models remain immature.
Based on 2 visible X reactions from 2 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.