Why I think Anthropic's uneven safety policies with the release of Claude Fable 5 undermine the broader AI community's cohesion and accelerate us to more uncertainty and risk in AI's near-term evolution. https://www.interconnects.ai/p/claude-fable-5-and-new-ai-safety
(i've been pretty sick the last few days so if something is off plz be charitable in the rapid speed blog assembly line)
Why I think Anthropic's uneven safety policies with the release of Claude Fable 5 undermine the broader AI community's cohesion and accelerate us to more uncertainty and risk in AI's near-term evolution. https://www.interconnects.ai/p/claude-fable-5-and-new-ai-safety
I understand generic griping, but you are complaining about a company that has consistently been against open source, consistently had very restrictive terms of service, and consistently argued against diffusion of the cutting edge technology. You can dislike it all you want, but this is par for the course from Anthropic since the earliest days.
@w_bsun Mostly I've given them a pass because it was mostly being annoying before and not taking action.
@natolambert Fable agrees:
@natolambert the tension between moving fast and holding the line was always going to crack something eventually
@natolambert the irony is that every major lab ships safety comms that read like they were written for a different product than the one in the release notes. fable 5 isn't unique in that gap, it's just the most visible example right now
Why I think Anthropic's uneven safety policies with the release of Claude Fable 5 undermine the broader AI community's cohesion and accelerate us to more uncertainty and risk in AI's near-term evolution. https://www.interconnects.ai/p/claude-fable-5-and-new-ai-safety