Happy to say I was quite wrong
I predict 48 for GLM 5.2
AI commentator Teortaxes publicly conceded an overly optimistic forecast after GLM-5 posted a 40 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, missing the 48 he had projected for the GLM 5.2 variant.
Happy to say I was quite wrong
I predict 48 for GLM 5.2
GLM-5.2 has since reached 51 on the same index, shifting attention from the earlier shortfall to steady gains in the GLM series for open-weights agentic work.
Public calls on new model scores continue to overshoot or undershoot live benchmark updates, leaving room for revised expectations as Zhipu iterates.
Some users felt happy for techshrek after the analyst admitted overestimating GLM-5 scores, while others criticized xAI's massive hardware scale and the model's failure at basic text art output.
No Digg Deeper questions have been answered for this story yet.
@teortaxesTex I am so happy for techshrek
Happy to say I was quite wrong

@teortaxesTex closest guess

@teortaxesTex I expect you to make a good Zigger joke about this.

@teortaxesTex Failed my text art test as it can't even output any text art.

@teortaxesTex Wtf is wrong with http://X.ai ? More than 100,000 GB200 equivalent cards!

@teortaxesTex I wish they had also reported for "High" not just "Max", that might have edged it closer to the green quadrant.

@STUD_MAN_X not as close as this guy

@teortaxesTex quando eu vi, pensei nos seus 48 na hora kkkk

@turchin @teortaxesTex Maybe that's the kind of task for a VLM will do better.