Florian Brand countered by citing safety gaps in Grok
@xeophon The answer to your question is CSAM generation, by the way. CSAM is an unambiguous win for closed source being safer. It’s the only example I know.
I have notes on why the WormGPT stuff was a total fraud, if that’s helpful to include too.
yeah, looking further into this and it seems like open models are safer. blog about this later
Some users agree with the claim that open source AI enables CSAM generation while closed models prevent it, while others sarcastically dismiss the argument as stretching the meaning of 'safe'.
@BlancheMinerva The counter-example is Grok
@xeophon The answer to your question is CSAM generation, by the way. CSAM is an unambiguous win for closed source being safer. It’s the only example I know.
I have notes on why the WormGPT stuff was a total fraud, if that’s helpful to include too.
@BlancheMinerva But I agree
@BlancheMinerva @xeophon Really, really stretching the meaning of "safe" with that one.
Florian Brand countered by citing safety gaps in Grok
@xeophon The answer to your question is CSAM generation, by the way. CSAM is an unambiguous win for closed source being safer. It’s the only example I know.
I have notes on why the WormGPT stuff was a total fraud, if that’s helpful to include too.
yeah, looking further into this and it seems like open models are safer. blog about this later