Tom's Hardware says the record-breaking ParaStor F9000 storage system lost the top spot because it doesn't meet reproducibility requirements.
A sanctioned Chinese supercomputer maker has been stripped of the IO500 benchmark crown because its ParaStor F9000 storage system doesn't meet reproducibility requirements, Tom's Hardware reports. The publisher says Intel-powered Aurora has retaken the lead, while describing ParaStor F9000 as still among the world's fastest storage subsystems.
4.5K
1 post, first seen 2d ago
Tom's Hardware says the record-breaking ParaStor F9000 storage system lost the top spot because it doesn't meet reproducibility requirements.
A sanctioned Chinese supercomputer maker has been stripped of the IO500 benchmark crown because its ParaStor F9000 storage system doesn't meet reproducibility requirements, Tom's Hardware reports. The publisher says Intel-powered Aurora has retaken the lead, while describing ParaStor F9000 as still among the world's fastest storage subsystems.
Tom's Hardware@tomshardwareSanctioned Chinese supercomputer maker stripped of IO500 benchmark crown, Intel-powered Aurora retakes the lead — record-breaking ParaStor F9000 storage system doesn't meet reproducibility requirements
Tom's Hardware@tomshardwareSanctioned Chinese supercomputer maker stripped of IO500 benchmark crown, Intel-powered Aurora retakes the lead — record-breaking ParaStor F9000 storage system doesn't meet reproducibility requirements
Not enough discussion yet.
No sentiment analysis available yet.
Not enough discussion yet.
No sentiment analysis available yet.
—
Not ranked yet
—
Not ranked yet