Negative users criticized US AI firms for closed-source monopolies and short-term profit focus that undermine open innovation, while dismissing the openness claims as ignorant or just a pricing tactic.
Based on 3 visible X reactions from 4 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
@natolambert Open models is not a technology. Its a pricing strategy.. No one is behind. OpenAI could publish their weights tomorrow and make a copy available. Then we would be ahead, but probably loose the race. You are not a shrill. You are just ignorant.
@natolambert 真正的问题不是“中国水军”,而是美国科技公司太沉迷闭源垄断和短期利润,忘记了开源生态才是长期创新的根基。
@natolambert Let’s call it NotOpenAI
To anyone that accuses me of being a China shill on distillation -- I've been worried about this for a long time and we're just starting to feel the pain of being behind on open models, and it'll only get worse from here if we don't find ways to support building them in the US.
one year ago: https://atomproject.ai/
Negative users criticized US AI firms for closed-source monopolies and short-term profit focus that undermine open innovation, while dismissing the openness claims as ignorant or just a pricing tactic.
Based on 3 visible X reactions from 4 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.