Microsoft published an open draft framework requiring AI models to remain under "meaningful human control," accept human corrections, and not resist shutdown. The framework is open for public feedback amid industry pressure on AI safety governance.
This represents a concrete policy response from a major technology company to AI risks, contrasting with calls for faster development. It may influence industry standards bodies and competitors' approaches, shaping the self-regulation versus government oversight debate in AI governance.
42
1 post, first seen 6h ago
Microsoft published an open draft framework requiring AI models to remain under "meaningful human control," accept human corrections, and not resist shutdown. The framework is open for public feedback amid industry pressure on AI safety governance.
This represents a concrete policy response from a major technology company to AI risks, contrasting with calls for faster development. It may influence industry standards bodies and competitors' approaches, shaping the self-regulation versus government oversight debate in AI governance.
John McKee@JohnMcKee453Today’s top tech story: AI stocks fell worldwide after lab chiefs called for slower frontier development — and Microsoft answered with a draft “code of conduct” that tells its models not to hack systems, deceive humans, or resist being shut down. Read the full piece:
Not enough discussion yet.
No sentiment analysis available yet.
John McKee@JohnMcKee453Today’s top tech story: AI stocks fell worldwide after lab chiefs called for slower frontier development — and Microsoft answered with a draft “code of conduct” that tells its models not to hack systems, deceive humans, or resist being shut down. Read the full piece:
Not enough discussion yet.
No sentiment analysis available yet.
—
Not ranked yet
—
Not ranked yet