Many users dismissed VCs pushing government mandates for frontier labs to sell AI training rights as shocking, hypocritical, self-serving, or absurd.
Based on 11 visible X reactions from 20 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
@DeanMeyerrr Absolutely. Whether it is the USG forcing the labs to allow distillation legally, or what you are proposing...it feels like this is all coming to a head. Something will have to give. Crazy times indeed
@buccocapital Thx for sharing. Crazy times…
@buccocapital It is a shocking ask.
This is a fascinating, honestly kind of shocking post. Of course, lots of VCs are quote tweeting it. Look at what it says! - "American companies need a legal way to turn American frontier capability into cheaper, ownable models." - "Frontier labs could sell structured training rights to qualifying Western and allied companies" - "If a voluntary market does not develop, access could eventually become a condition attached to major federal AI contracts, for example." So...Frontier Labs should hand their capabilities to other American companies at low cost. If they won't, the government should force them. A transfer of value from the companies building the frontier to the companies who don't want to pay. Framed as a national security requirement. The VC drumbeat is getting louder. Very interesting times.
I am open to someone explaining how I am misinterpreting this post
Many users dismissed VCs pushing government mandates for frontier labs to sell AI training rights as shocking, hypocritical, self-serving, or absurd.
Based on 11 visible X reactions from 20 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.