Users criticized Fable for failing to get the screen ratio right in its stock comparison app and video.
Based on 1 visible X reactions from 3 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
@deedydas Fable didn’t even get the screen ratio right. Tf??
Overall, my notes: — Sol's first try took 8.5mins and only had demo stocks. Then it span for 8mins more but then needed an API key to get real data. Fable somehow figured out how to get real data. — Fable's filtering and feature set was more rich. It had gainers and losers, log scale, far more categories to filter by, countries, and top X. Sol had sectors, but fewers, and minimum return, a client search and bookmarks. Both had market cap filtering — UI is a matter of taste. I didn't have any custom instructions, but I personally slightly preferred Fable's UI. Both were pretty top-tier though. — Fable's stock ticker data and granularity was better. Sol used fewer data points and smoothed curves, which isn't exactly what I wanted.
I asked the new GPT 5.6 Sol Ultra vs Fable XHigh to "create an app to compare the fastest growing stocks in diff time periods" Here are the results. I then asked both to create a comparison video. Sol couldn't do it, so here's what Fable made. Check out how they compare! https://x.com/deedydas/status/2075797388598689934/video/1
Users criticized Fable for failing to get the screen ratio right in its stock comparison app and video.
Based on 1 visible X reactions from 3 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.