Many users praised GPT-5.6-Sol for major intelligence gains and solving complex tasks like programming and cyber work that earlier models could not handle, while a few called it token-hungry or dumber than Fable.
Based on 16 visible X reactions from 58 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
@TheZvi The best model not named Fable or Mythos It's genuinely better than Fable at narrative work Using them in tandem feels like AGI, and I'm not exaggerating 8/10 for 5.6 Sol. (it drains my limits)
@TheZvi Massive step up, for the first time I went from gpt plus to gpt pro while having my Claude max active.
@TheZvi made a very disappointing animation
@TheZvi It’s insanely good
@TheZvi The best model not named Fable or Mythos It's genuinely better than Fable at narrative work Using them in tandem feels like AGI, and I'm not exaggerating 8/10 for 5.6 Sol. (it drains my limits)
@TheZvi Massive step up, for the first time I went from gpt plus to gpt pro while having my Claude max active.
@TheZvi made a very disappointing animation
@TheZvi Dumber than Fable for me so far
@TheZvi it good
Okay, it's time. GPT-5.6-Sol reaction thread. Go.
@TheZvi Kind of crazy
Many users praised GPT-5.6-Sol for major intelligence gains and solving complex tasks like programming and cyber work that earlier models could not handle, while a few called it token-hungry or dumber than Fable.
Based on 16 visible X reactions from 58 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
@TheZvi it good
@TheZvi Kind of crazy