Users praise Thinking Machines' essay on a defense-in-depth plan to delay human obsolescence for its valuable input on innovation and policy plus its strong final sentence.
Based on 2 visible X reactions from 1 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
I think Thinky could make a very valuable contribution to technical innovation as well as policy debates on such things. No need to rely on a single thing (obsolescence delay generally or fine-tuning specifically).
OK gonna stop there... here's the essay, which also has a banger of a final sentence. https://thinkingmachines.ai/blog/the-future-worth-building-is-human/
I think of this as a defense-in-depth thing - delay obsolescence somewhat via augment-y stuff, make AIs value humans having a say, require some inefficient human sand in the gears of the economy, make AIs need your biometric/cryptographic vote on some stuff, and (etc.)
https://x.com/Miles_Brundage/status/2075829588501147790?s=20
Users praise Thinking Machines' essay on a defense-in-depth plan to delay human obsolescence for its valuable input on innovation and policy plus its strong final sentence.
Based on 2 visible X reactions from 1 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.