Users dismiss the claim that the economy is ultimately about what humans value as only partly true in debates over AI superintelligence alignment assumptions.
Based on 1 visible X reactions from 1 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
@boazbaraktcs @JaEsf Oh, and as a final point, "the economy is ultimately about what humans value" is only partly true - preference driven decision-making doesn't align with what people actively value, and the market certainly exploits people and creates outcomes no participant endorses!
I disagree several of the underlying assumptions, including the notion that an aligned ASI needs to be a "super-nanny for humanity" as well with the notion that just because systems are super intelligent then they deserve welfare or should be considered as a "race." (But my sense is that this may become a deeper back and forth discussion than X is designed for..)
@boazbaraktcs @JaEsf I agree that there are far better outcomes that having ASI as a super-nanny, I just don't see them as reachable without either ignoring/overriding most people's values to get there, or somehow solving ethics. I'd love to see coherent visions that are none of those. But I haven't.
@boazbaraktcs @JaEsf I also don't know that AI becomes sentient or a moral patient - but I don't think that is a resolvable empirical question. And yes, I agree we're unlikely to resolve any of this on X.
Users dismiss the claim that the economy is ultimately about what humans value as only partly true in debates over AI superintelligence alignment assumptions.
Based on 1 visible X reactions from 1 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.