Many users agreed with the Vercel CEO that the AGI term has aged poorly because AI excels at tasks without resembling general human intelligence or replacing human meaning, while others dread AI preempting personal tokens and actions.
Based on 15 visible X reactions from 68 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
On #1: Humans aren't great at ingesting our entire being as "context" either. Sometimes what I think is righteous anger is just me being hungry or sleep deprived. There's a gap between who we think we are, who others perceive us to be, and who we actually are. I don't think it's crazy that models eventually understand parts of us better than we understand ourselves.
@rauchg Couldn’t agree more. AI is best used as a tool to increase human flourishing. Not replace it.
@rauchg Agreed! While AI excels in many tasks, the human touch in creativity and empathy remains irreplaceable.
@rauchg I dread a world where AI produces my next token before I do.
@rauchg You’re absolutely right!
@rauchg yeah
The term "AGI" has aged very poorly. AI can't possibly me more different from human intelligence. It's *far better* than human intelligence, for most economically-relevant tasks. But that doesn't make AIs better than humanity. There are wonderful things humans can do that these superintelligences (the better term) can't. For one, we care-for and care-about other humans in a powerful and inherent way, that we then teach machines to emulate. We must keep that as the top priority in everything we do. We have to be as pro-human-life as it gets. AIs can replace tasks you do, but they can't replace the proverbial you. This is why they horribly suck at writing! Even when given a corpus of your writing and 200 Skills and 50 subagents running in gRaPh LoOps, they produce robotic prose… because they are robots. I know one definitive way that people can become irrelevant. They stop being themselves: lose their identity, delegate all their writing, their unique thoughts, the creative ways in which they can use the machines. Opting out of 'weighing in'. I think we're safe though. There's nothing more distasteful right now than AI replies in social media or (🟢 T H I S T H I N G ) in landing pages. Quality and humanity will prevail.
Many users agreed with the Vercel CEO that the AGI term has aged poorly because AI excels at tasks without resembling general human intelligence or replacing human meaning, while others dread AI preempting personal tokens and actions.
Based on 15 visible X reactions from 68 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.