/Tech8h ago

Synthetic Biologist Calls AI Bio Tool Restrictions Misguided

433535.4K
Original postAnshul Kundaje#1779

@InVitroFuture @p_maverick_b @baym These restrictions show the deciders have never set foot in a biolab. Even simple things often don't work, and engineering and *testing* a pathogen is very far from simple. It's not like vibe coding, guys.

7:58 AM 路 Jun 10, 2026 路 5.4K Views
Sentiment

Many users dismissed Anthropic's biosafety policy team as lacking practical understanding of AI bio tool restrictions and relying on metrics uncorrelated with reality.

Pos
0.0%
Neg
100.0%
3 comments with sentiment.
Cluster Engagement
Posts from X
Most Activity
Most Activity
VIEWS247

@TomKnightSynBio @p_maverick_b @baym If Anthropic's biosafety policy team doesn't have a good understanding of the practical steps necessary to develop harmful new forms of infectious material, all the more reason for them not to trust themselves to write rules to distinguish such work from innocuous bio research

7hViews 247Likes 1Bookmarks 1
BOOKMARKS1
Billy Lau@billytcl

@jvarga92 @TomKnightSynBio @InVitroFuture @p_maverick_b @baym They鈥檙e indexing on metrics that have little correlation to reality, and conveniently ignore that most of biology today is not measurable.

6hViews 33Likes 1Bookmarks 1
LIKES2
Dan Fulop@fulop_dan

@InVitroFuture @TomKnightSynBio @p_maverick_b @baym Then they should hire ppl that do know!

7hViews 29Likes 2
REPLIES1

@TomKnightSynBio @InVitroFuture @p_maverick_b @baym And what about all the tech bros announcing every day that they came up with the newest shiny super binder design pipelines, then show high iptm/whatever values only without any experimental testing? Like as if it was not shown to be not useful for measuring binding 100s of times

7hViews 216Likes 2Bookmarks 1