Users agree that AI research must become faster and more policy-relevant, calling the discussion an excellent start to something great.
Based on 2 visible X reactions from 6 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
Thanks for this excellent comment! Totally agree we need to figure out how to do research on AI that can be policy relevant and also ends up as something that matters for scholars ten years from now. We presented this at world Bank, imf, UN, and more and I always stress exactly the concerns you raised. Personally, I think achieving a system that can better inform policy will involve rewarding output that isn't a traditional paper, but would be fun to talk more about what this might look like. Perhaps there is a workshop that could serve this function? Basically once a quarter scholars get together and hack the best insights they can about AInin a week and results get shared as dashboards, websites and more. Everyone does a light peer review of the output to ensure quality at the end? I am sure there hundreds of other fun ways we could contribute, though hard part is the incentivea for Juniors to do this.
@orgRem @otis_reid This could be start of something great!:)
The delay leaves junior economists struggling to publish timely technological research.
Thanks for this excellent comment! Totally agree we need to figure out how to do research on AI that can be policy relevant and also ends up as something that matters for scholars ten years from now. We presented this at world Bank, imf, UN, and more and I always stress exactly the concerns you raised. Personally, I think achieving a system that can better inform policy will involve rewarding output that isn't a traditional paper, but would be fun to talk more about what this might look like. Perhaps there is a workshop that could serve this function? Basically once a quarter scholars get together and hack the best insights they can about AInin a week and results get shared as dashboards, websites and more. Everyone does a light peer review of the output to ensure quality at the end? I am sure there hundreds of other fun ways we could contribute, though hard part is the incentivea for Juniors to do this.
Users agree that AI research must become faster and more policy-relevant, calling the discussion an excellent start to something great.
Based on 2 visible X reactions from 6 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.