Belfield says the standards inherit evaluations from existing safety frameworks
@gleech Surprised by you saying this.
Frontier Safety Standards would build on FSF, RSP, Preparedness etc which all evaluate for misalignment. FARO would handle all the categories in the FSF
Like are you saying misalignment science is too nascent for standards and audits? I'm confused
@HaydnBelfield seems FARO won't handle one of your Frontier Safety Framework's main three categories. Who will?
No Digg Deeper questions have been answered for this story yet.
@gleech "safety" and "security" are mentioned like 20-25 times
Agree this doc is more about the governance & doesn't get into the detail of what's in the FSF - but FARO would cover the same categories as the FSF
@HaydnBelfield My point was buried in the bottom of the attached images: I don't see any mention of misalignment or loss of control in this
@HaydnBelfield My point was buried in the bottom of the attached images: I don't see any mention of misalignment or loss of control in this