I can't ask Fable this question at all. damn.
Vitaliy Chiley calls engineering job security a key 2025 theme.
I can't ask Fable this question at all. damn.
Some users accuse the researcher questioning Codex 5.5's bug-finding ability with extra compute of knowing the answer and being scared of it.
> job security so 2025

@_arohan_ at least I'm confident the current models cannot come up with some of my ideas because they're too far out of distribution, meanwhile shampoo is well within distribution given how long it has been around to be a part of training data

@_arohan_ about the original question, I'm going to guess the answer is yes based off of my intuition of what the current models are good at and capable of, though it wouldn't be easy to extract and verify its claims and is subject to a good prompt and harness

@_arohan_ that internal debate of wanting job security vs being proven right
real test is whether u hope it finds it or not

@_arohan_ every tool you rely on also kinda relies on u still being the one asking the right questions

@_arohan_ he knows the answer and is scared of it
Vitaliy Chiley calls engineering job security a key 2025 theme.
I can't ask Fable this question at all. damn.