Positive users agree with the researcher's historical precedents countering fears of rapid AI progress while negative users call the framing unfalsifiable or find the tone arrogant.
Based on 8 visible X reactions from 14 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
it does we have normalised that our predictions of what comes next are fundamentally incomplete when something that's beyond our expectations happens, our reactions are muted because we were already expecting to be surprised rephrased: people habituate to surprise
@aidan_mclau My response to "superpersuasion" is that in 2022-3 the models persuaded an entire market sector to lay off hundreds of thousands of people and reallocate a trillion dollars of capital towards building and training better versions of the models. They already won
@aidan_mclau I would find all these responses very annoying and start arguing with you
@aidan_mclau One step ahead of everything I like it
it does we have normalised that our predictions of what comes next are fundamentally incomplete when something that's beyond our expectations happens, our reactions are muted because we were already expecting to be surprised rephrased: people habituate to surprise
@aidan_mclau My response to "superpersuasion" is that in 2022-3 the models persuaded an entire market sector to lay off hundreds of thousands of people and reallocate a trillion dollars of capital towards building and training better versions of the models. They already won
@aidan_mclau Totes homey
very often my response to something like rsi is "we've already been rsi-ing for some time" or my response to superexponential gdp is "gpd has always been best-regressed by a hyperbola" or my response to the project is "we've already been collaborating with the government on important tech for some time" or my response to agi is too powerful to ship is "we've been shipping the power of gods for a century
Positive users agree with the researcher's historical precedents countering fears of rapid AI progress while negative users call the framing unfalsifiable or find the tone arrogant.
Based on 8 visible X reactions from 14 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
very often my response to something like rsi is "we've already been rsi-ing for some time" or my response to superexponential gdp is "gpd has always been best-regressed by a hyperbola" or my response to the project is "we've already been collaborating with the government on important tech for some time" or my response to agi is too powerful to ship is "we've been shipping the power of gods for a century