Users are condemning OpenAI for blocking a critic who accused it of hiring experts to push self-serving open source regulation, calling the response weak and evasive of debate.
Based on 4 visible X reactions from 8 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
@buccocapital Dude is weak. And that’s actually somewhat encouraging. They have zero sack and get emotional over twitter spats. They’re gonna need to be much more hardened to pull this off
@dickc @buccocapital You should see his Marc Andreessen-esque introspection after the backlash, you thought the OG post was bad! https://twitter.com/deanwball/status/2078477218406142429
@buccocapital And nothing of value was lost
One thing smart people with self-interested motives like to do is to ladder logically-sound individual premises and then use them to jump to a self-interested conclusion they are working backward from What they do not want you to do is to *start* with the conclusion and say “this is in your self-interest and I am therefore deeply skeptical that you have left a lot out of your argument. Just like you started with your conclusion I am ALSO going to start with your conclusion and build my own set of premises.” They don’t like this because the whole thing crumbles, just as it does here
@buccocapital i had precisely the same thought about his tweet with the exception that i was surprised he actually wrote it in public. it is so comically ridiculous and self-serving at literally EVERYBODY ELSE’S expense. it reads more like an internal memo that should never have been leaked.
Huh. That was fast
Users are condemning OpenAI for blocking a critic who accused it of hiring experts to push self-serving open source regulation, calling the response weak and evasive of debate.
Based on 4 visible X reactions from 8 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.