Vibe Coding Blurs Line Between AI Prototypes and Solid Software
Posts on X debate the limits and value of AI-driven vibe coding.
TLDR
Thomas Slabbers questions criticism of vibe coders by pointing to human-written codebases. Suhas predicts the view that vibe coding suits only small projects will not last. Cody says it lets non-coders build ideas freely. Raman Jha claims it requires strong debugging skills. Lior Messika states vibe coding is now simply coding. Gilad Kahani calls vibe coders creators and founders instead. Zach Waugh notes daily AI use differs from vibe coding and says high-quality results remain rare.
Combined views
—
7 Sources, first seen 31d ago
Sources
RO 
Robin@xdNiBoR@Thomasslabbers 😂😂😂 lmao exactly. I'm confident that a team of well managed AI agents (doable by just 1 person), can create code with a higher quality than a team of 10 developers at a faster pace.
VA Viral Architect@viralarchitect@zachwaugh "WE NEED LESS VIBE CODING!!!" Reply: "To be clear, I use AI every single day in everything I do, but that's because I'm an expert and you are not." STFU with this crap.
PR Pranav Raj@CoffeeAurCode@RamanRjha4647 Vibe coding only works until u get a 2 am call After that you have to clean after your AI agents
NJ Nariman Jelveh@NariBuildsStuff@zuess05 this is already false. vibe coding is the new coding
VA Valenciana@ValencianaAbel@zuess05 It already did tbh
DM David Musk@davidmusk_@lior_eth Accurate