Positive users back the researcher's call against centralized AI control and for open public access, endorsing the typewriter analogy as a defense, while negative users reject the related gun analogy as flawed.
Based on 4 visible X reactions from 3 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
Like any other technology, terrorists will use it to their advantage. Therefore, it is important that everyone has the ability to use this technology and modify it anyway they want, so that they can become resilient to various nefarious actors. It is ridiculously easy to designate anyone you don鈥檛 like as a terrorist. My confidence in whatever regulatory body to not do this is approximately zero. Personally, I think the law should force every model that is served to the public, including frontier models, to be open-sourced. I don鈥檛 believe this will happen, so I hope that economic pressure will make it happen.
@BlackHC More like the only thing that counters a bad guy with a typewriter is that all of us have typewriters.
@togelius So the only good thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a random civilian with a gun?
@BlackHC Dario would be wrong. Public availability of capabilities is necessary to make society AI-resilient. It鈥檚 also morally revolting to have one or a few organizations (such as the current US regime) control frontier AI and decide who gets to use it for what.
Positive users back the researcher's call against centralized AI control and for open public access, endorsing the typewriter analogy as a defense, while negative users reject the related gun analogy as flawed.
Based on 4 visible X reactions from 3 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.