Judging writing after learning AI was involved
Techstrongai shares an argument that learning AI helped write a piece does not change its words: if it seemed good before, readers should be able to explain what makes it worse now.
TLDR
Techstrongai shares an argument that “AI was involved” describes how writing was made, not whether it is good. The post says the piece’s author used AI on his forthcoming book, thanks the tools in its acknowledgments and puts his name on the cover because he is responsible for its contents.
Combined views
14
1 Source, first seen 8h ago