/Tech3h ago

Muse Spark 1.1 beats Gemini 3.6 on 3D game generation

Muse Spark generated working physics at one-third of Gemini's cost.

25165121827.7K

Original post unavailable.

Sentiment

Many users praised Meta's Muse Spark 1.1 for generating better 3D games than Gemini 3.6 at one-third the cost and called the results fun, while some dismissed the demos as junk or embarrassing.

Pos

79.1%

Neg

20.9%

15 comments with sentiment.

Cluster Engagement

Digg Deeper

No Digg Deeper questions have been answered for this story yet.

Posts from X

Most Activity

VIEWS26.1KBOOKMARKS14LIKES162RETWEETS9REPLIES22

AW Alexandr Wang@alexandr_wang

2h ago · 26.1K Views

67TECH

this is pretty cool

atomic.chat@atomic_chat_hq

Meta's Muse Spark 1.1 beat Gemini 3.6 at making 3D arcade games for 3x cheaper! We gave two models the same task: build three 3D tabletop games that play themselves Prompts: - An 8-ball pool break scattering the rack - An air hockey rally that ends in a goal - A foosball table where the rods play the ball Outputs: Muse Spark 1.1: 31.3K tokens, $0.026 Gemini 3.6: 28.8K tokens, $0.073 Muse Spark played all three tables clean with far more detail than Gemini, which barely rendered its backgrounds. Its air hockey glitched and its foosball lagged into a buggy still picture. Muse Spark 1.1 ran the full set perfectly for 3x less

RP Rohan Paul@rohanpaul_ai

3h ago · 3.9K Views

1252TECH

Another interesting experiment by @atomic_chat_hq (a desktop app that runs LLMs locally). Muse Spark 1.1 rendered 3D arcade games that play themselves for $0.026, significantly lower than Gemini 3.6 Flash. Both models got one brief, 3 tabletop games that run themselves with no player input. The code had to drive every shot, since nobody touches the controls. Muse Spark 1.1 spent 31.3K tokens and finished the full set for $0.026. Gemini 3.6 came in leaner on tokens at 28.8K, yet its run cost $0.073. For this kind of 3D arcade games, the real-time physics, a scattering rack or a bouncing puck, all these are genuinely hard to get right.

atomic.chat@atomic_chat_hq

RP Rohan Paul@rohanpaul_ai

3h ago · 561 Views

Github of Atomic-Chat. "an open source alternative to ChatGPT that runs 100% offline on your computer." https://github.com/AtomicBot-ai/Atomic-Chat Download it here. https://atomic.chat

AS Ash@TechProphet_X

31m ago · 41 Views

@alexandr_wang Model is so bad at coding it can’t be compared to any other model except Gemini

MA Matt@rich_matt

1h ago · 81 Views

@alexandr_wang Imagine competing with 3.6 Flash

EE eegii33yahoo.com@eegii33yahoo

1h ago · 119 Views

@alexandr_wang Awesome! 👏

SH Shashank@ShasankVarma8

1h ago · 73 Views

@alexandr_wang Now try kimi

AS Apertion Seeks@Apertionis

1h ago · 70 Views

@alexandr_wang Screw these stupid game demos. All of them.

L🐧lalo 🐧@lalopenguin

1h ago · 19 Views

@rohanpaul_ai @atomic_chat_hq pool is so difficult to get right ! i haven't tried with fable yet, but that's one i've been trying with nearly every model

ZZ ZEREN ZHANG@ZERENZHANG44560

57m ago · 58 Views

@alexandr_wang 股价连跌，一点也不酷

XG X Girls@thesoragirls

2h ago · 56 Views

@alexandr_wang This is literally the experience of using Muse Spark. Just so much fun!

TG Theodore Golob@GolobTheodore

56m ago · 46 Views

@alexandr_wang Penny arcade

HB Hunter Bown@goodhunt

2h ago · 45 Views

@alexandr_wang neat