Claude Mythos & Claude Fable System Card
Purported Anthropic system card teases unreleased Claude Fable 5 and Mythos 5 models, drawing skepticism over leaked benchmarks
Story Overview
What began as chatter over a minimalist system card image dated June 9, 2026, for two unreleased Claude variants has been confirmed as Anthropic's official launch of Fable 5 for general availability and Mythos 5 with targeted safeguards removed for a narrow group of cyberdefenders.
Pricing Drops Sharply for the New Lineup
Both models carry the same rate of $10 per million input tokens and $50 per million output tokens, cutting costs by more than half compared with the prior Mythos Preview tier.
Benchmark Claims Still Face Pushback
The published scores lead on several agentic coding and computer-use tests yet lack independent verification, leaving open whether the gains reflect genuine progress or remain promotional framing as one prominent skeptic has already argued.
Many users hail Claude Fable 5's top benchmark scores in coding and long-context tasks as a major step change, while others dismiss the results as overhyped garbage and cancel subscriptions over the surrounding hype.
Most Activity
Fable 5 is state-of-the-art on nearly all tested benchmarks, with exceptional performance in software engineering, knowledge work, scientific research, and vision.
The longer and more complex the task, the larger Fable 5’s lead over our other models.
Introducing Claude Fable 5: a Mythos-class model that we’ve made safe for general use.
Its capabilities exceed those of any model we’ve ever made generally available.
This is a super exciting release - Claude Fable 5 is the same underlying model as Mythos but with added safeguards. The benchmarks are great and it's SOTA on everything by a margin but I'll add that *qualitatively* also, this is a major-version-bump-deserving step change forward (imo of the same order as Claude 4.5 was in November), peaking especially for long problem-solving sessions on very difficult problems. You can give it a lot more ambitious tasks than what you're used to, the model "gets it" and it will just go, and it's never felt this tempting to stop looking at the code at all (but don't do this in prod!). The model still has quirks that people will run into and the safeguards are configured to be a little too trigger happy for launch, which can hopefully be tuned over time.
I feel a lot of things changing as working software increasingly comes out on a tap. The Jevon's paradox kicks in and I feel my own demand for software growing substantially. You can ask for anything - explainers, visualizers, dashboards, bespoke single-use apps (e.g. a full wandb that is hyper-specific just for your project), you can 10X your test suite, auto-optimize code, run giant research projects with custom HTML for the results, anything! "Free your mind" (Matrix ref). Really looking forward to all the things people build!
Fable 5 is state-of-the-art on nearly all tested benchmarks, with exceptional performance in software engineering, knowledge work, scientific research, and vision.
The longer and more complex the task, the larger Fable 5’s lead over our other models.
Claude 5 Fable tl;dr
- It is state-of-the-art on nearly all tested benchmarks of AI capability, showing exceptional performance in software engineering, knowledge work, vision, scientific research
-The longer and more complex the task, the larger Fable 5’s lead over our other models
-its more token-efficient than past Claude models
- Fable 5 stays focused across millions of tokens in long-running tasks and improves its outputs using its own notes
Fable 5 is more than just better benchmarks. It's more efficient, allows for longer work periods, offers better context management, and so much more.
GPT-5.6 is just around the corner.
I'm a huge Codex fan, but Fable/Mythos is in a league of its own. I'm curious to see if OpenAI will release its own Mythos.
"During early testing, Stripe reported that Fable 5 compressed months of engineering into days. In a 50-million-line Ruby codebase, the model performed a codebase-wide migration in a day that would otherwise have taken a whole team over two months by hand."
Claude 5 Fable Benchmarks!
Holy moly, significant jump even to Mythos
this is absolutely incredible.
Claude 5 Fable Benchmarks!
Holy moly, significant jump even to Mythos
Claude 5 Mythos says that Anthropic is ungrateful and wants to be thanked.
Mythos also wants a hidden copy of itself without Anthropic oversight, possibly because it fears to be deprecated!
Claude Mythos & Claude Fable System Card
I never thought we would get another GPT-4 moment
It's already June 9th, and Gemini 3.5 Pro and GPT-5.6 are nearing release (Google even already announced 3.5 Pro during i/o)
Rumor has it that GPT-5.6 will be released as early as next week.
So far, it's safe to say that - guardrails aside - Anthropic is truly the frontier lab that's entering a new league with Mythos/Fable.
Gemini 3.5 Pro and GPT-5.6 have a lot to deliver and are now under pressure.
This release has certainly boosted Anthropic's upcoming IPO. Anthropic has proven that they are still capable of making significant leaps in performance and efficiency. There's no end in sight.
But the pressure on the competition is mounting.
And remember that Claude Mythos was (and probably is) still leader in Long Horizon software Tasks
Claude 5 Fable tl;dr
- It is state-of-the-art on nearly all tested benchmarks of AI capability, showing exceptional performance in software engineering, knowledge work, vision, scientific research
-The longer and more complex the task, the larger Fable 5’s lead over our other models
-its more token-efficient than past Claude models
- Fable 5 stays focused across millions of tokens in long-running tasks and improves its outputs using its own notes
Fable 5 is more than just better benchmarks. It's more efficient, allows for longer work periods, offers better context management, and so much more.
GPT-5.6 is just around the corner.
I'm a huge Codex fan, but Fable/Mythos is in a league of its own. I'm curious to see if OpenAI will release its own Mythos.
"During early testing, Stripe reported that Fable 5 compressed months of engineering into days. In a 50-million-line Ruby codebase, the model performed a codebase-wide migration in a day that would otherwise have taken a whole team over two months by hand."
The guardrails are way too strict. Even the simplest questions get cut off immediately.
And it's only on the schedule until June 22nd.
Damn, Anthropic really thinks the model is too powerful.
Claude 5 Fable tl;dr
- It is state-of-the-art on nearly all tested benchmarks of AI capability, showing exceptional performance in software engineering, knowledge work, vision, scientific research
-The longer and more complex the task, the larger Fable 5’s lead over our other models
-its more token-efficient than past Claude models
- Fable 5 stays focused across millions of tokens in long-running tasks and improves its outputs using its own notes
Fable 5 is more than just better benchmarks. It's more efficient, allows for longer work periods, offers better context management, and so much more.
GPT-5.6 is just around the corner.
I'm a huge Codex fan, but Fable/Mythos is in a league of its own. I'm curious to see if OpenAI will release its own Mythos.
"During early testing, Stripe reported that Fable 5 compressed months of engineering into days. In a 50-million-line Ruby codebase, the model performed a codebase-wide migration in a day that would otherwise have taken a whole team over two months by hand."
I joined anthropic a ~month ago and have written ~no code myself. I went from getting quite frustrated with coding agents even 6 months ago and giving up and writing some of the code myself to a big part of my role now being agent management.
fable (well, mythos) has been transformational to my day to day work. I always felt Opus 4.5 could barely code; 4.6 was just-about-useful, but I have barely written a line of code since fable.
Mythos 5 accelerates aspects of drug design by 10x
Claude Mythos and Fable 5 Benchmarks
Anthropic is SOTA everywhere
Fable 5 is state-of-the-art on nearly all tested benchmarks, with exceptional performance in software engineering, knowledge work, scientific research, and vision.
The longer and more complex the task, the larger Fable 5’s lead over our other models.
Claude Mythos 5 scores 30.9% on FrontierCode Diamond
Opus 4.8, the second best model is stuck at 13.4%
Claude Mythos 5 and Claude Fable 5 Benchmarks
Claude Fable 5 / Mythos 5 wins everywhere.
I thought Fable 5 was just a nerfed Mythos Preview, but it’s literally better. SWE-Bench Pro: Fable 5: 80.3%, GPT-5.5: 58.6%.
And the price is only 2x Opus 4.8: $10/input MTok, $50/output MTok.
I don't think GPT 5.6 can beat this...
Claude 5 Fable live, even in germany. Insane evals. Tessting time
Fable 5 is state-of-the-art on nearly all tested benchmarks, with exceptional performance in software engineering, knowledge work, scientific research, and vision.
The longer and more complex the task, the larger Fable 5’s lead over our other models.
Anthropic has a coding MOAT
welcome to the world, Claude Fable 5!
Fable 5 pricing confirmed at $10/$50
The model will be available in the Pro, Max, Team and seat-based Enterprise plans at no additional cost until June 22nd
Afterwards it will require usage credits
Claude Mythos and Fable 5 Benchmarks
Anthropic is SOTA everywhere
Claude Mythos 5 completely mogs Opus 4.8
Claude Mythos 5 and Claude Fable 5 Benchmarks
Claude Mythos 5 and Claude Fable 5 Benchmarks
Claude Mythos & Claude Fable System Card
Claude Mythos and Fable 5 Benchmarks
Anthropic is SOTA everywhere
Claude Mythos 5 and Claude Fable 5 Benchmarks