/Tech5h ago

Anthropic faces scrutiny over whether flagged consumer and Claude Code conversations retained for two years are used for training

API and enterprise tiers operate under separate privacy terms.

27378136266.4K
Original post
Dylan Field@zoink#548inTech

um.

If Claude fable flags a conversation (very easy to happen) they can store that seshion for 2 years and they conveniently forgot to mention if they train on that. https://privacy.claude.com/en/articles/10023548-how-long-do-you-store-my-data

9:19 PM · Jun 10, 2026 · 26.4K Views
Sentiment

Users reacted negatively to Claude storing flagged conversations for two years with unclear training use, calling the practice a red flag and accusing Anthropic of concealing its policies.

Pos
0.0%
Neg
100.0%
3 comments with sentiment.
Cluster Engagement
Posts from X
Most Activity
Most Activity
VIEWS3.5KBOOKMARKS4LIKES41RETWEETS2REPLIES2
Beff (e/acc)@beffjezos

Concerning.

If Claude fable flags a conversation (very easy to happen) they can store that seshion for 2 years and they conveniently forgot to mention if they train on that. https://privacy.claude.com/en/articles/10023548-how-long-do-you-store-my-data

3hViews 3.5KLikes 41Bookmarks 4
logan@loosenedspirit

@nisten If they flag it, it’s 7 years.

13hViews 319Likes 7Bookmarks 1

@zoink Figma model when?

5hViews 229Likes 3Bookmarks 1

@nisten I think that Fable refusing to respond, and your prompt being flagged are different things. Asking for advice on training an LLM or a biology question does not go against their terms of use, even if Fable falls back to opus.

6hViews 658Bookmarks 1
BV Hughes@bvhughes

@nisten It’s in the policy. How’s that forgetting to mention it

7hViews 660Likes 2
Mortoshi@HDergler

@nisten plus that "data" is not the specific chat content, but the memory it gets fed from your other chats

5hViews 145Likes 1
HuyVrotec@HVrotec46045

@nisten Good they should store my shit 100% refusals forever

6hViews 289