Midjourney launches a medical hardware division and unveils an AI-powered, radiation-free full-body ultrasonic scanner prototype for in-home care

Most (all?) diseases are downstream from a fundamental cause, none of which allopathic medicine addresses.

While this new scanner seems like a wondrous breakthrough, I wonder if it is just a sales funnel into the assembly line financial/physical/psychological slaughterhouse.

Modern medicine thinks food is mostly irrelevant (except for telling you to avoid what we evolved on).

Modern medicine doctors don't have a clue about cellular energy, let alone deuterium poisoning.

Scanners ain't gonna fix that.

Scanners ===> scalpels and scrips.

The data from midjourney scanning 1 billion people will be more important than the scanner itself or the initial diagnostic potential

The scanner could be less effective than other modern medical imaging, doesn't really matter, think about this like a data scientist & business not a doctor.

Putting it in a spa you can walk into in 60 seconds fundamentally changes how many body scans you can harvest by 10-1000x. The diagnostic and research potential of that data is astounding.

What does a person's medical history & treatment plan look like if they have full body scans every week?

They are building a spa that sells you your body's data.

@krishnanrohit I think "ignorance is bad" and "there is an optimal level of screening, relative to individual history, that balances type I and type II errors to maximize long-term outcomes" are different claims.

Midjourney launched a revolutionary full-body AI medical scanner that aims to make preventive healthcare accessible transforming health monitoring to routine home health improving early disease detection, enhancing long-term health outcomes.

https://readmultiplex.com/2026/06/18/the-scan-that-could-save-your-life-how-midjourney-just-rewrote-the-future-of-medicine/

@PatrickHeizer Just process the extra information better. Or ignore it. We're very far from the optimum.

Congratulations you have chosen the stupidest possible example to demonstrate what is information.

@krishnanrohit Rohit, if the USS can get a diagnosis from imaging alone then I don’t think any doctor would doubt its utility. The problem is that it will show a random nodule/cyst somewhere, which then locks them in to anxiety and ++ monitoring scans ($$) or risky invasive biopsy (can harm)

@Intellionaire I get the problem, but we don't need perfection to use (or discard) extra information

@krishnanrohit i think i buy that more information is bad in an environment that doesnt have a culture of doing anything better with more information

the issue here is institutional capacity and existing culture of medicine

Very good post on how things might change with largescale scanning done regularly. It's a possibility, and data will tell.

@krishnanrohit That optimal point certainly changes w/ advancements across several variables, but to be hyperbolic about it, even at max techno-optimist capability, we aren't going to get anatomical scans every hour. That's negative utility merely from the time aspect. More not *always* better

@krishnanrohit If you run a cut or inject operation then yeah, these scanners are great for drumming up business. Fantastic news for quacks of all types! Cha-ching!

@krishnanrohit Straw man

We need to know its benefits and limitations, evidenced with receipts. We need to know how this will be governed because it can and will break the medical industry if released without care for consequence (as tech bros are known for doing)

All we have ATM is marketing

@RyanMorey They're welcome not to. This is a considered belief and it will take more than a "type 1 and 2 errors exist" comment for me to change my mind.

Not all opinions are malleable, nor should they be.

Even assuming all the problems with patients suddenly asking for procedures and biopsies that could harm them, I simply do not understand why you don't want to get more information so *you* can guide the patients better. Do you not think you'll ever learn more? Or only w/o data?

@krishnanrohit Why would anyone discuss the issue with you if you assert that you refuse to change your opinion no matter what?

@krishnanrohit Remove yourself from the equation, imagine you're now someone who is not good at critical thinking and even worse at ignoring red herrings and rationalizing complex findings

If it is really that difficult to make judgments based on more information, why don't you start doing less tests? Or throw out certain results randomly to see if it improves accuracy? Or is the contention that we are at the perfect point where no additional information is needed.

@MolloyLaurence Screw that, if the midjourney machine doesn't work that's fine. But it will not be because I can't be trusted with more information for my own good.