• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
Technology

Runaway AI risk, automated cybersecurity and the workplace context gap

In a conversation shared by a16z, Databricks' Ali Ghodsi downplays current existential AI risk but warns that human security teams can't keep up. For most companies, he sees missing workplace context—not model intelligence—as the adoption gap.

a16zA1
The InformationTI
5 Sources, 23d ago, first seen 23d ago

TLDR

Databricks' Ali Ghodsi told a16z he doesn't see existential AI risk right now. He points to growing demands for power, GPUs and engineers, plus costly failed training runs, as barriers to a self-improving AI loop. Cybersecurity is his more immediate concern: he says humans can't keep pace and detection is shifting to automated agents. Without that transition, he warns of outages, economic damage and people getting hurt. On adoption, a16z says Ghodsi believes most companies already have smart enough models. What's missing is the company-specific context employees absorb over years.

Combined views

265.6K

5 Sources, first seen 23d ago

675 likes99 comments194 saves100 reposts

Combined views

265.6K

5 Sources, first seen 23d ago

675 likes99 comments194 saves100 reposts

Sentiment

Positive34.7%65.3%Negative

Summary

Many accounts criticized downplaying of AI existential risk and proposals letting OpenAI and Anthropic set safety standards for others as regulatory capture or self-policing, while some welcomed the level-headed nuance on oversight.

Based on 73 sentiment-bearing replies from 55 accounts across 5 conversations.

Sentiment

Positive34.7%65.3%Negative

Summary

Many accounts criticized downplaying of AI existential risk and proposals letting OpenAI and Anthropic set safety standards for others as regulatory capture or self-policing, while some welcomed the level-headed nuance on oversight.

Based on 73 sentiment-bearing replies from 55 accounts across 5 conversations.

5 Sources

a16z@a16zDatabricks' @alighodsi and a16z's Martin Casado on where the AI risk is, and what's unfolding in the cyber space: Martin: "When the internet came out, by this point... we'd disabled hospitals, we'd taken out critical infrastructure, we'd caused tens of billions of dollars in economic damages from worms. All of that had already happened." "AI has so many people that want to find risks and threats. We're running so fast, so much money has been poured into it, and we haven't seen anything commensurate with the early days of worms. What is that disconnect?" Ali: "I am sleeping well at night, and I don't think there's existential risk right now. I do think there's a lot of infrastructure that needs to be secured." "You used to have these SOC teams, security operations center people, that would look at what intrusions are happening, how are we being attacked. And now the humans just can't keep up." "The whole cybersecurity space is transitioning into being fully automated, using agents for detection." "If we don't do that, I do think you will start seeing those kind of things, like sites going down, whole systems that stop working for a while. And there will be consequences, not existential, but economic damage and people getting hurt." @martin_casado23d
The Information@theinformationShould OpenAI and Anthropic get to set the safety standards for other AI companies? "Having OpenAI and Anthropic pace the frontier themselves and decide what others do, I think is a little much, but I absolutely believe they should do that to themselves." “Yes, they’re the absolute frontier.” — @arcee_ai CEO @MarkMcQuade Full TITV episode: https://thein.fo/46xN4t221d
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI

    5 Sources

    a16z@a16zDatabricks' @alighodsi and a16z's Martin Casado on where the AI risk is, and what's unfolding in the cyber space: Martin: "When the internet came out, by this point... we'd disabled hospitals, we'd taken out critical infrastructure, we'd caused tens of billions of dollars in economic damages from worms. All of that had already happened." "AI has so many people that want to find risks and threats. We're running so fast, so much money has been poured into it, and we haven't seen anything commensurate with the early days of worms. What is that disconnect?" Ali: "I am sleeping well at night, and I don't think there's existential risk right now. I do think there's a lot of infrastructure that needs to be secured." "You used to have these SOC teams, security operations center people, that would look at what intrusions are happening, how are we being attacked. And now the humans just can't keep up." "The whole cybersecurity space is transitioning into being fully automated, using agents for detection." "If we don't do that, I do think you will start seeing those kind of things, like sites going down, whole systems that stop working for a while. And there will be consequences, not existential, but economic damage and people getting hurt." @martin_casado23d
    The Information@theinformationShould OpenAI and Anthropic get to set the safety standards for other AI companies? "Having OpenAI and Anthropic pace the frontier themselves and decide what others do, I think is a little much, but I absolutely believe they should do that to themselves." “Yes, they’re the absolute frontier.” — @arcee_ai CEO @MarkMcQuade Full TITV episode: https://thein.fo/46xN4t221d
    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet