Positive users praise GitHub stacked PRs for making code reviews more modular and easier to manage, while negative users criticize the platform's homepage, mobile experience, and other UX issues.
Based on 24 visible X reactions from 35 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
Useless homepage, this is not even funny GIT diff that doesn’t support per char diffs No stacked PRs (I guess at some point?..) Bad mobile experience (reviews, code browsing) Outdated wiki experience The fact that it is easier for me to ask about code through Claude app and not though GitHub app is insane
@moraes_c_ @tekbog @charliermarsh First and foremost: why is the homepage useless? It's modeled like a social feed instead of a dashboard with action items from the repos I've interacted with last. Next: The main use I get from GH is comparing PR diffs and It's so underwhelming, it hasn't improved in years.
@charliermarsh Stacked PRs are a game changer for keeping code reviews modular. It’s one of those things you didn't know you needed until you used it, and then there's no going back. Glad to see GitHub making it first-class.
@charliermarsh My team got access today and so far I’m loving it, really simplifies things!
@charliermarsh I've been waiting for this for YEARS
I've used GitHub's Stacked PRs exactly once and my current opinion is that it's amazing
Positive users praise GitHub stacked PRs for making code reviews more modular and easier to manage, while negative users criticize the platform's homepage, mobile experience, and other UX issues.
Based on 24 visible X reactions from 35 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.