Let's be honest. None of us knew what this did before LLMs.
set -euo pipefail
Let's be honest. None of us knew what this did before LLMs.
set -euo pipefail
Users in the replies dismiss @code_star as naive and inexperienced when discussing LLMs explaining Bash 'Set -euo Pipefail' safety flags.
No Digg Deeper questions have been answered for this story yet.
You think I’m joking?
Let's be honest. None of us knew what this did before LLMs.
set -euo pipefail
It’s crazy because it seems like it’s significantly more emergent as a result of LLMs than even the most famous LLM word.
You think I’m joking?
What’s funny about this, is it’s not evidence no one knew the command before this.
It’s just a marker of when that exact set of flags, in that order, made it into someone’s post-training dataset.
You think I’m joking?

@code_star I still don't. Just like 2>&1, that's none of my business

@code_star imma be honest. I still dont

@code_star You lead a sheltered life

@code_star 🤓

@code_star i did... foolishly used bash as a real scripting language

@code_star and then people wonder why America doesn't have a Qwen or Kimi

@code_star Wait, really?

@batcz Who are you?

@code_star We supposed to know know boss?

@code_star it was perfect for my pr hazing ritual

@code_star bane.jpg

@roeeshenberg I wish

@rishdotuk

@roeeshenberg Just a normal one really.

@code_star someone who no longer wonders why America doesn't have a Qwen or Kimi.

@osoleve @code_star Thats just routing the error into the first argument (most of the times so that whatever error u get , u get on stdout or whatever fail u are printing the output on to)