It would be good to have some serious economists and economic thinkers working on AI who don't seem to be perpetually operating within Twitter-driven AI discourse constraints and talking points, never quite able to think outside that rhetorical and conceptual frame.
Users dismissed economists shaping AI discourse beyond Twitter as they lack technical know-how and substitute superficial opinions for real expertise.
No Digg Deeper questions have been answered for this story yet.
They generally lack the technical know-how, so somehow substitute the peanut gallery for the actual arena and dashboard of what matters even medium term. Also see this phenomenon with policy folk.
It would be good to have some serious economists and economic thinkers working on AI who don't seem to be perpetually operating within Twitter-driven AI discourse constraints and talking points, never quite able to think outside that rhetorical and conceptual frame.
They generally lack the technical know-how, so somehow substitute the peanut gallery for the actual arena and dashboard of what matters even medium term. Also see these with policy folk.
It would be good to have some serious economists and economic thinkers working on AI who don't seem to be perpetually operating within Twitter-driven AI discourse constraints and talking points, never quite able to think outside that rhetorical and conceptual frame.