Takeoff AI founder Mckay Wrigley argues AI model reviews must include concrete usage examples instead of vague testimonials
Critics warn current reviews read like unhelpful marketing copy.
Critics warn current reviews read like unhelpful marketing copy.
@iruletheworldmo my daily token usage is up 5x since fable re-release compared to my rolling 30 day avg. i can’t get enough.
@mckaywrigley Agreed — benchmarks without concrete outputs are just vibes in a lab coat.
@mckaywrigley Mandatory thread sharing should become the norm 😁
it’s my new daily driver” “it’s more like a coworker” “it’s a real workhorse” model reviews should be *required* to come with examples now. they read like absolute slop.
@mckaywrigley tbf i don’t think concrete examples are allowed. would love a wrigley take on both models and where we’re heading soon though sir.
Users back requiring real usage examples in AI model reviews because vague benchmarks seem meaningless while some dislike unsubstantiated claims.
Based on 7 visible X reactions from 8 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.