Positive users see more benefits than costs in open weight models and view the warning as promoting American supremacy, while negative users fear security risks, innovation loss, and higher costs for American companies.
Based on 7 visible X reactions from 14 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
This would force American companies -- and only American companies -- to overpay for access, to overpriced LLMs, purchased from a company your firm invested in (at least in your steel analogy). Everyone else pays for the policy proposals that benefit your cos. And it doesn't have anything to do with supposed IP theft.
@shaunmmaguire @parkerconrad When you flood the world with open weights, the competitive edge is price per watt US has a disadvantage in higher price per token because their politics made it so hard to build data centers and power plants You have to fix your nimbys before engineering
@shaunmmaguire @zanehengsperger @parkerconrad I believe the answer is unambiguously yes. We allowed China to turn the innovation engine of the world into a “rust belt”! They gutted our manufacturing and will come after our AI inventions if we let them.
@shaunmmaguire @parkerconrad Chinese open weights can be poison pilled, which is a security risk. Meaning, they could be sensitive to specific prompts or prompt patterns and take some action based on those patterns. A Chinese backdoor of sorts.
@NickFlows @parkerconrad Agree I think having leading edge open weight models has more benefits than costs at this point But I think it's important to be clear eyed about all of these trade offs
@parkerconrad @shaunmmaguire I think it’s fair to say Shaun is advocating for American open source supremacy, not a banning of open source.
Steel has no nationality. Chinese Steel in American buildings on American soil is as American as apple pie... But what about when that was a deliberate dumping strategy to destroy the American steel industry? --- America NEEDS leading edge open weight models, but it's reasonable to ask: is China playing a game we don't fully understand designed to weaken our AI industry over the next decade? The equivalent of US Steel being forced to sell to Nippon Steel All of that said, I have a strong bias to *not* ban Chinese open weight models (at least not now) but I don't think it's as cut and dried as it appears on the surface
Positive users see more benefits than costs in open weight models and view the warning as promoting American supremacy, while negative users fear security risks, innovation loss, and higher costs for American companies.
Based on 7 visible X reactions from 14 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
When China was dumping steel on the world, the correct move was to put high tariffs on it or ban it Yes that would have meant short term the countries that allowed it in would have a lower cost for steel But a decade later they’d lose their steel production I want open source! Just for us to be thoughtful.