If anthropic can't convince a bunch of tech bro's on X that they're not safety washing, good luck convincing the american public.
11:03 AM · Jun 9, 2026 · 13.1K Views
AI2's Nathan Lambert says Anthropic's failure to convince technical users of its safety sincerity damages its public credibility
Founder Bojan Tunguz also questioned Anthropic's safety protocol legitimacy.
29390181517.1K
Sentiment
Sentiment building, check back later.
Cluster Engagement
Posts from X
Most Activity
Most Activity
VIEWS3.4KBOOKMARKS4LIKES83REPLIES13
Bojan Tunguz@tunguz
Starting to suspect that Anthropic's putative security and safety considerations are largely posturing and performative.
1hViews 3.4KLikes 83Bookmarks 4
RETWEETS2
Luca Soldaini 🎀@soldni
I think self-consistency is such a rare virtue nowadays that people can't conceive of an org that sticks to its mission
agree with them or not, all steps from Ant's leadership are very predictable after conditioning on their core values
Nathan Lambert@natolambert
If anthropic can't convince a bunch of tech bro's on X that they're not safety washing, good luck convincing the american public.
1hViews 2.5KLikes 28Bookmarks 2
(((ل()(ل() 'yoav))))👾@yoavgo
the anthropic silent limits thing is not "dishonest", not "a terrible idea", not "evil", not "dangerous" etc etc. it is just very disingenuous (but also very on brand) for them to claim they do it for "safety concerns". that is all.
34mViews 667Likes 18Bookmarks 3
Luca Soldaini 🎀@soldni
the silently failing strategy is a bit weird. I can speculate it is to prevent jailbreak, but not doing same for other safety risks is one rare case of non-consistent strategy.
Luca Soldaini 🎀@soldni
I think self-consistency is such a rare virtue nowadays that people can't conceive of an org that sticks to its mission
agree with them or not, all steps from Ant's leadership are very predictable after conditioning on their core values
1hViews 358Likes 10Bookmarks 0