I think an AI pause is a bad idea. Isn't mythos their most aligned model ever? This feels like it will be self correcting, if RSI hits itll have better ideas for handling RSI than we do
Researcher Chris Paxton argues aligned systems can self-correct risks
I think an AI pause is a bad idea. Isn't mythos their most aligned model ever? This feels like it will be self correcting, if RSI hits itll have better ideas for handling RSI than we do
Users question Anthropic's call for AI labs to slow development over self-improvement risks, arguing that aligned models should advance rather than pause.

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jun/05/anthropic-urges-temporary-pause-on-ai-development-to-discuss-risks

@chris_j_paxton this is the most logical take ive seen on this whole debate
if the model is that aligned, why pause before it can show us

The significance of these discussions is that AI safety is no longer confined to research labs and academic papers. As capabilities advance and economic stakes grow, questions about deployment thresholds, governance, and acceptable risk are increasingly becoming matters for executives, regulators, investors, and national governments rather than technical specialists alone.

@SpirosMargaris That shift from theory to governance is the real inflection point
Researcher Chris Paxton argues aligned systems can self-correct risks
I think an AI pause is a bad idea. Isn't mythos their most aligned model ever? This feels like it will be self correcting, if RSI hits itll have better ideas for handling RSI than we do