/Tech13h ago

White House AI advisor Sriram Krishnan warns that open science and singularity-focused AI acceleration are becoming incompatible

Story Overview

Sriram Krishnan, the White House AI advisor appointed by President Trump, posted on X that colleagues increasingly see open research norms clashing with beliefs in an accelerating path to AI singularity, and he argues the West must keep research, compute, and ideas openly distributed unless extraordinary evidence proves otherwise.

1461.8K114169268K
Original post
Sriram Krishnan@sriramk#336inTech

just to state the obvious: think there's a collison course between those who believe research and science should be open and those who believe we are in an accelerating singularity curve.

I have many smart friends who have believed both for a while but seeing more and more their realization that these beliefs will be in conflict.

I for one believe that America and the west needs open and distributed access to research and computation and sharing of ideas at all times.

2:40 AM · Jun 10, 2026 · 211K Views
Policy Risk

Distributed Access Remains the Default Stance

Krishnan frames open science as the historical Western baseline and rejects the idea that 'this time it is different' as justification for restricting access, leaving the burden on anyone proposing limits.

Open Question

No External Confirmation Yet on the Tension

The warning appears only in Krishnan's June 10 posts and replies, with no linked policy documents, administration statements, or corroborating coverage available at the time of the snapshot.

Sentiment

Positive users back calls for open access to AI research because it accelerates civilization and benefits humanity, while negative users accuse advocates of VC hypocrisy or question who will fund it.

Pos
75.5%
Neg
24.5%
47 comments with sentiment.
Cluster Engagement
Posts from X
Most Activity
Most Activity
VIEWS29.2KBOOKMARKS15RETWEETS14REPLIES24
Garry Tan@garrytan

Open access to innovation must be protected

just to state the obvious: think there's a collison course between those who believe research and science should be open and those who believe we are in an accelerating singularity curve.

I have many smart friends who have believed both for a while but seeing more and more their realization that these beliefs will be in conflict.

I for one believe that America and the west needs open and distributed access to research and computation and sharing of ideas at all times.

12hViews 29.2KLikes 210Bookmarks 15
LIKES220
Yann LeCun@ylecun

@sriramk We've been colliding head-on repeatedly for several years now.

just to state the obvious: think there's a collison course between those who believe research and science should be open and those who believe we are in an accelerating singularity curve.

I have many smart friends who have believed both for a while but seeing more and more their realization that these beliefs will be in conflict.

I for one believe that America and the west needs open and distributed access to research and computation and sharing of ideas at all times.

11hViews 17.8KLikes 220Bookmarks 6

@ylecun Yes. And open research and science needs to prevail.

Yann LeCun@ylecun

@sriramk We've been colliding head-on repeatedly for several years now.

9hViews 4.2KLikes 65Bookmarks 0

@garrytan democratization of access to tech and research has been the heart of Silicon Valley forever.

Garry Tan@garrytan

Open access to innovation must be protected

11hViews 3.8KLikes 32Bookmarks 2
Sreeram Kannan@sreeramkannan

@sriramk We did this experiment to get the open community armed with AI agents to invent a Quantum Circuit which is 13x better than the published SOTA and beat Google's unpublished circuit.

6hViews 2.3KLikes 31

@tunguz @franciscojarceo I grew up on open source, it and open access to computing and research is why my entire career exists.

@sriramk @franciscojarceo Thank you for saying that.

11hViews 2.4KLikes 54Bookmarks 0

I don’t think that these are necessarily on a collision course. Here is my synthesis:

An intelligence recursion is far too powerful and risky to happen behind closed doors. If done at all it should be done out in the open, accountable to outside scientists & the public at large.

just to state the obvious: think there's a collison course between those who believe research and science should be open and those who believe we are in an accelerating singularity curve.

I have many smart friends who have believed both for a while but seeing more and more their realization that these beliefs will be in conflict.

I for one believe that America and the west needs open and distributed access to research and computation and sharing of ideas at all times.

7hViews 1KLikes 19Bookmarks 1

@sriramk @franciscojarceo Thank you for saying that.

just to state the obvious: think there's a collison course between those who believe research and science should be open and those who believe we are in an accelerating singularity curve.

I have many smart friends who have believed both for a while but seeing more and more their realization that these beliefs will be in conflict.

I for one believe that America and the west needs open and distributed access to research and computation and sharing of ideas at all times.

11hViews 2.8KLikes 22Bookmarks 0
Sreeram Kannan@sreeramkannan

@sriramk There seems to be a world where (1) AI and agents can maximize individual agency and (2) another world where it constrains it.

Deeply appreciate your leadership and stewardship towards the former. We need a lot more work to get there!

5hViews 144Likes 6Bookmarks 1
Vincent Weisser@vincentweisser

@sriramk 100% agree! thanks for your work pushing for this Srinam!! 🙏

just to state the obvious: think there's a collison course between those who believe research and science should be open and those who believe we are in an accelerating singularity curve.

I have many smart friends who have believed both for a while but seeing more and more their realization that these beliefs will be in conflict.

I for one believe that America and the west needs open and distributed access to research and computation and sharing of ideas at all times.

10hViews 488Likes 15Bookmarks 0

@sriramk I think they could both be true!

7hViews 83Likes 2Bookmarks 1

@kzitouni1 I refuse to believe a small set of people however well meaning are safer than broad academic scrutiny.

11hViews 163Likes 5
engineer guy@dragonmhmh8

@sreeramkannan @sriramk My Code Already Cracks 20-19 Bits Keys : https://github.com/threealgos/Quantum-RegeV-Cracker

5hViews 34Likes 2

@theHazarika I think the answer to that is having more science and research to make it serve everyone, not less.

13hViews 365Likes 2
Vincent Weisser@vincentweisser

@sriramk 100% agree! thanks for your work pushing for this Sriram!! 🙏

just to state the obvious: think there's a collison course between those who believe research and science should be open and those who believe we are in an accelerating singularity curve.

I have many smart friends who have believed both for a while but seeing more and more their realization that these beliefs will be in conflict.

I for one believe that America and the west needs open and distributed access to research and computation and sharing of ideas at all times.

6hViews 314Likes 8Bookmarks 0
David Manheim@davidmanheim

@sriramk It sounds like you reject the notion that we are in an accelerating singularity curve? (Or is the argument that even if progress is accelerating, openness is sufficiently safe? Or that open progress justifies some safety tradeoff?)

13hViews 581Likes 2

@davidmanheim the second statement is closest to my world view. I believe in Linus's Law. If we *are* in a singularity, I want as many smart people in the west to be involved in research on this as possible.

12hViews 279Likes 2

@AWar1586398 They are not obviously

9hViews 208Likes 2
Load more posts