Redmon says developers use assumed moral superiority to self-justify.
@pjreddie that the definition of harmlessness, while based on public input and 3rd parties consultation, is ultimately up to them unless compelled by law
@soldni What are their core values? Is harmless not one of them??
Users criticize AI firms for redefining harmlessness themselves as a self-serving claim of moral superiority without legal mandates.
@soldni Yeah, I mean I think they believe they are somehow morally superior and virtuous and anything they do must be correct because they are the “good guys” and in that way they are consistent but sort of vacuously so
@pjreddie that the definition of harmlessness, while based on public input and 3rd parties consultation, is ultimately up to them unless compelled by law
@soldni @pjreddie Yeah super consistent. The US military is also ‘harmless’ if you allow them to redefine what the word means whenever they need to…
Redmon says developers use assumed moral superiority to self-justify.
@pjreddie that the definition of harmlessness, while based on public input and 3rd parties consultation, is ultimately up to them unless compelled by law
@soldni What are their core values? Is harmless not one of them??