📣 #EACL2027 updates: the Call for Papers is live, and our keynote speakers are confirmed! Main conference: 9–14 March 2027. Special theme: The Human in Language. 🧵👇 https://2027.eacl.org/calls/papers/
Users praise EACL 2027's separation of author response and author-reviewer discussion into distinct stages because it allows more focused time for each phase.
No Digg Deeper questions have been answered for this story yet.
Most Activity

🎤 And our keynote speakers, spanning efficient AI, LLM interpretability & the neuroscience of language: 🌟 Sara Hooker (Adaption Labs) 🌟 Mor Geva (Tel Aviv University) 🌟 Uri Hasson (Princeton)

We welcome long (8p) and short (4p) papers across 25+ areas — LLM agents, multilinguality, interpretability, MT, and more. Negative results, surveys, position papers, new resources, and reproductions are all in scope. 🙌
🗓️ Key dates (AoE): ARR submission: 3 Aug 2026 Reviewer registration: 5 Aug 2026 EACL commitment: 11 Oct 2026 Notification: 12 Nov 2026

Submit by 3 Aug 2026 (ARR) and join us in March 2027. 📄 CfP: https://2027.eacl.org/calls/papers/ 🎤 Keynotes: https://2027.eacl.org/program/keynotes/ #NLProc #EACL2027

🗓️ Key dates (AoE): ARR submission: 3 Aug 2026 Reviewer registration: 5 Aug 2026 EACL commitment: 11 Oct 2026 Notification: 12 Nov 2026

Reviewing runs through ACL Rolling Review: submit to ARR → commit to EACL. ⚠️ New this cycle: author response (14–19 Sept) & author–reviewer discussion (20–24 Sept) are now two separate stages.

The theme The Human in Language invites work which focuses on the connection between NLP and the broader scientific understanding of human language. How can these shape model development, evaluation, interpretability & interaction?
🎤 And our keynote speakers, spanning efficient AI, LLM interpretability & the neuroscience of language: 🌟 Sara Hooker (Adaption Labs) 🌟 Mor Geva (Tel Aviv University) 🌟 Uri Hasson (Princeton)

@eaclmeeting "author response (14–19 Sept) & author–reviewer discussion (20–24 Sept) are now two separate stages."
Interesting change. IMO it's good. More time and having 2 stages facilitates having a proper discussion.